Korg and Roland -- old again
Forum rules
READ: VSE Board-Wide Rules and Guidelines
READ: VSE Board-Wide Rules and Guidelines
- gridsleep
- Supporting Member!
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 8:10 pm
- Real name: Kurt
- Gear: Das Vorlagengehirn
- Band: Big Steam Horse
- Location: the Hudson Valley
- Contact:
Korg and Roland -- old again
Looks like K & R are anxious to stay on top of the VSE, so they decided to do what they do well, best -- by doing what they used to do ... again. Oh, and let's not forget Novation. So, we have the Kronos, which is basically everything Korg have done up until now in one unit that hardly anyone can afford; the Jupiter-80, and the less said about that, the better; and the Ultranova, which somehow seems less than even a Nova. Maybe they should have called it the Mini-Nova, but that sounds like an album by a couple of overzexxed Russian teenage girls. Or the Mikro-Nova, since it's trying to do what someone else's Micro-something is doing. All the independant designers are making sheetmetal 1980's analogs. I officially declare the age of anything new to be over.
Unless someone is working on a fractal calculus sound engine for eighteen dimensions of audio.
Unless someone is working on a fractal calculus sound engine for eighteen dimensions of audio.
Nymph, in thy orisons be all my synths remembered.
- balma
- Synth Explorer
- Posts: 2851
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 3:52 pm
- Real name: Mauricio
- Gear: DSI Tempest/Prophet 08/Roland V-Synth/Ensoniq Fizmo/E-mu MP7-XL7/Electribe ESX1/Radias/Waldorf MicroQ
- Location: Costa Rica
Re: Korg and Roland -- old again
And what happens if VSE´s readers and members, does not like what "K & R" release?
Do they go to bankruptcy?
Do they go to bankruptcy?

His sex dungeons are rumored to hold hundreds of people in secret locations around the world.
https://soundcloud.com/balma
https://soundcloud.com/balma
- cornutt
- Moderator
- Posts: 2117
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:03 am
- Gear: 6th
- Location: Rocket City USA
- Contact:
Re: Korg and Roland -- old again
I'll agree that most of the design innovation seems to be in soft synths these days. My guess is that the hardware companies have seen what happened to the Neuron, plus the relatively anemic sales of the OASYS and V-Synth, and drawn some conclusions from that.
Switches, knobs, buttons, LEDs, LCD screens, monitors, keys, mice, jacks, sockets. Now two joysticks!
- nuketifromorbit
- Expert Member
- Posts: 1346
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:07 am
Re: Korg and Roland -- old again
Modular cough cough...cornutt wrote:I'll agree that most of the design innovation seems to be in soft synths these days.
We'll always be remembered, we'll always be dismembered.
- Doooooooom
- Newbie
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 9:02 pm
- Gear: Microkorg, Mopho Keyboard, Korg SP-300 piano, Roland KC-110 amp, Korg Pandora.
- Location: UK
Re: Korg and Roland -- old again
Dewanatron are doing interesting stuff. I think Yamaha should do an FM synth with full hands-on control like an MS2000.
Re: Korg and Roland -- old again
OASYS: $8Kgridsleep wrote: So, we have the Kronos, which is basically everything Korg have done up until now in one unit that hardly anyone can afford;
Kronos: $3K (and that's around the price of the Motifs and Fantoms).
What were you saying again?
"Part of an instrument is what it can do, and part of it is what you do to it" - Suzanne Ciani, 197x.
- Stab Frenzy
- Moderator
- Posts: 9723
- Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 5:41 pm
- Gear: Eurorack, RYTM, Ultranova, many FX
- Location: monster island*
- Contact:
Re: Korg and Roland -- old again
This is the biggest load of drivel posted on VSE in a long time, and that's saying something. Congratulations!gridsleep wrote:Looks like K & R are anxious to stay on top of the VSE, so they decided to do what they do well, best -- by doing what they used to do ... again. Oh, and let's not forget Novation. So, we have the Kronos, which is basically everything Korg have done up until now in one unit that hardly anyone can afford; the Jupiter-80, and the less said about that, the better; and the Ultranova, which somehow seems less than even a Nova. Maybe they should have called it the Mini-Nova, but that sounds like an album by a couple of overzexxed Russian teenage girls. Or the Mikro-Nova, since it's trying to do what someone else's Micro-something is doing. All the independant designers are making sheetmetal 1980's analogs. I officially declare the age of anything new to be over.
