Aw, it's a common enough s**tstorm, happens over and over all around teh interwebz on a regular basis.Aaron2 wrote:Wow, I really started a s**t-storm here, didn't I?
A concise explanation of digital vs. analog?
Forum rules
READ: VSE Board-Wide Rules and Guidelines
READ: VSE Board-Wide Rules and Guidelines
-
meatballfulton
- Moderator
- Posts: 6126
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 9:29 pm
- Gear: Logic Pro X
Re: A concise explanation of digital vs. analog?
I listened to Hatfield and the North at Rainbow. They were very wonderful and they made my heart a prisoner.
-
Black Tomorrow
- Active Member
- Posts: 367
- Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 7:52 am
- Real name: kp Catalano
- Gear: MG-1, V-Synth w/ VC1, Poly800, PSR740, Triton, SHS10, Boss DR770, Stylophone, Hammond M-143, acoustic piano, reed organ, didgeridoo, Garritan library.
- Location: North Carolina
- Contact:
Re: A concise explanation of digital vs. analog?
Perhaps, but I know that wasn't your intent. I think when people see the phrase "digital vs. analog" it's bound to cause a fit. But whereas most "digital vs. analog" threads draw battle lines asking which is better (and thus, deserve the resulting shitstorm), it seems to me you're simply trying to understand the actual mechanics behind the two, which is commendable. Perhaps someone here can point out an unbiased source that explains the difference. My apologies, as I cannot point out such a source.Aaron2 wrote:Wow, I really started a s**t-storm here, didn't I?
You can't synthesize love
-
madtheory
- Supporting Member!
- Posts: 5418
- Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 12:45 pm
- Real name: Tomas Mulcahy
- Gear: Wurlitzer Opus 1536, Model F, Morovdis Arpeggiator, Maplin My First EQ, Jeff Wayne Thunderchild rack, Thermostat, Buck Owens' Moog.
- Location: Cork, Ireland
- Contact:
Re: A concise explanation of digital vs. analog?
This is not at all concise, but it is un-biased:
http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/may98/a ... gital.html
http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/may98/a ... gital.html