Waldorf Streichfett

Discussions about anything analog, digital, MIDI, synth technology, techniques, theories and more.
bowenstidger
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 12:46 am

Re: Waldorf Streichfett

Post by bowenstidger » Sun Mar 09, 2014 8:18 pm

is there no filter on this or am i tripping

User avatar
syntheticsolutions
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 325
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2011 11:04 pm
Real name: Ryan
Gear: Rhodes 78 Mk2, Jupiter 4, Juno 6, MS-10, CS-15, Opus 3, Machinedrum, RE-501, Roland Rack
Band: Lunar Modular
Location: UK

Re: Waldorf Streichfett

Post by syntheticsolutions » Sun Mar 09, 2014 9:21 pm

:yahoo:

Sign me up!
Replicants are like any other machine, they're either a benefit or a hazard. If they're a benefit, its not my problem.

User avatar
chimney chop
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 309
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 5:46 am
Band: boxc, cigarettes after sex
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Re: Waldorf Streichfett

Post by chimney chop » Sun Mar 09, 2014 9:50 pm

bowenstidger wrote:is there no filter on this or am i tripping
looks that way.

shame

User avatar
Automatic Gainsay
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
Posts: 3962
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:22 am
Real name: Marc Doty
Gear: Minimoog, 2600, CS-15, CS-50, MiniBrute, MicroBrute, S2, Korg MS-20 Mini, 3 Volcas, Pro 2, Leipzig, Pianet T, Wurli 7300, Wurli 145-A, ASR-10, e6400.
Band: Godfrey's Cordial
Location: Tacoma
Contact:

Re: Waldorf Streichfett

Post by Automatic Gainsay » Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:48 pm

Their description of it doesn't mention analog at all.
If it isn't analog... what does it do that pretty much any digital/software polysynth couldn't do?
String synths just produce saw waves, and they usually do it paraphonically. So, what you're looking at is an extremely limited synthesizer without any synthesis functions that can only really do one thing (and without individual voice articulation)... something that any polysynth can already do. Most string synths depend entirely on how good the effect covers up how boring they are... so this had better have an awesome set of effects. But even so... aren't there some pretty amazing software effects out there right now?
‎"I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." -Charles Babbage
"Unity and Mediocrity are forever in bed together." -Zane W.
http://www.youtube.com/automaticgainsay

User avatar
Sir Nose
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 785
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 3:54 pm
Real name: Bob
Gear: Machinedrum, Octatrack, Moog LP, x0xb0x, Elka Solist 505, Simmons SDS-400
Location: PA

Re: Waldorf Streichfett

Post by Sir Nose » Mon Mar 10, 2014 12:30 am

$400

Cheaper than an Elkorus, but I'll wait to hear it before deciding if the savings is worth it.
Funkadelic wrote: nothing is good unless you play with it
all that is good is nasty

User avatar
calaverasgrande
Expert Member
Expert Member
Posts: 1038
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 5:29 pm
Gear: MG1, MP201, MF101, MF102, Taurus 3, SH09, KPR-77, Streichfett, Dark Energy, X0Xb0x, Dronelab, Synsonics Drums, Machinedrum, Modular.
Band: N.S.V.
Location: New York
Contact:

Re: Waldorf Streichfett

Post by calaverasgrande » Mon Mar 10, 2014 1:38 am

Automatic Gainsay wrote:Their description of it doesn't mention analog at all.
If it isn't analog... what does it do that pretty much any digital/software polysynth couldn't do?
String synths just produce saw waves, and they usually do it paraphonically. So, what you're looking at is an extremely limited synthesizer without any synthesis functions that can only really do one thing (and without individual voice articulation)... something that any polysynth can already do. Most string synths depend entirely on how good the effect covers up how boring they are... so this had better have an awesome set of effects. But even so... aren't there some pretty amazing software effects out there right now?
I think that while what you say is true, that is only true in a very general way.
I mean mac and cheese and fettuccine alfredo are the same thing in a very general way right?
If you look at a stringer as a synth, yeah it is pretty gosh darn boring.
But is not just about sound design. String machines may have been created as a cheap way for covers bands to pull off the sound of larger producitons. But they became an esthetic in their own right.
Though Kraftwerk, Jarre, Vangelis. Joy Division etc were probably just pulling out the string machines in their day because polyphony was expensive and doing chords with monosynths is time consuming.
Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it with all thy might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in the grave

User avatar
madmarkmagee
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 416
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 8:18 am
Gear: King Korg
ESQ-1
Reface DX
Microbrute
Shruthi-1
Pittsburgh System-1
Juno 106 (needs work)
Location: Sydney

