Moog model D reissue

Discussions about anything analog, digital, MIDI, synth technology, techniques, theories and more.
User avatar
Stab Frenzy
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 9723
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 5:41 pm
Gear: Eurorack, RYTM, Ultranova, many FX
Location: monster island*
Contact:

Re: Moog model D reissue

Post by Stab Frenzy » Mon May 30, 2016 6:53 am

colmon wrote:Spent 7 minutes with this synth yesterday, very disappointing experience. Sounds thin and plastic, like soft synth. Probably because it is PCB with modern made in China components and not handwired point to point circuitry. It lacked presence and felt 2D, not 3D like real woman with the massive buzungas.
Spoken like someone who has no idea at all about synths, electronics, or women.

User avatar
madtheory
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
Posts: 5136
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 12:45 pm
Real name: Tomas Mulcahy
Gear: Flangebeast Mk1, Plonkotron, Morovdis Arpeggiator, Maplin My First EQ, Cabaret Voltaire, Jeff Wayne Thunderchild rack, thermostat, Buck Owens Moog.
Band: Minim
Location: Cork, Ireland
Contact:

Re: Moog model D reissue

Post by madtheory » Mon May 30, 2016 10:51 am

Hybrid88 wrote:... you're welcome to believe whatever you choose ;)
If we're really talking in engineering, then absolutely, belief is not a factor. Tell me what's different about the audio signal path in the Voyager? And the CV system? I'm interested in what you think are the actual technical differences. Let's talk facts, not opinion.

monolith
Expert Member
Expert Member
Posts: 1172
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:37 am

Re: Moog model D reissue

Post by monolith » Tue May 31, 2016 7:49 am

Stab Frenzy wrote:
colmon wrote:Spent 7 minutes with this synth yesterday, very disappointing experience. Sounds thin and plastic, like soft synth. Probably because it is PCB with modern made in China components and not handwired point to point circuitry. It lacked presence and felt 2D, not 3D like real woman with the massive buzungas.
Spoken like someone who has no idea at all about synths, electronics, or women.

This little exchange is arguably the greatest thing I've ever read on this site. Can someone make this the banner up top? ^^^^^


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

User avatar
Hybrid88
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
Posts: 2251
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 8:26 am
Gear: V-Synth, and other stuff...
Location: Australia

Re: Moog model D reissue

Post by Hybrid88 » Tue May 31, 2016 10:54 am

^^ I think Stab just fed a troll ;)

User avatar
Hybrid88
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
Posts: 2251
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 8:26 am
Gear: V-Synth, and other stuff...
Location: Australia

Re: Moog model D reissue

Post by Hybrid88 » Tue May 31, 2016 10:56 am

madtheory wrote:
Hybrid88 wrote:... you're welcome to believe whatever you choose ;)
If we're really talking in engineering, then absolutely, belief is not a factor. Tell me what's different about the audio signal path in the Voyager? And the CV system? I'm interested in what you think are the actual technical differences. Let's talk facts, not opinion.
I'm not sure I need to reiterate the point, I was talking about *my impression* as an end user, not as a synth designer, so no I can't tell you the specific technical facts as to why I didn't like the sound of the synth. I only mentioned the amount of components as a general by-thought or an idea. I'm certainly not qualified to go into it in detail, but I merely mention it as a consideration.

I'm really not interested in going on about this, but the engineering design work Bob did in his early days is apples and oranges to where the Voyager is at, and sometimes you know what? There more advanced the design becomes, the more it lacks character, and as we're talking music here (something abstract and personal) then I think looking to *prove* things technically is a complete waste of time.

The Voyager is an extremely capable synth no doubt but what I can tell you with 100% certainty is that I didn't come away from the synth feeling like it was worth the money, not something I felt after trying a Model D.

Moving on, what I would love to know is how this new one stacks up, can't wait to give it a go! :)

stephenjbennett
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:51 pm

Re: Moog model D reissue

Post by stephenjbennett » Tue May 31, 2016 2:24 pm

Hybrid88 wrote:The Voyager just seems messy and overcomplicated for what it's trying to achieve to me,)
My Voyager OS is pretty simple—in fact, the only things it has in addition to the new Model D is a slightly more flexible modulation routing, FM and sync and the hi-pass filter. Stuff people would like on the new D, I suspect. It lacks MIDI though, so less 'complex' in that respect.

I assume when you're talking about complexity in a Voyager you're talking about things like the useful presets and the X/Y pad? As most people think that the sound of the OS is identical to the Voyager, these 'complexities'' don't appear to affect the sound quality of the Voyager/OS at all—which is phenomenal IMHO.

I have no problem reproducing the Model D sounds I used to use with the OS (apart from the 'headphone trick'). Others may think differently, of course.

