Re: Arturia MiniBrute - analog monosynth
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 9:11 pm
A dude on muff mailed Arturia and got a confirmed shipping date of late March/early April.
Synthesizer Discussion Forums
http://forum.vintagesynth.com/
duh bra, Moog MEANS "pHaT"!!!Automatic Gainsay wrote:This post is lacking in the sense that "phat" is nowhere in evidence.Sir Ruff wrote:But dude, this is AN-O-LOG! Str8 up Moog-style!Stab Frenzy wrote:Microkorg totally owns the Minibrute!
What I was getting at is when the Mopho was bashed for not having a multimode. I myself rather like a 2 pole to be honest, the SEM is one of my favourite synths of all timeAutomatic Gainsay wrote: Ha ha, to me, this is like saying "you can only play one note."
Plenty of our most beloved synths are two pole!
A multimode filter should now be the norm for any serious synth module. But owning a SEM myself makes me wonder about the necessity of getting a MiniBrute; Morphing a 2 pole LPF + notch or notch + HPF is even better than having just a regular multimode.Synthacon wrote:What I was getting at is when the Mopho was bashed for not having a multimode. I myself rather like a 2 pole to be honest, the SEM is one of my favourite synths of all timeAutomatic Gainsay wrote: Ha ha, to me, this is like saying "you can only play one note."
Plenty of our most beloved synths are two pole!Just makes me smirk at the slack Arturia are getting that maybe a regular synth maker may have had a bit gripe aimed towards them in the last couple of years. Or maybe the forums are growing up
![]()
It is possibly one of the only synths for a number of years that makes me want to go and buy it straight away.
Yeah, it's perverse how intent most synth manufacturers are in re-hashing the same goddam filter that's been floating around for the last 40 years or so. I can definitely see overlap with the SEM here, but the wave options definitely add something to the mix.Scories wrote:A multimode filter should now be the norm for any serious synth module. But owning a SEM myself makes me wonder about the necessity of getting a MiniBrute; Morphing a 2 pole LPF + notch or notch + HPF is even better than having just a regular multimode.Synthacon wrote:What I was getting at is when the Mopho was bashed for not having a multimode. I myself rather like a 2 pole to be honest, the SEM is one of my favourite synths of all timeAutomatic Gainsay wrote: Ha ha, to me, this is like saying "you can only play one note."
Plenty of our most beloved synths are two pole!Just makes me smirk at the slack Arturia are getting that maybe a regular synth maker may have had a bit gripe aimed towards them in the last couple of years. Or maybe the forums are growing up
![]()
It is possibly one of the only synths for a number of years that makes me want to go and buy it straight away.
Otherwise, I'd prefer a dual multimode filter or a multimode followed by a resonant bpf just like the SH-5.
Anyway, having a sh-101 + a SEM makes leaves little GAS for buyeing a Minibrute.
ermm bass? Derr hahaFX23 wrote:whats the difference between a minitaur and phatty soundwise?
What better interface can you have than to actually turn the knobs on the synth itself ?polar69 wrote:Watching the namm videos etc I notice a lack of any sort of gui or web based editor. Is that correct ? Everything must be controlled via the synth itself ?
How retro is that ?