Re: Waldorf Streichfett

Post by madmarkmagee » Mon Mar 10, 2014 2:57 am

calaverasgrande wrote:
Automatic Gainsay wrote:Their description of it doesn't mention analog at all.
If it isn't analog... what does it do that pretty much any digital/software polysynth couldn't do?
String synths just produce saw waves, and they usually do it paraphonically. So, what you're looking at is an extremely limited synthesizer without any synthesis functions that can only really do one thing (and without individual voice articulation)... something that any polysynth can already do. Most string synths depend entirely on how good the effect covers up how boring they are... so this had better have an awesome set of effects. But even so... aren't there some pretty amazing software effects out there right now?
I think that while what you say is true, that is only true in a very general way.
I mean mac and cheese and fettuccine alfredo are the same thing in a very general way right?
If you look at a stringer as a synth, yeah it is pretty gosh darn boring.
But is not just about sound design. String machines may have been created as a cheap way for covers bands to pull off the sound of larger producitons. But they became an esthetic in their own right.
Though Kraftwerk, Jarre, Vangelis. Joy Division etc were probably just pulling out the string machines in their day because polyphony was expensive and doing chords with monosynths is time consuming.
But I think the point that is being made is that the product seems like a waste of money if it is a digital string machine? I mean I'm sure their is plenty of software/romplers with vintage string machine patches. And they are probably better value?

That said, it could be a bloody brilliant sounding digital string machine. Then it would make sense to buy it? :lol:

User avatar
Automatic Gainsay
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
Posts: 3962
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:22 am
Real name: Marc Doty
Gear: Minimoog, 2600, CS-15, CS-50, MiniBrute, MicroBrute, S2, Korg MS-20 Mini, 3 Volcas, Pro 2, Leipzig, Pianet T, Wurli 7300, Wurli 145-A, ASR-10, e6400.
Band: Godfrey's Cordial
Location: Tacoma
Contact:

Re: Waldorf Streichfett

Post by Automatic Gainsay » Mon Mar 10, 2014 3:07 am

madmarkmagee wrote:
calaverasgrande wrote:
Automatic Gainsay wrote:Their description of it doesn't mention analog at all.
If it isn't analog... what does it do that pretty much any digital/software polysynth couldn't do?
String synths just produce saw waves, and they usually do it paraphonically. So, what you're looking at is an extremely limited synthesizer without any synthesis functions that can only really do one thing (and without individual voice articulation)... something that any polysynth can already do. Most string synths depend entirely on how good the effect covers up how boring they are... so this had better have an awesome set of effects. But even so... aren't there some pretty amazing software effects out there right now?
I think that while what you say is true, that is only true in a very general way.
I mean mac and cheese and fettuccine alfredo are the same thing in a very general way right?
If you look at a stringer as a synth, yeah it is pretty gosh darn boring.
But is not just about sound design. String machines may have been created as a cheap way for covers bands to pull off the sound of larger producitons. But they became an esthetic in their own right.
Though Kraftwerk, Jarre, Vangelis. Joy Division etc were probably just pulling out the string machines in their day because polyphony was expensive and doing chords with monosynths is time consuming.
But I think the point that is being made is that the product seems like a waste of money if it is a digital string machine? I mean I'm sure their is plenty of software/romplers with vintage string machine patches. And they are probably better value?

That said, it could be a bloody brilliant sounding digital string machine. Then it would make sense to buy it? :lol:
It is a waste of money if it is a digital string machine because there are billions of polyphonic digital synths that can produce a saw wave and have interesting effects. If you're cool with digital/software, why would you own digital synth software, and THEN feel compelled to buy this product? It doesn't make any sense.

If this product happens to have the greatest effects ever known to digital hardware, then so be it... but we don't know yet. And yet, everyone's like "I MUST HAVE THIS." It doesn't make any sense.
‎"I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." -Charles Babbage
"Unity and Mediocrity are forever in bed together." -Zane W.
http://www.youtube.com/automaticgainsay

User avatar
calaverasgrande
Expert Member
Expert Member
Posts: 1038
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 5:29 pm
Gear: MG1, MP201, MF101, MF102, Taurus 3, SH09, KPR-77, Streichfett, Dark Energy, X0Xb0x, Dronelab, Synsonics Drums, Machinedrum, Modular.
Band: N.S.V.
Location: New York
Contact:

Re: Waldorf Streichfett

Post by calaverasgrande » Mon Mar 10, 2014 3:48 am

Oh I get it, you guys are acting like Waldorf doesnt have any reputation of virtual analog a*s kickery.
haha lol
Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it with all thy might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in the grave

User avatar
Automatic Gainsay
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
Posts: 3962
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:22 am
Real name: Marc Doty
Gear: Minimoog, 2600, CS-15, CS-50, MiniBrute, MicroBrute, S2, Korg MS-20 Mini, 3 Volcas, Pro 2, Leipzig, Pianet T, Wurli 7300, Wurli 145-A, ASR-10, e6400.
Band: Godfrey's Cordial
Location: Tacoma
Contact:

Re: Waldorf Streichfett

Post by Automatic Gainsay » Mon Mar 10, 2014 3:52 am

calaverasgrande wrote:Oh I get it, you guys are acting like Waldorf doesnt have any reputation of virtual analog a*s kickery.
haha lol
I don't even know what would constitute "virtual analog a*s kickery." Wouldn't that mean it sounded analog?
What are you going to do with an extremely limited paraphonic saw wave generator that almost sounds like analog?
‎"I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." -Charles Babbage
"Unity and Mediocrity are forever in bed together." -Zane W.
http://www.youtube.com/automaticgainsay

User avatar
ninja6485
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
Posts: 2766
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:13 pm
Gear: Virus Ti, Jx-8p, Juno 60, Radias, Maschine, 101,303,606,707,727,808,909, odyssey, mirage, akai s5K/s2K/s1k, drumtraks, E6400ult, M1R, rx5, fizmo,d50
Band: Lyra, The Sun Worshipers
Location: Exton/ westchester

Re: Waldorf Streichfett

Post by ninja6485 » Mon Mar 10, 2014 4:23 am

Automatic Gainsay wrote:What are you going to do with an extremely limited paraphonic saw wave generator that almost sounds like analog?
Not give a s**t and use it as a stringer? :dontknow:
This looks like a psychotropic reaction. No wonder it's so popular...

User avatar
Automatic Gainsay
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
Posts: 3962
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:22 am
Real name: Marc Doty
Gear: Minimoog, 2600, CS-15, CS-50, MiniBrute, MicroBrute, S2, Korg MS-20 Mini, 3 Volcas, Pro 2, Leipzig, Pianet T, Wurli 7300, Wurli 145-A, ASR-10, e6400.
Band: Godfrey's Cordial
Location: Tacoma
Contact:

Re: Waldorf Streichfett

Post by Automatic Gainsay » Mon Mar 10, 2014 4:52 am

ninja6485 wrote:
Automatic Gainsay wrote:What are you going to do with an extremely limited paraphonic saw wave generator that almost sounds like analog?
Not give a s**t and use it as a stringer? :dontknow:
You don't have a synth that could do this same thing?
‎"I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." -Charles Babbage
"Unity and Mediocrity are forever in bed together." -Zane W.
http://www.youtube.com/automaticgainsay

User avatar
Bitexion
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
Posts: 4230
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2005 7:43 pm
Gear: Alesis Andromeda A6
Roland D-50
Creamware Minimax
Yamaha DX7s
Analogue Systems modular
Ensoniq SQ-80
Waldorf Blofeld
Location: Drammen, Norway

Re: Waldorf Streichfett

Post by Bitexion » Mon Mar 10, 2014 7:35 am

I really don't know what the purpose of a "stringer" is in today's market. I mean, it's just a sawtooth generator with a chorus/flanger effect. Any synth can do that.

It doesn't even have a filter.

User avatar
CS_TBL
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
Posts: 1677
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 3:47 pm
Gear: All "In-The-Box"
Mainly FM8
Location: NL
Contact:

Re: Waldorf Streichfett

Post by CS_TBL » Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:17 am

Just like I don't understand why there must be 10000 different guitars out there, all with the same strings, pickups, shape, controls etc.. The answer? "It sells"!
"You know I love you, CS, but this is bullshit." (Automatic Gainsay)
s: VSL/FM8/EWQL/LASS h: DX7/FS1r/VL70/SY77/SN2r/JD800/JD990/XV88/Emu6400/Poly61/Amek35:12:2/genelec1030 r: Violin/AltoSax/TinWhistle c: i7-4770/RAM32GB/SSD
FM8 vids

zoomtheline
No Longer Registered

Re: Waldorf Streichfett

Post by zoomtheline » Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:32 am

People like things that do exactly what they want from the get go.

If you buy milk, you can make cheese! So why do people buy cheese?

Post Reply