Stephen
Last edited by stephenjbennett on Wed Jun 01, 2016 8:34 am, edited 1 time in total.

chipaudette
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 3:00 am

Re: Moog model D reissue

Post by chipaudette » Tue May 31, 2016 5:43 pm

stephenjbennett wrote:
Hybrid88 wrote:The Voyager just seems messy and overcomplicated for what it's trying to achieve to me,)
My Voyager OS is pretty simple—in fact, the only things it has in addition to the new Model D is a slightly more flexible modulation routing, FM and sync and the hi-pass filter. Stuff people would like on the new D, I suspect. It lacks MIDI though, so less 'complex' in that respect.

I assume when you're talking about complexity in a Voyager you're talking about things like the useful presets and the X/Y pad? As most people think that the sound of the OS is identical to the Voyager, these 'complexities'' don't appear to affect the sound quality of the Voyager/OS at all—which is phenomenal IMHO.

I have no problem reproducing the Model D sounds I used to use with the OS. Others may think differently, of course.

Stephen
I assumed that he meant that the *circuitry* was overly messy and complicated for what it was trying to achieve. I've never opened one up to see the circuitry, so I can't comment directly myself.

Chip

knolan
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
Posts: 480
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 1:42 am
Location: Dublin, Ireland

Re: Moog model D reissue

Post by knolan » Wed Jun 01, 2016 1:27 am

madtheory wrote:
Hybrid88 wrote:... you're welcome to believe whatever you choose ;)
If we're really talking in engineering, then absolutely, belief is not a factor. Tell me what's different about the audio signal path in the Voyager? And the CV system? I'm interested in what you think are the actual technical differences. Let's talk facts, not opinion.

I honestly can't believe you have this stance. Just because of the generational gap, the physical differences, manufacturing techniques of components and so forth - the Voyager is going to be different. That's a fact! It's not a bad thing.

But from a more musical stand point, the Mininoog is an instantly recognisable sound; and one of truly exceptional 'character'. It is instantly recognisable to most. The Voyager is arguably slightly more 'vanilla'. I've watched a myriad of youtube demos over the years - and every single one of them point to significant differences - and significantly - they ALL point out the same differences. There is an overwhelming body of evidence that they sound different.

My opinion is that the Minimoog Model D sounds better - but that is a prejudiced stand point because I'm identifying it with a bunch of classic tracks that used it. I accept fully that someone half my age, and more importantly anyone who has heard a Voyager first, may thing it's the better one. That probably is a bit subjective (though I do believe that the Model D had extraordinary strength of character in its own right and is loved for good / sound reasons).

But - they are significantly different. I have no idea why anyone would deny that!

User avatar
ApolloBoy
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 142
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 5:25 pm
Gear: Korg ARP Odyssey
Korg Minilogue
Korg Monotron
Korg Volca Beats
Roland Jupiter-4
Roland JX-10
Squier P-Bass
Yamaha CS01
Yamaha CS-10
Location: Campbell, CA

Re: Moog model D reissue

Post by ApolloBoy » Wed Jun 01, 2016 2:19 am

Hybrid88 wrote:^^ I think Stab just fed a troll ;)
A really lame troll at that.
Had: DX7, AX-60, SR-16, Yamaha TQ5, 01/WFD, Juno-106, MG-1, JX-03
Want: OB-6, Prophet 6, Jupiter-6

blueknob
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 259
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:30 pm
Gear: ESi32/E6400U, Novation Supernova, Ensoniq (a shedful), vintage Macs, Hamm C3/122
Location: England, UK

Re: Moog model D reissue

Post by blueknob » Wed Jun 01, 2016 7:08 am

Just as an alternative viewpoint... I have seen people replicate (make identical copies) of the circuits as used in the MiniMoog, I think the modern term is "cloned". What's the opinion on these? I've had a Model D in my house to play with, it does have a unique edge to the it. I would think anything clocked (digital) just can't match that so an analogue circuit would be the way forward (except use digital for the keyscan) hence why I wonder if these "clones" are the next best thing.

User avatar
madtheory
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
Posts: 5136
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 12:45 pm
Real name: Tomas Mulcahy
Gear: Flangebeast Mk1, Plonkotron, Morovdis Arpeggiator, Maplin My First EQ, Cabaret Voltaire, Jeff Wayne Thunderchild rack, thermostat, Buck Owens Moog.
Band: Minim
Location: Cork, Ireland
Contact:

Re: Moog model D reissue

Post by madtheory » Wed Jun 01, 2016 6:25 pm

knolan wrote:But - they are significantly different. I have no idea why anyone would deny that!
There's a lot of emotion in these opinions, and that's important. The musician's impression of the instrument, even though it is probably cognitive bias, is still very real and it's what makes the instrument speak. My own emotional impression of the Voyager was that it reeks class, is very easy to dial in the sound you want, and had bags of personality. Just like the Minimoog. It's Bob Moog's personality. I have the same experience with Dave Smith's instruments. As Bob Moog said in reference to the clean and clever design of the RCA Theremin "Those guys had smarts".

