Yep, I'd say you're right therepflosi wrote:Well that's where the quality is atHybrid88 wrote:low volume modular manufacturers

Yep, I'd say you're right therepflosi wrote:Well that's where the quality is atHybrid88 wrote:low volume modular manufacturers
This is a bit of a fallacy, the thing here is that SMT makes building PCBs much cheaper than it costs to have a tech faultfind, diagnose and replace a part, so companies will just replace the board which has the issue rather than fix the board. This doesn't mean the board can't be fixed! Desoldering SMDs is actually quite easy (well discrete devices anyway, BGAs are a different story, but they don't really have a through hole equivalent anyway) if you have the right tools, provided the board is laid out in a way where you can get the thing which needs to be replaced.Hybrid88 wrote:Ok, it's probably pretty pointless trying to argue about it, you guys all seem to know everything already. But the fact is if you take something in to be repaired that is SMD construction the tech will most likely not be able to do a component level fix. Let along a diagnosis. I don't know about you but I'd rather replace one component than a whole PCB.Automatic Gainsay wrote:At Gearfest, I saw Dave Smith mock everyone who is concerned about surface-mount technology, and watched Tom Oberheim and Roger Linn laugh along.
After that, I kind of want to never hear about it again.
Sure there's a warranty on most stuff now...
SMD is pretty reliable, but when it does fail it will brick a synth.
You misunderstood what I said, it's easier to replace an SMT resistor than a through hole one. Same for caps, most transistors etc.Hybrid88 wrote:^ Well it's like anything, it might be possible with a lot of effort but practically in the real world is another matter.
Most techs I can think of are getting older, and just won't touch it. Also the lead-free solder makes it even harder. I don't know, I guess they are improvements of the actual manufacture process of the product but it does make things harder for the hobbyist.
What? I'd have to definitely disagree there. You're dealing with something the size of a grain of rice, with no mechanical strength without solder, it's fiddly at best. Then theres the increased chance of tiny solder bridges because of the circuit density (even seeing those is difficult, let alone finding them) add to that the fact that it will be using lead free solder... not what I'd call easier.Stab Frenzy wrote:You misunderstood what I said, it's easier to replace an SMT resistor than a through hole one. Same for caps, most transistors etc.Hybrid88 wrote:^ Well it's like anything, it might be possible with a lot of effort but practically in the real world is another matter.
Most techs I can think of are getting older, and just won't touch it. Also the lead-free solder makes it even harder. I don't know, I guess they are improvements of the actual manufacture process of the product but it does make things harder for the hobbyist.
Exactly, just pick it up with a pair of these:Hybrid88 wrote:You're dealing with something the size of a grain of rice, with no mechanical strength without solder
Well, digital logic is older than even the early modulars. And it wasn't used much in analog synthesizers, but for a budget-conscious monosynth it makes sense, since you can implement a ring-modulation between two pulse waves with a single exclusive-OR gate.zmd wrote:So the ring modulator is digital? Sont get me wrong, I don't care, but I'm surprised based on the age!