Moog model D reissue

Discussions about anything analog, digital, MIDI, synth technology, techniques, theories and more.
Post Reply
User avatar
cornutt
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2117
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:03 am
Gear: 6th
Location: Rocket City USA
Contact:

Re: Moog model D reissue

Post by cornutt » Wed Jun 01, 2016 10:12 pm

So one thing that's frustrating to me whenever these discussions come up, is that there isn't any single "Model D design". For instance, if I recall, there were three major revisions of the VCO boards that used very different expo converter circuits. Yet, in discussions like this, they are all treated the same.

I'll be honest and say that some of it comes across to me as sheer nostalgia, or fetishizing. Now, experience is subjective, so if playing one does it for you, that's great and I won't argue. But don't try to convince me that it's objectively better solely on that basis.
Switches, knobs, buttons, LEDs, LCD screens, monitors, keys, mice, jacks, sockets. Now two joysticks!

knolan
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
Posts: 484
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 1:42 am
Location: Dublin, Ireland

Re: Moog model D reissue

Post by knolan » Wed Jun 01, 2016 10:19 pm

madtheory wrote:Can you post links to articles about these components? What exactly has changed about the manufacturing? Have the specs of the op amps and transistors been changed? Specifics please!
Here are some specifics you can try out for yourself:

1. Get a 30 cm perspex ruler

2. Measure the physical dimensions of each synthesizer. (you'll find: they are different)

3. Open up each synthesizer and look, using eyes, the physical lay out of each synthesizer's circuit boards (again, you'll find - they're not the same. Some differences: the length and breath dimensions of each board will be: "different"; the number of wires and busses will be "different"; the path distances between synthesizer sub-sections (and their associated timings, capacitances, impact on phase relationships and so forth) will be: "different"

4. Check the underlying key assembly, again with eyes. You'll see it's: different

5. Check quality of solder and soldering techniques: they will be: different

6. Check the supplier of: resistors, capacitors, diodes, transistors, op-amps, timers - you will find many, if not all are: different


For analogue electronics, every detail affects the behaviour of the circuit. Given the number of differences in the above, it is highly likely they are, as synthesizers, different

If you can't see that - get your eyes checked.


Before anyone jumps down my throat - I know Tomas - we're Irish - satire / sarcasm is in the blood - I'm expecting a pounding back from Tomas :-)

User avatar
madtheory
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
Posts: 5154
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 12:45 pm
Real name: Tomas Mulcahy
Gear: Flangebeast Mk1, Plonkotron, Morovdis Arpeggiator, Maplin My First EQ, Jeff Wayne Thunderchild rack, Thermostat, Buck Owens' Moog.
Band: Minim
Location: Cork, Ireland
Contact:

Re: Moog model D reissue

Post by madtheory » Wed Jun 01, 2016 10:52 pm

Thanks Chip, but just now I was referring to what he said about the Model D components and manufacture, not about the Voyager:
knolan wrote:
The one thing that has changed beyond all recognition in that time is manufacturing techniques - even of the same components.

So the differences between the two are real and identifiable. Indeed I've read that Moog have had to have parts remanufactured for the new model D that don't otherwise exist.
A change of supplier doesn't change the spec of a resistor, or any other component. That's just a bizarre thing to say. This stuff is manufactured to a specification. Otherwise, things go wrong. How does the type of keyboard in a Minimoog change the quality of sound? How does path distance change the timing of a voltage in a through hole PCB? Seriously, you're an astrophysicist! You should know that stuff, it's LC electronics. And again, what has changed since the seventies in the manufacturing of, say, a 741 op amp?
cornutt wrote:I'll be honest and say that some of it comes across to me as sheer nostalgia, or fetishizing. Now, experience is subjective, so if playing one does it for you, that's great and I won't argue. But don't try to convince me that it's objectively better solely on that basis.
I'm glad someone else sees it that way! Thank you :)
knolan wrote:If you can't see that - get your eyes checked.
Evidence of visual bias, in a discussion about sound? Hmmmm!!! :lol:

chipaudette
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 3:00 am

Re: Moog model D reissue

Post by chipaudette » Wed Jun 01, 2016 11:25 pm

madtheory wrote:How does path distance change the timing of a voltage in a through hole PCB?
In guitar amps, the path distance (ie, the length of wire / PCB trace) in a circuit does have an effect on the sound. I've experienced it first hand in my own amp modifications. Pull out a bunch of wire and you get a different sound. In my amp's case, it was a better sound, but I'm not going to say that shorter is better in general.