The only way we could truly resolve this argument is to design a specific double blind AB test. Could be fun- one of us behind a curtain with a bunch of typical patches programmed in the Voyager and replicate them as we go along on the Minimoog. The rest of us out front trying to tell the difference. That party will never happen, but it sounds like fun!

But stating they're "significantly different", or that there is some kind of "clocking" involved in the audio path, or that the circuit is too "complicated" or that a Minimoog is "discrete" (tip: it isn't)... sorry, that is just making an assumption about electronics. Unless you know your way blindfolded around a common emitter amplifier or a 741 (which the Mini has) 555 timer or a passive crossover or a DAC ladder or whatever, forget about it. Don't even go there. Make your impression as a user/ musician, but don't make assumptions about electronics based on that.

And I'm sure Moog are well aware of this bias, which is why they discontinued the Voyager and are replacing it with an instrument that's much easier to build, and is unarguably identical to the original. That is a f**k ing clever move.

commodorejohn
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
Posts: 1562
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2013 2:39 am
Real name: John
Gear: Roland JX-10/SH-09/MT-32/D-50, Yamaha DX7-II/V50/TX7/TG33/FB-01, Korg MS-20 Mini/ARP Odyssey/DW-8000/X5DR, Ensoniq SQ-80, Oberheim SEM
Location: Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Re: Moog model D reissue

Post by commodorejohn » Wed Jun 01, 2016 6:33 pm

madtheory wrote:and is unarguably identical to the original.
Nothing is unarguable in the world of gearheads, no matter what the facts have to say in the matter ;)
Computers: Amiga 1200, DEC VAXStation 4000/60, DEC MicroPDP-11/73

knolan
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
Posts: 480
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 1:42 am
Location: Dublin, Ireland

Re: Moog model D reissue

Post by knolan » Wed Jun 01, 2016 7:39 pm

madtheory wrote:
knolan wrote:But - they are significantly different. I have no idea why anyone would deny that!
There's a lot of emotion in these opinions, and that's important. The musician's impression of the instrument, even though it is probably cognitive bias, is still very real and it's what makes the instrument speak. My own emotional impression of the Voyager was that it reeks class, is very easy to dial in the sound you want, and had bags of personality. Just like the Minimoog. It's Bob Moog's personality. I have the same experience with Dave Smith's instruments. As Bob Moog said in reference to the clean and clever design of the RCA Theremin "Those guys had smarts".

The only way we could truly resolve this argument is to design a specific double blind AB test. Could be fun- one of us behind a curtain with a bunch of typical patches programmed in the Voyager and replicate them as we go along on the Minimoog. The rest of us out front trying to tell the difference. That party will never happen, but it sounds like fun!

But stating they're "significantly different", or that there is some kind of "clocking" involved in the audio path, or that the circuit is too "complicated" or that a Minimoog is "discrete" (tip: it isn't)... sorry, that is just making an assumption about electronics. Unless you know your way blindfolded around a common emitter amplifier or a 741 (which the Mini has) 555 timer or a passive crossover or a DAC ladder or whatever, forget about it. Don't even go there. Make your impression as a user/ musician, but don't make assumptions about electronics based on that.

And I'm sure Moog are well aware of this bias, which is why they discontinued the Voyager and are replacing it with an instrument that's much easier to build, and is unarguably identical to the original. That is a f**k ing clever move.

Clearly you've been engaged in this 'debate' for a lot longer than I have - I'm just a blow in - so you may feel emotional about it.

It's pretty simple to me. The Model D is made from components manufactured in the 70's and 80's; the Voyager is made from components from he noughties and presently.

The one thing that has changed beyond all recognition in that time is manufacturing techniques - even of the same components.

So the differences between the two are real and identifiable. Indeed I've read that Moog have had to have parts remanufactured for the new model D that don't otherwise exist. Plus - the Voyager is likely designed different; and circuit boards are likely laid out differently - and - the keyboard is different. You might think all of those add up to nothing, but that's a different discussion.


Whether you deem the differences to be better is subjective - but the differences are real, and there!

User avatar
madtheory
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
Posts: 5136
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 12:45 pm
Real name: Tomas Mulcahy
Gear: Flangebeast Mk1, Plonkotron, Morovdis Arpeggiator, Maplin My First EQ, Cabaret Voltaire, Jeff Wayne Thunderchild rack, thermostat, Buck Owens Moog.
Band: Minim
Location: Cork, Ireland
Contact:

Re: Moog model D reissue

Post by madtheory » Wed Jun 01, 2016 9:10 pm

Can you post links to articles about these components? What exactly has changed about the manufacturing? Have the specs of the op amps and transistors been changed? Specifics please!

chipaudette
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 3:00 am

Re: Moog model D reissue

Post by chipaudette » Wed Jun 01, 2016 9:50 pm

madtheory wrote:Can you post links to articles about these components? What exactly has changed about the manufacturing? Have the specs of the op amps and transistors been changed? Specifics please!
Voyager: Model D: Where are the good Model D photos!?!?

Chip

Post Reply