Most Unreliable, Finicky Digital Synth?
Forum rules
READ: VSE Board-Wide Rules and Guidelines
READ: VSE Board-Wide Rules and Guidelines
- samuraipizzacat29
- Supporting Member!
- Posts: 819
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:40 pm
- Real name: Nate
Most Unreliable, Finicky Digital Synth?
I didn't find a thread for this, so I figured I'd start one. What would you consider are the most finicky, unreliable digital synths you have owned or come across?
Mine is the fizmo. This is a real enigma of a digital synth. It's both the best and worst design of any digital synth I've come across.
On one hand:
1)voltage regulator is dead wrong (who uses a 9v AC adapter anyway?)
2)knobs are flimsy
3) ensoniq is obviously out of business
4)display is awful.
5) overall semi-cheap construction (and yet it's a heavy synth????)
6) 80s paint scheme
7) ugh- that display should be mentioned twice
on the other hand:
1) TRANSWAVES!
2) 4 PT MULTI-TIMBRAL!
3) KNOBS!
4) VOCODER!
edit: 4.5) 24 BIT EFFECTS! (right? I'm not near my manual or synth, I know they're quality though)
5) BEING THE COOLEST GUY AROUND BECAUSE YOU ACTUALLY HAVE ONE! (I embellish)
It just strikes me that this synth can somehow be the best and worst of so many worlds at the same time. So I wonder if there's any other digital synths that are as oddball, or just a total PITA to deal with their little idiosyncrasies as the old fiz. I'd like to narrow it down to digital, because for all intents and purposes, digital synths are supposed to be stable little bundles of joy rather than worrying if it's going to burn to death at any moment (fizmo). And yes, I've replaced the regulator, so mine's not going to die for a while i hope.....
Mine is the fizmo. This is a real enigma of a digital synth. It's both the best and worst design of any digital synth I've come across.
On one hand:
1)voltage regulator is dead wrong (who uses a 9v AC adapter anyway?)
2)knobs are flimsy
3) ensoniq is obviously out of business
4)display is awful.
5) overall semi-cheap construction (and yet it's a heavy synth????)
6) 80s paint scheme
7) ugh- that display should be mentioned twice
on the other hand:
1) TRANSWAVES!
2) 4 PT MULTI-TIMBRAL!
3) KNOBS!
4) VOCODER!
edit: 4.5) 24 BIT EFFECTS! (right? I'm not near my manual or synth, I know they're quality though)
5) BEING THE COOLEST GUY AROUND BECAUSE YOU ACTUALLY HAVE ONE! (I embellish)
It just strikes me that this synth can somehow be the best and worst of so many worlds at the same time. So I wonder if there's any other digital synths that are as oddball, or just a total PITA to deal with their little idiosyncrasies as the old fiz. I'd like to narrow it down to digital, because for all intents and purposes, digital synths are supposed to be stable little bundles of joy rather than worrying if it's going to burn to death at any moment (fizmo). And yes, I've replaced the regulator, so mine's not going to die for a while i hope.....
Re: Most Unreliable, Finicky Digital Synth?
D-70 hands down (and it's a pitty)
- samuraipizzacat29
- Supporting Member!
- Posts: 819
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:40 pm
- Real name: Nate
Re: Most Unreliable, Finicky Digital Synth?
explanation? I meant to discuss it for the world's edification and also for the sake of gear talk fun....
Re: Most Unreliable, Finicky Digital Synth?
Did you ever crash your synth? because D-70 could crash at any time and moment.samuraipizzacat29 wrote:explanation? I meant to discuss it for the world's edification and also for the sake of gear talk fun....
It had really awkward MIDI control, really messed up patch editing (spreadsheets come to mind) - although with ROM and board revisions they've improved. Plus, not really a D-series...
Last edited by ItsMeOnly on Fri Jul 15, 2011 8:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- meatballfulton
- Moderator
- Posts: 6097
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 9:29 pm
- Gear: Logic Pro X
Re: Most Unreliable, Finicky Digital Synth?
Red Sound eleVAta...on paper a capable VA synth with expansion options. Only the expansion options never shipped, the synth was buggy and the company tanked. I bought one for $150 used and found that it would lock up after playing it for a few minutes. Paid for an OS upgrade chipset, installed it and it would still lock up. I sold it to a guy who already owned 3 of them and told me he never had problems...


I listened to Hatfield and the North at Rainbow. They were very wonderful and they made my heart a prisoner.
