
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/28/arts/ ... ref=slogin
and so i wonder if this is the future, ie homemade "deviated" gear, producing tailored sounds....
Seems to me a promising continuation of the DIY movement.
Naw. its just f**k nosie for weans.Stab Frenzy wrote:It's punk rock all over again. Again.
haha... unfortuntately I kind of agree with you-it's basically trainspotting to the nth degree. But each to his own!crow wrote:Naw. its just f**k nosie for weans.Stab Frenzy wrote:It's punk rock all over again. Again.
Punk rock, even through the 80% shite, still had a purpose or even just enthusiasm for actually being able to play.
these f**k things just remind me of old days when it was raining and i couldn't get outside to feel girls tits.
f**k depressio.![]()
Yeah, but they were never lo-fi really...they went from being a Neu rip-off to making some very good music of their own...and those later recordings are very hi-fi IMHO.sequence wrote:Ask Stereolab. They seemed pretty good at mixing Minimoogs w/lo-fiSir Ruff wrote:Is progress using old things in a new way? I guess that's kind of what techno was about...
JSRockit wrote:Yeah, but they were never lo-fi really...they went from being a Neu rip-off to making some very good music of their own...and those later recordings are very hi-fi IMHO.sequence wrote:Ask Stereolab. They seemed pretty good at mixing Minimoogs w/lo-fiSir Ruff wrote:Is progress using old things in a new way? I guess that's kind of what techno was about...
The way people are carrying on, you'd think it was.Sir Ruff wrote:Is progress using old things in a new way?