Re: Arturia MiniBrute - analog monosynth
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:52 pm
DV247
Synthesizer Discussion Forums
http://forum.vintagesynth.com/
How are they sneaking it in? Guided Tour section of the Minibrute page, last section under VCO.vox345 wrote:I don’t trust companies sneaking in digi parts that might be overlooked once they say it’s 100% analog signal or because it’s more affordable but is basically the same. The assurance that everything’s analog is good to bypass learning all the complex stuff about what digi parts are okay if you want it totally analog everything. Learning the real difference what an analog synth can do that a digi can’t is a whole other thing and doesn’t take a just a couple days to get out of the way like I hoped.
Sneaking in? really?vox345 wrote:I don’t trust companies sneaking in digi parts that might be overlooked once they say it’s 100% analog signal or because it’s more affordable but is basically the same. The assurance that everything’s analog is good to bypass learning all the complex stuff about what digi parts are okay if you want it totally analog everything. Learning the real difference what an analog synth can do that a digi can’t is a whole other thing and doesn’t take a just a couple days to get out of the way like I hoped.
So you didn't realise polysynths had individual filters for each voice but you're definitely savvy enough about the inner workings to know a digital LFO is just not on and they're sneaking in digital parts?vox345 wrote: I don’t trust companies sneaking in digi parts that might be overlooked once they say it’s 100% analog signal or because it’s more affordable but is basically the same. The assurance that everything’s analog is good to bypass learning all the complex stuff about what digi parts are okay if you want it totally analog everything. Learning the real difference what an analog synth can do that a digi can’t is a whole other thing and doesn’t take a just a couple days to get out of the way like I hoped.
now, I'm just thinking off the top of my head, but the reason analog oscillators is important is the way the harmonics fall/actual shape of the wave made. This is how we know it's a good sound-- a digital oscillator is only so many pictures of the actual wave it's trying to make, and because of how sensitive our ear is to these waves, we can distinguish analog and digital oscillators pretty easily (usually, sometimes digital waves sound great and analog ones sound crappy). The continuous analog wave sounds prettier to our ears (again, usually), and it's really important because these waves are travelling at 60 hz and up-- all in the audio spectrum-- the way the sampling falls in digital waves can be heard.vox345 wrote:just hoping someone can elaorate about digi vs analog lfo quick w/o detouring thread. people in thread i linked say it's different enough to mention.
Your sarcasm detector seems to be functioning particularly well at the moment.vox345 wrote:just hoping someone can elaorate about digi vs analog lfo quick w/o detouring thread. people in thread i linked say it's different enough to mention.
Have you had a recent hearing test? Just wondering b/c your responses on this thread make me question your hearingtekkentool wrote:Sounds like microchips.
Am I wrong to say aliasing/sampling falls can't be head on some digi synths and with that aside, everything an analog does that a digi can't like fatness, grittyness, warmth, lushness (added harmonic layers that can be created with a digi synth then layered ), pitch drifts, unpredictability/randomly changing paramaters/random changes during flter sweeps, etc can be created digitally and sound the same afterall?Kidney05 wrote:vox345 wrote:
just hoping someone can elaorate about digi vs analog lfo quick w/o detouring thread. people in thread i linked say it's different enough to mention.
now, I'm just thinking off the top of my head, but the reason analog oscillators is important is the way the harmonics fall/actual shape of the wave made. This is how we know it's a good sound-- a digital oscillator is only so many pictures of the actual wave it's trying to make, and because of how sensitive our ear is to these waves, we can distinguish analog and digital oscillators pretty easily (usually, sometimes digital waves sound great and analog ones sound crappy). The continuous analog wave sounds prettier to our ears (again, usually), and it's really important because these waves are travelling at 60 hz and up-- all in the audio spectrum-- the way the sampling falls in digital waves can be heard.
As far as LFOs go, you're not worried about the harmonics usually-- you're only worried about the shape, and in this case, the shape is close enough to the real wave it's trying to attain that it doesn't make a difference. A 10hz digital wave editing cutoff frequency sounds the same as a digital wave doing the same to the human ear, i'd guess. Now, it complicates things once you take those LFO's up into the audio frequency, but for the most part, those digital LFO's should take care of most applications of the LFO just fine.
does that sound about right to anyone else