- samuraipizzacat29
- Supporting Member!
- Posts: 819
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:40 pm
- Real name: Nate
Re: Most Unreliable, Finicky Digital Synth?
haha great! that's exactly what I wanted to know. Synth crashing is by far the worst feeling in the world. IDK how many times I've experienced total buzzkill by power drop, synth restart, etc. If we're talking about that realm - then vsthost (or any DAW i've tried for that matter, or any of my pcs too....) absolutely kills me. I'll have an awesome vst and crazy effect chain going, and then i miswire one thing and BAM! it's all gone. I hate you vsthost. Yet I love you. That's what I'm takling about - love/hate relationshipItsMeOnly wrote: Did you ever crash your synth? because D-70 could crash at any time and moment.
It had really awkward MIDI control, really messed up patch editing - although with ROM and board revisions they've improved. Plus, not really a D-series...

Yes! exactly what I wanted to know. I was checking one out a week or so ago, and thought it looked pretty rad (or at least worth buying cheap if I found one), but now i'll mostly reconsider. Opinion on the other redsound products? darkstar? been after one of them too.meatballfulton wrote:Red Sound eleVAta
That's the whole point - these synths that on paper should be stable, but in real life just aren't. Nice work.
- garranimal
- Synth Explorer
- Posts: 1728
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 8:57 pm
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: Most Unreliable, Finicky Digital Synth?
While the JX-10 has great analog sound imho, but the original operating system is poorly written, extremely buggy and it too would crash seemingly without warning or provocation. At the time of its release, external midi controller support was non-existent. Colin Frasier offers a greatly improved OS which adds midi-controller support, to which you can burn your own Eeproms for improved performance.
- samuraipizzacat29
- Supporting Member!
- Posts: 819
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:40 pm
- Real name: Nate
Re: Most Unreliable, Finicky Digital Synth?
Any probs with your andromeda os? I've heard (a few) complaints about those.
Also, while we're here and you have a venom: the output went distorted on mine. Sent it back and got it repaired no problem, but seems to fit the bill and thought u might like to know.
Also, while we're here and you have a venom: the output went distorted on mine. Sent it back and got it repaired no problem, but seems to fit the bill and thought u might like to know.
- rhino
- Supporting Member!
- Posts: 2611
- Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 5:00 pm
- Real name: bill
- Gear: keepers:
Kurzweil K2500x
Ensoniq TS-12
Yamaha SY-99
Alesis QS-8
Roland JD-800
Roland JX-10
Akai AX-80
Ensoniq SQ-80
Korg DSS-1
Moog Mini
Fizmo - Location: kentucky hills
Re: Most Unreliable, Finicky Digital Synth?
Never owned any of these, but I heard that three of the worst may be:
1) ARP Avatar. Said to have had about a 200% failure rate - that is almost every unit was sent back to ARP for repair at least twice.
2) MOOG Polymoog. Bleeding-edge technology plus clueless non-Moog techs resulted in ultra-short MTBFs.
3) Siel DS-2. Poor quality capacitors and bad soldering QC sank this one.
4) Not the same --- but I wish KORG had invested in metal or plastic cabinets on the PolySix: One good bump or one spilled drink and the fakewood crumbled back to sawdust.
1) ARP Avatar. Said to have had about a 200% failure rate - that is almost every unit was sent back to ARP for repair at least twice.
2) MOOG Polymoog. Bleeding-edge technology plus clueless non-Moog techs resulted in ultra-short MTBFs.
3) Siel DS-2. Poor quality capacitors and bad soldering QC sank this one.
4) Not the same --- but I wish KORG had invested in metal or plastic cabinets on the PolySix: One good bump or one spilled drink and the fakewood crumbled back to sawdust.
When the wise man points to the stars, the fool looks at the finger.
- Confucius
- Confucius
- D-Collector
- Expert Member
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 3:01 pm
- Location: Norway
Re: Most Unreliable, Finicky Digital Synth?
Really? I've been lusting for a P6 for a long time but there's nothing I hate more than poor build quality. I got rid of my JX-8P two years ago because it would bend and warp in every axis, even though it was in very good general condition. Plastic and wood, how I hate that combination.rhino wrote:4) Not the same --- but I wish KORG had invested in metal or plastic cabinets on the PolySix: One good bump or one spilled drink and the fakewood crumbled back to sawdust.