A guitar amp and a synth are likely different beasts with regard to wire length. Tube guitar amps have several hundred volts getting modulated, whereas synths have maybe 10V. Also, guitar amps have lots of gain whereas synths (by comparison) usually don't. Therefore, a lot of the issue in guitar amps are EMI pickup and self-oscillation, which are both reduced through shorter wires.

But, my general point is that, through this experience, I became open to the idea that wire length / trace length could be important in analog systems. Perhaps it's important in the Model D, or perhaps not.

Chip

knolan
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
Posts: 484
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 1:42 am
Location: Dublin, Ireland

Re: Moog model D reissue

Post by knolan » Thu Jun 02, 2016 12:19 am

Indeed, path lengths and differences can affect a myriad of circuit characteristics - everything from timings, to differences in timings, to impedance, to stray capacitance. I'm not talking the wacky "gold speaker cable is better than copper cable here" - I'm talking about anything from nano-second delays to pico-farad capacitance or minute impedances that instigate relevant filtering, phasing, non-linear distortion effects that affect the behaviour of all manner of audio circuits.

And that's not even considering a plethora of techniques that can be (and are likely implemented in the Voyager but not the Model D) such as voltage regulation, temperature stabalizing techniques, power management - you name it - there are probably dozens of such features in Voyager that render it more reliable than the Model D; and all impact the sound.

Hence why Horowitz & Hill is called "The Art of Electronics" and not "The Science of Electronics".


Voyager is a stunning instrument no doubt about it; but it is a very different beast to the Model D.

chipaudette
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 3:00 am

Re: Moog model D reissue

Post by chipaudette » Thu Jun 02, 2016 1:20 am

knolan wrote: Hence why Horowitz & Hill is called "The Art of Electronics" and not "The Science of Electronics".
Ah, Horowitz & Hill. <sigh> I myself haven't laid eyes on the new version...the one that I've got dates back to the mid 90s...my first electronics class. Memory lane.

Back on the issue of the Voyager...in the photos I see that the Voyager uses LM13700 OTAs. A very sensible and classic decision. Was this IC used in any of the 1970's Model D variants? I have no issue with it either way...just wondering how quickly the Model D was revised to take advantage of then-new ICs...

User avatar
ninja6485
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
Posts: 2766
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:13 pm
Gear: Virus Ti, Jx-8p, Juno 60, Radias, Maschine, 101,303,606,707,727,808,909, odyssey, mirage, akai s5K/s2K/s1k, drumtraks, E6400ult, M1R, rx5, fizmo,d50
Band: Lyra, The Sun Worshipers
Location: Exton/ westchester

Re: Moog model D reissue

Post by ninja6485 » Thu Jun 02, 2016 2:20 am

knolan wrote:And that's not even considering a plethora of techniques that can be (and are likely implemented in the Voyager but not the Model D) such as voltage regulation, temperature stabalizing techniques, power management - you name it - there are probably dozens of such features in Voyager that render it more reliable than the Model D; and all impact the sound.
So my question is, are any of these things going to be used on the reissue? And if so, how will this affect the sound? Will it be closer to a voyager if they are in place (provided they do in fact affect the sound, and are a notable difference between the two)?

Always liked the voyager. I want a white one with electric green/ yellow lights! 8-) Minomoog reissue is very tempting however...
This looks like a psychotropic reaction. No wonder it's so popular...

blueknob
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 262
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:30 pm
Gear: ESi32/E6400U, Novation Supernova, Ensoniq (a shedful), vintage Macs, Hamm C3/122
Location: England, UK

Re: Moog model D reissue

Post by blueknob » Thu Jun 02, 2016 7:36 am

This thread reads really stupid, like a bunch of schoolboys arguing over who has got the best widget "mine is better than yours" - "I know more than you" -"I know what a 741 and a 555 is so beat that".

User avatar
madtheory
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
Posts: 5154
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 12:45 pm
Real name: Tomas Mulcahy
Gear: Flangebeast Mk1, Plonkotron, Morovdis Arpeggiator, Maplin My First EQ, Jeff Wayne Thunderchild rack, Thermostat, Buck Owens' Moog.
Band: Minim
Location: Cork, Ireland
Contact:

Re: Moog model D reissue

Post by madtheory » Thu Jun 02, 2016 8:08 am

Kevin, it's old and new Minmoog manufacture that I'm pulling you up on now. You still haven't answered the component question. All of your "evidence" so far is anecdotal, by the way.

