Worst Roland Synth EVER!

Discussions about anything analog, digital, MIDI, synth technology, techniques, theories and more.
Post Reply
User avatar
BlackGnosis
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
Posts: 524
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 12:18 pm
Real name: Stormy
Gear: See signature image.
Band: Eridani V
Location: San Angelo, TX
Contact:

Worst Roland Synth EVER!

Post by BlackGnosis » Tue May 13, 2008 10:52 am

Whats your vote everyone? I'm curious to see what you all think.


>.> <.<


I have two synths in mind. Either the Roland D-5 due to poor voicing or the TB-303 due to how obnoxiously complicated it was, maybe intuitive at the time, but you needed to spend about 6-7 hours of good experimentation before getting a grasp of how to work it.
Image
Ashe37 wrote:I find it funny that you're a guitar pedal snob and yet don't own a single analog synth.

User avatar
JJQ
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 432
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:03 pm
Location: Malmo, east-side

Post by JJQ » Tue May 13, 2008 11:39 am

Roland, bad synths???

Dont know any. :)
Gear: Minimoog, Mother-32, Roland MC-202, TB-303, (Boss) DR-110, TR-505, TR-808, Alpha Juno 2, Jupiter-8, Oberheim SEM, .com/oakley/moon/mos-lab/STG/Sputnik/MegaOhm-modular & Microbrute

User avatar
Syn303
Expert Member
Expert Member
Posts: 1400
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 3:46 pm
Gear: Quite a bit...
Band: Syn303
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: Worst Roland Synth EVER!

Post by Syn303 » Tue May 13, 2008 12:24 pm

BlackGnosis wrote:Whats your vote everyone? I'm curious to see what you all think.


>.> <.<


I have two synths in mind. Either the Roland D-5 due to poor voicing or the TB-303 due to how obnoxiously complicated it was, maybe intuitive at the time, but you needed to spend about 6-7 hours of good experimentation before getting a grasp of how to work it.
What the 303? No! GTFO :roll: the sequencer is easy to use, once you have mastered it like i have. Besides it's the quirky sequencer that gives the 303 it's special character.

The worst Roland's would have to be the MC-303, MC-09 & EG-101. Roland mainly produce re-packaged c**p these days. And Revive old synth names cause they have ran out of ideas.
| syn303.bandcamp.com | soundcloud.com/syn303 |

User avatar
OriginalJambo
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
Posts: 2556
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:04 am
Gear: Check my sig
Location: Scotland, United Kingdom

Re: Worst Roland Synth EVER!

Post by OriginalJambo » Tue May 13, 2008 12:59 pm

Syn303 wrote:Roland mainly produce re-packaged c**p these days. And Revive old synth names cause they have ran out of ideas.
Agreed, although the V-Synth is a rare exception.

User avatar
Jexus
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 344
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 11:59 am

Post by Jexus » Tue May 13, 2008 1:49 pm

JX-1 ?
I'm not familiar with the sound.
But the looks are horrible.
Anyone played it ?

AstroDan
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 226
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 12:05 am
Location: Rogers, Ar

Post by AstroDan » Tue May 13, 2008 2:23 pm

XP-10. Do I win?
Too futurist to live.

User avatar
Z
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
Posts: 3504
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 3:08 am
Gear: Bubble wrap, Styrofoam, boxes, packing tape
Location: Docking Bay 94 (Dallas, TX)
Contact:

Post by Z » Tue May 13, 2008 2:25 pm

Jexus wrote:JX-1 ?
I'm not familiar with the sound.
But the looks are horrible.
Anyone played it ?
Yeah, these came out in the early 90's when I worked at GC. It was basically a ROMpler in a flashy case trying to revive the "rocker" keyboard market. Has nothing to do with the original JX line. I don't remember selling a single one. The JV-80 & JV-30 were more capable and better sellers back then.

User avatar
Yoozer
Expert Member
Expert Member
Posts: 1390
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 1:31 pm

Post by Yoozer » Tue May 13, 2008 2:36 pm

Jexus wrote: Anyone played it ?
The organ sound in Felix - Don't You Want Me came out of the JX-1. I've played one - the keys were passable (not as bad as those of the Korg Micro-X, go figure), and the sounds cut through the mix pretty well. Plus, it had a nice monophonic lead (with delay effect) and a very nice set of atmo pad sounds (for that time).

Its main advantages were that it could cut and that it didn't weigh anything. The DX7 and JX3P I had to drag with me in the summer weather for a mile to some gig were far worse ;).
"Part of an instrument is what it can do, and part of it is what you do to it" - Suzanne Ciani, 197x.

User avatar
tyrannosaurus mark
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 581
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 11:10 am

Post by tyrannosaurus mark » Tue May 13, 2008 2:56 pm

sh-201

I had a play on one of these in a shop the other week and it sounded just awful
Moog LP + Casio SK1 and MT-75 + tube amp = good tone.

User avatar
Johnny Lenin
Expert Member
Expert Member
Posts: 1054
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 9:56 pm
Gear: JX8P | AX60 | Little Phatty Stage II | DW8000 | Vox Jag | Fantom X6 | Juno-G | P-Bass | AS-120 | Double Jet

Post by Johnny Lenin » Tue May 13, 2008 3:06 pm

The problem with Roland, for synthheads, is that they don't just make synths for synthheads. The XP-10 was what it was -- an easy-to-use, inexpensive ROMpler with some reasonably good, and a few excellent acoustic presets. It's not a programmer's synth, but if you were in a bar band or playing in a church, it gave you all the basic pianos and organs you'd need -- and the pianos were quite good for the time.