Re: Most Unreliable, Finicky Digital Synth?
This isn't a first hand experience...
Also, a sampler...
The ensoniq EPS 16+
apparently lots of fun crash error messages after significant usage time.
I remember reading a page where a guy did a DIY fan installation to stop overheating problems.
Also, a sampler...
The ensoniq EPS 16+
apparently lots of fun crash error messages after significant usage time.
I remember reading a page where a guy did a DIY fan installation to stop overheating problems.
- samuraipizzacat29
- Supporting Member!
- Posts: 819
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:40 pm
- Real name: Nate
Re: Most Unreliable, Finicky Digital Synth?
Thanks - but I'm mostly looking for digital synths with strange quirkiness no one would expect for this thread. Although as an aside, the polymoog is the saddest failure of a synth of all time. I can't wait to get mine back from the tech to tool around on it (i got it only slightly broken and for cheap) but it's just sad it's feared instead of venerated.rhino wrote:Never owned any of these, but I heard that three of the worst may be:
1) ARP Avatar. Said to have had about a 200% failure rate - that is almost every unit was sent back to ARP for repair at least twice.
2) MOOG Polymoog. Bleeding-edge technology plus clueless non-Moog techs resulted in ultra-short MTBFs.
3) Siel DS-2. Poor quality capacitors and bad soldering QC sank this one.
4) Not the same --- but I wish KORG had invested in metal or plastic cabinets on the PolySix: One good bump or one spilled drink and the fakewood crumbled back to sawdust.
samplers count. That's a strange machine in general. Probably an awesome addition to this thread. It's ultra-useable, but has a lot of quirks. Especially considering scsi and floppy are dead to the world. Idk how you could possibly load 8 parts of useable samples in only a 2mb memory. Also, it confused the poop out of me loading/saving samples, sequences, performances, etc as different types of information and being on different disks. Besides figuring out the output expander. The lcd/ui wasn't "too bad" but the machine's definitely quirky and not without operational issues.MitchXI wrote:The ensoniq EPS 16+
oh and another thing on the eps16+ is that certain sources on the web say the filters are analog - manual says digital, and they really sound digital to me. so afaik i'd consider them digital filters.
Ironic it's an ensoniq again...
- Automatic Gainsay
- Synth Explorer
- Posts: 3962
- Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:22 am
- Real name: Marc Doty
- Gear: Minimoog, 2600, CS-15, CS-50, MiniBrute, MicroBrute, S2, Korg MS-20 Mini, 3 Volcas, Pro 2, Leipzig, Pianet T, Wurli 7300, Wurli 145-A, ASR-10, e6400.
- Band: Godfrey's Cordial
- Location: Tacoma
- Contact:
Re: Most Unreliable, Finicky Digital Synth?
The Avatar I had fit that description. It would operate fine if I hit it in one particular place on the metal panel. Specifically one place. Despite the fact that when you opened it up (the thing opens like a hinged box), there was nothing IN that particular place.rhino wrote: 1) ARP Avatar. Said to have had about a 200% failure rate - that is almost every unit was sent back to ARP for repair at least twice.
Sorry that that's OT.
1. A panned mono sample is just as good as a stereo sample. I had the 4mb upgrade on mine, but I still recorded entire songs with loops, samples, etc. with that 4mbs. People are spoiled today, and have the impression that super-high resolution full-stereo samples are necessary... and they're just not.samuraipizzacat29 wrote: samplers count. That's a strange machine in general. Probably an awesome addition to this thread. It's ultra-useable, but has a lot of quirks. Especially considering scsi and floppy are dead to the world. Idk how you could possibly load 8 parts of useable samples in only a 2mb memory. Also, it confused the poop out of me loading/saving samples, sequences, performances, etc as different types of information and being on different disks. Besides figuring out the output expander. The lcd/ui wasn't "too bad" but the machine's definitely quirky and not without operational issues.
oh and another thing on the eps16+ is that certain sources on the web say the filters are analog - manual says digital, and they really sound digital to me. so afaik i'd consider them digital filters.
Ironic it's an ensoniq again...
