Synclavier FM engine the other FM engines

Discussions about anything analog, digital, MIDI, synth technology, techniques, theories and more.
Post Reply
User avatar
vcs3
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
Posts: 342
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:22 am
Gear: BitOne,DX7II, M-1000, ESQm, Procussion, NanoSynth, VL1, P2500, K5000R, FS1r, JX-3P, Ju-60,HR-16, CZ1000, RX-5,K2600S, Nord G1r, G2, XL-7, Shuthri-1
Location: Lusitania

Synclavier FM engine the other FM engines

Post by vcs3 » Sun Oct 26, 2014 8:24 pm

This question is about the power of the vintage Synclavier II 12 op FM synthesis
vs the synths with FM like the DX7, the powerfull FS1r and the FM softsynth.

Is it worth to have a Synclavier for FM?

User avatar
VCO8
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 48
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2014 7:59 am
Location: US

Re: Synclavier FM engine the other FM engines

Post by VCO8 » Thu Jan 08, 2015 6:44 am

I'd say so, if you were willing to spend $10,000. They were made at a time when digital synths had lots of character. I think each voice on it had it's own d/a converter. Also, the '80-'83 models had an 8-bit system making it even more gritty than a DX7. Later models had a 16-bit system which threw away some the character (but they had more features, like Sample-to-disc, etc.) You can designate each generation by the keyboard. (earlier ones had a wooden-colored one and the later ones were piano-black).

They were also capable of additive and re-synthesis (later models did, anyway)

If you have $10,000 and room for a mini-fridge-sized computer system, I'd get one. It's got more character than a FS1R and you can program it unlike a DX7.

User avatar
Walter Ego
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 897
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2012 7:17 pm
Gear: Various noisemakers hidden around my home and classroom. And a great quantity of caffeine.
Band: 12"VS
Location: Near Boston

Re: Synclavier FM engine the other FM engines

Post by Walter Ego » Thu Jan 08, 2015 7:46 pm

Others more capable than I can attest in better detail that the DKI Synergy is capable of FM as well. I suspect that more actual programming is necessary though. Hideaway Studio or Silikon both have experience with these, I believe. It's not an answer about the Synclavier, but in response to the last post.
Walter Ego
seamonkey wrote:I nominate this for STUPIDEST THREAD ever in the history of the internez. ;)

User avatar
calyx93
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 448
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 5:48 am
Gear: PPG Wave 2.2, Waldorf μWave x3, Roland JP6+V-Synth, SCI P5+600, Ensoniq SQ-80, Kawai K-3
Location: Winston-Salem, NC

Re: Synclavier FM engine the other FM engines

Post by calyx93 » Wed Jan 14, 2015 2:45 pm

Scroll down to see our member CZ Rider explain the particular style of FM implemented.

http://www.vintagesynth.com/forum/viewt ... p?p=529142
“I have stretched ropes from steeple to steeple; garlands from window to window; golden chains from star to star, and I dance.” - Rimbaud

User avatar
CS_TBL
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
Posts: 1677
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 3:47 pm
Gear: All "In-The-Box"
Mainly FM8
Location: NL
Contact:

Re: Synclavier FM engine the other FM engines

Post by CS_TBL » Wed Jan 14, 2015 6:49 pm

The chance that you'll be using 12 operators for one sound (one 'thing', like one xylophone) is pretty slim. And then using two 6-op synths (or two instances of a 6-op softsynth) is just more practical. To me it wouldn't be worth spending several grands on to have 12 operators that you'll be using as a 2..3 carrier FM-structure. FM8 has an input-operator, so you could still feed it an FM-structure (summed carriers) from another instance. Still kinda like having 12 ops but without having a 12x12 matrix with 100% flexible routing possibilities.
"You know I love you, CS, but this is bullshit." (Automatic Gainsay)
s: VSL/FM8/EWQL/LASS h: DX7/FS1r/VL70/SY77/SN2r/JD800/JD990/XV88/Emu6400/Poly61/Amek35:12:2/genelec1030 r: Violin/AltoSax/TinWhistle c: i7-4770/RAM32GB/SSD
FM8 vids

Post Reply