MC-202 or Novation Bass Station

A forum for comparing two or more synths against each other. Also known as "versus" threads.
Post Reply
DGBX
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:58 pm

MC-202 or Novation Bass Station

Post by DGBX » Sun Dec 06, 2009 5:18 am

Just in terms of sound, not taking into account the onboard sequencer of the 202. I've heard that the 202 can be "plasticky". is this the case?

schmidtc
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 591
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 8:27 pm
Location: Virginia / Paris

Re: MC-202 or Novation Bass Station

Post by schmidtc » Sun Dec 06, 2009 5:47 pm

This is a 202 sounding similar to a 303:



I'd take one over a bass station any day, but both are cool.

User avatar
jeeroj
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 451
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 11:22 pm
Gear: sh-101, x0xb0x(x2), tr-606, korg es-1, half dead mc-303 and some boss micro racks

Re: MC-202 or Novation Bass Station

Post by jeeroj » Sun Dec 06, 2009 5:52 pm

schmidtc wrote:This is a 202 sounding similar to a 303:



I'd take one over a bass station any day, but both are cool.

is that definitley a 202 in that tune?
Debut Album out now jeeroj - Selected Acid Works 08-11
check the review HERE first

schmidtc
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 591
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 8:27 pm
Location: Virginia / Paris

Re: MC-202 or Novation Bass Station

Post by schmidtc » Sun Dec 06, 2009 8:19 pm

Yep. I remember reading an old interview with jeff mills or mad mike or someone and being really surprised when they said it was not in fact a 303, but a 202. Like most everyone else that loved that track, I had guessed wrong.

magnus
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 41
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:51 pm

Re: MC-202 or Novation Bass Station

Post by magnus » Sun Dec 13, 2009 11:54 pm

Yeah the MC-202 does sound pretty plasticky, although it can sound alright with a bit of resonance. Don't expect the 202 to be a TB-303 emulator - whilst you may be able to get a broadly similar sound, there are things that a 303 will do that a 202 won't. For example, IIRC, the accent envelope behaves differently. I think Robin Whittle has made some relevant posts on the Analogue Heaven archive.

With all that said, maybe it's best to enjoy the 202 for what it is, but if you only care about the sound (not the sequencer) there are maybe better options.

PS The suboscillator on the the 202 REALLY sucks balls. I can't figure out why Roland deliberately made it so weak. Anyone else notice this, or am I just unlucky?

User avatar
Computer Controlled
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 624
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 10:12 am
Gear: SH-101 . TB-3 . TR-8 . Juno-1 w/PG-300 . TT-303 . Korg ES2 . Beatstep Pro . Pioneer RMX-500
Band: Computer Controlled
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Re: MC-202 or Novation Bass Station

Post by Computer Controlled » Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:29 am

Oh FFS, that is NOT a 202 in Seawolf. I see this all the time. Just like the "it's a 202 not a 303" in that Josh Wink track. It's a 303. The sawtooth sound gives it away. So do the accents. I would like to see this interview.

At any rate, the Bass Station can sound very similar to my 101, so i'm sure it can sound similar to the 202. Since the 101 and 202 are based off of the same engine. The B.S. is a great synth!
Synths:
Avalon Bassline . TB-03 . JU-06 . MX-1 . Blofeld . MicroMonsta . Akai S5000
Drum Machines:
TR-09 . TR-8

User avatar
analoglsd
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
Posts: 580
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 7:53 am
Real name: Lance
Gear: Buchla Music Easel, TE OP-1, Korg MS-20, Yamaha RS-7000, Effects Pedals
Location: Oakland, CA
Contact:

Re: MC-202 or Novation Bass Station

Post by analoglsd » Mon Dec 14, 2009 6:21 am

I really like the MC-202 sound and the Bass Station sound.
I've been setting up a small portable live rig and was deciding between the Bass Station keyboard and the MC-202, and I went with the 202, I own them both.
The one aspect that really sets the two apart as far as active performance, is the fact that you can hear the digital "steps" when you are turning the knobs.
In this respect, I find the MC-202 more musical and organic.
I don't use the sequencer with the 202, and find it unintuitive.

User avatar
Computer Controlled
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 624
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 10:12 am
Gear: SH-101 . TB-3 . TR-8 . Juno-1 w/PG-300 . TT-303 . Korg ES2 . Beatstep Pro . Pioneer RMX-500
Band: Computer Controlled
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Re: MC-202 or Novation Bass Station

Post by Computer Controlled » Mon Dec 14, 2009 9:16 am

I've never once heard the Bass Station step. I've had two keyboards and two racks. h**l, even the A-Station i had didn't step. Except for the Filter Env knob.
Synths:
Avalon Bassline . TB-03 . JU-06 . MX-1 . Blofeld . MicroMonsta . Akai S5000
Drum Machines:
TR-09 . TR-8

edfunction
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 294
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 6:47 pm
Gear: sh-101, monomachine, nordmodular, esx1, nova, jx3p, jx8p, prophet vs, dx200
Location: Basel

Re: MC-202 or Novation Bass Station

Post by edfunction » Wed Dec 16, 2009 7:38 pm

I just had a visit from a Bass-station so now I can comment :)

It sounds really quite nice, not so different from a 101, but that 2nd oscillator lets you do a few other things.
the resonance seems pretty heavy handed, but that could be a positive depending on what you want.

I really like the 202 sequencer though. If it had memory it would be perfect! If you don't need/like the sequencer I'd go for the bass station.

User avatar
Solderman
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
Posts: 1799
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 5:43 pm

Re: MC-202 or Novation Bass Station

Post by Solderman » Thu Dec 17, 2009 8:59 pm

I've had a Bass Station rack, and currently have a SH-101, essentially the same sound engine as the 202, excluding modulation and accent. Besides the second hard-syncable oscillator, the BSR also has two filter types. The 2 pole doesn't self oscillate and has a rather weak, nasal(plastic?) resonance, whereas the 4 pole is quite Moog-sounding, and has a subtle amount of pre-filter distortion at high resonance. The BSR's oscillators are DCO, and imo not very bright sounding. I used both of them for different purposes, and preferred the BSR for bass until I got a Pro~One, which I later replaced with a Moog Voyager. I guess it's true that the 101/202 thins out alot with increased resonance, but I feel it makes up for it with more squelch. When I modded my 101, I added the oscillator chip's triangle wave to the 101 mixer, and this helped fill out resonant sounds quite a bit.
Ultimately I thought the BSR was rather weak-sounding when not playing bass notes, and the envelopes weren't very dynamic like the 101's. The only real gimmick I liked with the BSR was tuning the self-oscillation close to one oscillator, to get this whacky squared sound.
Here is the demo I did of my BSR patches before I sold it:
I am no longer in pursuit of vintage synths. The generally absurd inflation from demand versus practical use and maintenance costs is no longer viable. The internet has suffocated and vanquished yet another wonderful hobby. Too bad.
--Solderman no more.

Post Reply