User avatar
Hybrid88
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
Posts: 2251
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 8:26 am
Gear: V-Synth, and other stuff...
Location: Australia

Re: Moog model D reissue

Post by Hybrid88 » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:04 am

Oh God, what have I started... Madtheory, relax for a minute, I made a by-comment on electronics as an idea, if that was a wrong assumption that's fine but no need to go on about it. I do have some experience in electronics which is why I mentioned it as a theory so don't feel the need to go out of your way to make an issue of my personal knowledge. I don't doubt there are bigger geeks than me out there on the topic :lol:

They are different, simple, you can't deny that. The point is whether it makes a difference to you, and *that* is what we are really talking about here (whatever you may admit). Ultimately it's something that will be different from person to person. I'd be happy to just agree on that and move on from this discussion. I prefer the Model D, you like the Voyager, great, that's why they both exist! ;)

User avatar
madtheory
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
Posts: 5154
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 12:45 pm
Real name: Tomas Mulcahy
Gear: Flangebeast Mk1, Plonkotron, Morovdis Arpeggiator, Maplin My First EQ, Jeff Wayne Thunderchild rack, Thermostat, Buck Owens' Moog.
Band: Minim
Location: Cork, Ireland
Contact:

Re: Moog model D reissue

Post by madtheory » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:15 am

It wasn't just you- I quoted 4 different assumptions from 4 different people. At least cornutt gets the bias thing. So when you guys are disposing of the Voyager you replaced with a Minimoog I will happily take it off your hands :)

User avatar
Bitexion
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
Posts: 4230
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2005 7:43 pm
Gear: Alesis Andromeda A6
Roland D-50
Creamware Minimax
Yamaha DX7s
Analogue Systems modular
Ensoniq SQ-80
Waldorf Blofeld
Location: Drammen, Norway

Re: Moog model D reissue

Post by Bitexion » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:39 am

Can you guys, even if you know eachother, please not use "real names", refer to the forum names when you post here?
Makes it alot easier for the rest of us to follow when it's not adressed to Kevin or Tomas.

User avatar
Hybrid88
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
Posts: 2251
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 8:26 am
Gear: V-Synth, and other stuff...
Location: Australia

Re: Moog model D reissue

Post by Hybrid88 » Thu Jun 02, 2016 3:36 pm

madtheory wrote:It wasn't just you- I quoted 4 different assumptions from 4 different people. At least cornutt gets the bias thing. So when you guys are disposing of the Voyager you replaced with a Minimoog I will happily take it off your hands :)
That's great you love the Voyager, I love my Model D. Horses for courses :)

User avatar
Sir Ruff
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
Posts: 3519
Joined: Tue May 09, 2006 11:55 pm
Gear: Two persimmon modulators and a frequency adjudicator.
Band: Ruff in the jungle
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Moog model D reissue

Post by Sir Ruff » Thu Jun 02, 2016 5:25 pm

ninja6485 wrote:
knolan wrote:And that's not even considering a plethora of techniques that can be (and are likely implemented in the Voyager but not the Model D) such as voltage regulation, temperature stabalizing techniques, power management - you name it - there are probably dozens of such features in Voyager that render it more reliable than the Model D; and all impact the sound.
So my question is, are any of these things going to be used on the reissue? And if so, how will this affect the sound? Will it be closer to a voyager if they are in place (provided they do in fact affect the sound, and are a notable difference between the two)?

Always liked the voyager. I want a white one with electric green/ yellow lights! 8-) Minomoog reissue is very tempting however...
I think the answer is a very firm "no". They are doing this 1:1 to the original--getting original transistors remade to spec, copying all aspect of circuit boards, leaving unused component slots on the board (for the older keyboard) still intact. I think this is going to be the clone to beat all "clones". From what i can tell, you are buying an original minimoog, no concessions made. The added midi and LFO are purely icing on the cake.
Do you even post on vse bro?

sam
Expert Member
Expert Member
Posts: 1303
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: Europe

Re: Moog model D reissue

Post by sam » Thu Jun 02, 2016 6:02 pm

i would think is sounds tight and new...i wasnt around to hear a brand new mini in a shop but from what i hear with my own new analogs is more precision ect..which isnt a bad thing.
however i repair vintage synths and i fix many minimoogs which all sound a little different but in the end what ever mini you get sounds great.
all of the synths after 30 years will have varying ageing components and this is usually the difference people refere to in these discussions.
i hope it sounds great like its older brothers.....and not like the voyager which i have played but left me a bit dissapointed....didnt have the magic or power of a real mini.
and i wanted to like it......
Lam memorymoog.Sonic six.Vp330 mk1.SH101.OSCar.ARP odyssey..multivox mx3000.Solina stringsynth.polivox
ms20/50.Andromeda. OBX.
Prophet 5 Pro-one. Wasp.EMS AKS.

Post Reply