The newer stuff, like the Juno-D/G, etc., are nothing like the 6/60/106 except in terms of pricepoint and target market. The fact that a Juno-D is no Juno-106 doesn't alter the fact that it's a reasonably well-made, extremely affordable entry-level ROMpler with some outstanding acoustic patches and some quite workable pads, etc.

Roland is actually a well-run business, focusing [at the $600-$1000 price point, in any event] on lower margins and higher volumes than Moog and DSI. They're not selling to synthheads because they know the guy who is offended by the way they repurposed the Juno name is probably going to buy a used synth, anyway. There's no profit in playing to the synthhead market at the $600-$1000 pricepoint, at least in terms of volume sales.

It's ridiculous to say that the Juno-D is a shitty synth because it's not a Juno-60, or that the XP-10 is a shitty synth because it's not a D-50. They are what they are.

Now the Korg X-50 [my first ROMpler!]... now there's a shitty synth. Crummy acoustic emulations, lousy interface, cheese-a*s keyboard, butt-ugly design, a papier-mache construction. [No wonder I returned it and got the Juno-D instead.]

ramos
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 154
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 5:06 am
Location: Melbourne - Australia

Post by ramos » Tue May 13, 2008 3:19 pm

tb-303? sacrilege!

its not hard to use at all.
Sh-101, tb-303, Juno-6, Jx-3p, TR-808, TR-707, TR-727,Oberheim DMX - Tascam m-312b + ghetto effects

User avatar
V301H
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 750
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 3:58 am
Gear: Fender The Strat, Stratocaster, Jazz Bass Rickenbacker 360-12, 320 Messenger(Mark Farner)
Band: The Characters
Location: New Jersey
Contact:

Post by V301H » Tue May 13, 2008 4:07 pm

I thought the D-70 was pretty bad. It should have better than a D-50, but wasn't even close. Not a particularly good master keyboard despite having 76 keys. Bought one new direct from Roland without trying it first. Fortunately I was able to sell it for what I paid.
Prophet 5 rev.2, Pro-One, Juno 60, Jupiter 6, Matrix 12, OB8, MS20, Poly 800, CS70M, DX-7, CP35, Casio PX-5S, Hammond C3/M102, Vox Continental/Super Continental, Gibson G101, Farfisa Compact, RMI 300A, Pianet N, Combo Pianet, S770, S760, S50, NS3C

User avatar
aXL
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 247
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 8:28 pm
Gear: Moog LP Stage II, Ensoniq ESQ-1, Nord Electro 3, Roland JP-8080, Akai SynthStation 49, numerous softies...
Band: Nemesis Kane
Location: Somewhere

Post by aXL » Tue May 13, 2008 4:13 pm

I'll second the SH-201. That one, even when taking into consideration the Roland marketing strategy and business plan, is a PoS of proportions. Granted, it's very immediate thanks to its passable UI, but it's completely devoid of charm and good tone. It's basically a cheap rehash of the superior JP-80x0 synths, replete with a useless D-Beam implementation (done way better on the V-Synth and GT).
Sir Nose wrote:It's like sex with or without a condom. You know which choice is gonna feel better, but it's not always a wise choice.
Disciples of the new wave, portaits in the sand...

User avatar
Alex E
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
Posts: 2235
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 12:07 am
Gear: Virus C, Super Bass Station, M1r, TX81z, S760, Nord Rack 2, Nord Lead 3, JP-8000, JV-2080, SY99, Trinity Plus, EMX1, TB-03. Live 9, iMac MC309XX/A
Location: Anaheim, CA

Post by Alex E » Tue May 13, 2008 4:21 pm

MT-32, JX1, TB-303 (it has it's place in music history though...) MC-303

The D70 was orignally going to be called the U50 I think. They decided to go with the D name at the very end of development. I'm pretty sure it's just a rompler, so comparing it to the D50 is unfair in that regard. It should have just been the U50..

I tried a TB-303 twice. I wasn't familiar with it and I couldn't figure it out. If I could watch that nice tutorial on yotuube with it in front of me it probably would have been a lot of fun.

My MC-303 had a really stupid way of doing things with MIDI, quantization, recording, etc. What a stupid little box. What were they thinking? How hard would it be to remake the 303 with a cheapy VA engine with a faithful recreation of the 303 sound???
It's like Roland has forgotten everything that made them who they are today.
soundcloud.com/vectron


User avatar
THM
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 200
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 10:27 am
Gear: ARP 2600
Elka Synthex
EML Polybox
EMS SynthiAKS
mTron
MOOG Mini- & Memorymoog
Oberheim SEM
Roland Jupiter-8/...
Yamaha CS80
DotCom
>see MySpace
Band: THM
Location: Belgium - in de Westvloanders
Contact:

Post by THM » Tue May 13, 2008 4:50 pm

I'd say almost any Roland synth that is not analog.
Only 3 exceptions (in order of timeline):
1° the TR-909 that is digital but still is one of the greatest drum machines ever
2° the JD-800/JD-990 that still has some great sounds and features
3° the JP-8000/JP-8080 that is imho still the greatest VA synth
Last edited by THM on Tue May 13, 2008 7:24 pm, edited 2 times in total.
DotCom Modular * ARP 2600 * Elka Synthex * EML PolyBox * EMS Synthi AKS * MOOG Minimoog Model D, Memorymoog * Kurzweil PC88 * Oberheim SEM * Roland Jupiter-8, JP-8080, Juno-60, TR808, TB303, MKS50, RE301, SDE330, SRV330 * Yamaha CS0 * see THM on MySpace

Post Reply