Unless someone is working on a fractal calculus sound engine for eighteen dimensions of audio.
- Pro5
- Expert Member
- Posts: 1002
- Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:30 pm
- Gear: OB-6 | SH-2 | JX-3P | JD-800 | Performer
- Location: U.K
Re: Korg and Roland -- old again
to OP> what have you got against oversexxed Russian teens?
Re: Korg and Roland -- old again
"Ultranova" fits perfectly. It's a Nova pushed to the max. Feature wise, the Ultranova is on top of the Nova range. it includes more oscillators, more filters, wavetables, an extremely deep modulation matrix, LFO waveforms, more effects, variable filter distortion, A programmable gater, a chorder, better converters, a vocoder, usb connection, a dynamic user interface, etc...gridsleep wrote:and the Ultranova, which somehow seems less than even a Nova. Maybe they should have called it the Mini-Nova, but that sounds like an album by a couple of overzexxed Russian teenage girls. Or the Mikro-Nova, since it's trying to do what someone else's Micro-something is doing.
There's nothing mini or micro about the Novation UltraNova, only its price

Personnaly I think Novation did a great job. The Ultranova is really a step forward.
- tallowwaters
- Moderator
- Posts: 4998
- Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 4:11 am
- Gear: LC-MS/MS
- Location: snake's belly in a wagon rut
Re: Korg and Roland -- old again
They don't like to gaze at his navel as much as he does?Pro5 wrote:to OP> what have you got against oversexxed Russian teens?
Brains can be used like a "stress ball," but only once.
Re: Korg and Roland -- old again
Innovation is overrated. What synth manufacturers should be doing is perfecting what they have already done before instead of wasting time on silly touchscreens, LCDs, and lights which don't really improve musicianship. All these so called innovations do is give you more buttons to press and menus to cycle through instead of facilitating music writing. More options will not move us forward. But refinement will.
I say backwards is the way forwards if it means having to go back and redo and perfect the MS20, Arp 2600, and Pro-One. I really like the approach that Moog and DSI did with the Voyager Classic and Mopho kb.
Leave wild unfettered innovation to Buchla (just kidding).
I say backwards is the way forwards if it means having to go back and redo and perfect the MS20, Arp 2600, and Pro-One. I really like the approach that Moog and DSI did with the Voyager Classic and Mopho kb.
Leave wild unfettered innovation to Buchla (just kidding).
-
- Active Member
- Posts: 360
- Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 5:34 am
- Gear: Juno 106, Tetra, Mopho Keyboard, Little Phatty Stage II, RX-5, Volcas, JX-3P, R5, 505, TX-7, D550, TX81Z, Korg MS-20 Mini, Minibrute, Six Traks, TR-8
- Contact:
Re: Korg and Roland -- old again
spot on.RD9 wrote:Innovation is overrated. What synth manufacturers should be doing is perfecting what they have already done before instead of wasting time on silly touchscreens, LCDs, and lights which don't really improve musicianship. All these so called innovations do is give you more buttons to press and menus to cycle through instead of facilitating music writing. More options will not move us forward. But refinement will.
I say backwards is the way forwards if it means having to go back and redo and perfect the MS20, Arp 2600, and Pro-One. I really like the approach that Moog and DSI did with the Voyager Classic and Mopho kb.
Leave wild unfettered innovation to Buchla (just kidding).