2. SCSI is dead, but that isn't to say there aren't many SCSI opportunities still to be found. And believe me, you WANT to go the SCSI route with the EPS 16+
3. My EPS-16+ was VERY quirky to begin with... crashed a LOT. But over time, it seemed to get more stable. It started crashing again late in its life, and it was very depressing. I ended up giving up on it and buying another sampler. When THAT sampler failed because of a poor power source, I was forced to go back to the EPS-16+ while it was being fixed. It turned out that the douchebag who installed my SCSI card didn't screw it in place, which resulted in that card shifting back and forth which dirtied the contacts. After cleaning the contacts and screwing it in place, the thing worked flawlessly. Mostly, the EPS-16+ has a way it wants things done, and you have to learn its language. Once you do, it becomes much more trustworthy.
4. The best thing to do in regard to saving with the EPS-16+ is find one with the SCSI upgrade, and save to disk. Then, the next best thing is to save as Banks. You save the whole song with the song's name, and then when you load the song, it loads all relevant material. It takes very little effort to save or load that way.
"I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." -Charles Babbage
"Unity and Mediocrity are forever in bed together." -Zane W.
http://www.youtube.com/automaticgainsay
"Unity and Mediocrity are forever in bed together." -Zane W.
http://www.youtube.com/automaticgainsay
- silikon
- Supporting Member!
- Posts: 1247
- Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 1:21 am
- Real name: Ms. Jackson
- Gear: Random bullshit with knobs and buttons.
- Band: Year with no summer
- Location: East.
- Contact:
Re: Most Unreliable, Finicky Digital Synth?
Radikal Spectralis 2.
Beautiful machine, wicked powerful DSP.... OS that was rife with bugs.
But hands down the worst digital machine (you said you included hardware samplers) the Akai MPC4000.
God I loved to hate that machine. Worthy of the "allow me to introduce you to the pavement repeatedly" award.
See also THIS.
Beautiful machine, wicked powerful DSP.... OS that was rife with bugs.
...While it's not "digital" (at least what I think you're terming digital as a VA or DSP driven synth versus analog architecture, i've never had it lock up, or act squirrel-like.samuraipizzacat29 wrote:Any probs with your andromeda os? I've heard (a few) complaints about those.
But hands down the worst digital machine (you said you included hardware samplers) the Akai MPC4000.
God I loved to hate that machine. Worthy of the "allow me to introduce you to the pavement repeatedly" award.
See also THIS.
echo 1 > /dev/awesome
- vinyl_junkie
- Junior Member
- Posts: 223
- Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 1:41 pm
- Gear: Akai samplers
- Location: Somewhere in the countryside, UK
Re: Most Unreliable, Finicky Digital Synth?
In the Avatar they used a kind of lube for the faders which corded the contacts, good stuff eh
I read this in a book from 1993 called Vintage Synthesizers
The EPS-16+ is a awesome machine, people are indeed spoilt now days... Mine is 2MB and it's more than enough for complete songs.
I mean remember guys who made complete records on SP-1200's? less than 10 seconds sample time there...
The thing with it crashing is not a issue.
When I got it, she would crash all the time on a daily basis... So I contacted a tech dude who told me a lot of Ensoniq products he services have dry joints on the PSU.
Ever since I have re-worked the PSU connectors and cleaned the pins with a fibreglass pen I have not had a single crash or freeze... And I have used it for a long time in a hot environment.
I'm surprised no one mentioned Waldorf yet... I mean the early OS on most of their synths was unusable cough Q and look at the Blofeld now mind a lot better than what it was it's still VERY annoying.. the OS sucks, the output sucks (Some one modified it with a digital out and it sounded sweet) and so does the build quality in general but like the Fizmo..it's a wicked synth
I read this in a book from 1993 called Vintage Synthesizers
The EPS-16+ is a awesome machine, people are indeed spoilt now days... Mine is 2MB and it's more than enough for complete songs.
I mean remember guys who made complete records on SP-1200's? less than 10 seconds sample time there...
The thing with it crashing is not a issue.
When I got it, she would crash all the time on a daily basis... So I contacted a tech dude who told me a lot of Ensoniq products he services have dry joints on the PSU.
Ever since I have re-worked the PSU connectors and cleaned the pins with a fibreglass pen I have not had a single crash or freeze... And I have used it for a long time in a hot environment.
I'm surprised no one mentioned Waldorf yet... I mean the early OS on most of their synths was unusable cough Q and look at the Blofeld now mind a lot better than what it was it's still VERY annoying.. the OS sucks, the output sucks (Some one modified it with a digital out and it sounded sweet) and so does the build quality in general but like the Fizmo..it's a wicked synth
Last edited by vinyl_junkie on Sat Jul 16, 2011 2:24 am, edited 1 time in total.