- Phollop Willing PA
- Senior Member
- Posts: 840
- Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 3:47 pm
- Gear: Korg, Moog, Roland, Alesis, ARP, Yamaha, Future Retro
- Location: Nova Scotia
Re: Korg and Roland -- old again
Couldn't agree more and one more thing, do it before I die, please!!!!Kidney05 wrote:spot on.RD9 wrote:Innovation is overrated. What synth manufacturers should be doing is perfecting what they have already done before instead of wasting time on silly touchscreens, LCDs, and lights which don't really improve musicianship. All these so called innovations do is give you more buttons to press and menus to cycle through instead of facilitating music writing. More options will not move us forward. But refinement will.
I say backwards is the way forwards if it means having to go back and redo and perfect the MS20, Arp 2600, and Pro-One. I really like the approach that Moog and DSI did with the Voyager Classic and Mopho kb.
Leave wild unfettered innovation to Buchla (just kidding).
MOOGSig: Voyager/Theremin, ROLAND: JP8000/MC505/MC50/SH1000/Octapad1/RE 20, CASIO VLtone, KORG: Prophecy/MS2000R/Kaos Pad2/D3200/D888/SDD4000/M3, BOSS SP202/DR110, YAMAHA:CS40M/QX7/WX7/QY10/Reface DX, ARP Exp, MACBETH M5, FR ORB, SONNET, ALESIS SR18
- meatballfulton
- Moderator
- Posts: 6129
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 9:29 pm
- Gear: Logic Pro X
Re: Korg and Roland -- old again
What's wrong with touchscreens? If you have to have menus it's a good solution, especially if you can move virtual knobs and sliders.
What's wrong with lighted controls? Useful on dark stages.
Want something to help with musicianship, how about more performance controllers? I don't need 200 dedicated knobs, I want controls that can be mapped to what I want to be able to control...more expression pedal inputs, more than one mod wheel, joysticks, XY pads, whatever.
I don't want old analogs reissued unless they have MIDI and patch memories added like the Moogs (notice how the Voyager OS was a sales bust?).
Hey, I love the old synths but I like living in the modern world. Leave the big 3 behind and support the smaller companies that do old-school analog if that's what you want. Bought a new SEM yet? How about one of the many new modular brands out there (I like my dotcom)?
Start saving for that crazy analog poly shown at Messe
What's wrong with lighted controls? Useful on dark stages.
Want something to help with musicianship, how about more performance controllers? I don't need 200 dedicated knobs, I want controls that can be mapped to what I want to be able to control...more expression pedal inputs, more than one mod wheel, joysticks, XY pads, whatever.
I don't want old analogs reissued unless they have MIDI and patch memories added like the Moogs (notice how the Voyager OS was a sales bust?).
Hey, I love the old synths but I like living in the modern world. Leave the big 3 behind and support the smaller companies that do old-school analog if that's what you want. Bought a new SEM yet? How about one of the many new modular brands out there (I like my dotcom)?
Start saving for that crazy analog poly shown at Messe

I listened to Hatfield and the North at Rainbow. They were very wonderful and they made my heart a prisoner.
- tallowwaters
- Moderator
- Posts: 4998
- Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 4:11 am
- Gear: LC-MS/MS
- Location: snake's belly in a wagon rut
Re: Korg and Roland -- old again
Yeah, those silly touchscreens making everything insanely easy to edit, nothing like naming patches by via scrolling through the alpha numeric menu via a knob. Then those assholes, that practically owe us everything because we complain about them on this forum, have the nerve to give us all sorts of options for sound synthesis that require a few button presses to find. The nerve! It's like they expect us not to rehash the same s**t over and over and over and over. Don't they realize all other music ended after that Lucky Man solo?RD9 wrote:Innovation is overrated. What synth manufacturers should be doing is perfecting what they have already done before instead of wasting time on silly touchscreens, LCDs, and lights which don't really improve musicianship. All these so called innovations do is give you more buttons to press and menus to cycle through instead of facilitating music writing. More options will not move us forward. But refinement will.

Brains can be used like a "stress ball," but only once.