Roland JX showdown: JX-3P vs JX-8P vs Super JX10

A forum for comparing two or more synths against each other. Also known as "versus" threads.
User avatar
CfNorENa
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 358
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:41 pm
Gear: SEM | SH-2 | Prophet 5 | MKS-70 | Microwave XTk | Kronos || AD 202 | El Capistan | DP/4 | Eclipse | Rumour | PCM90
Location: SF Bay Area

Re: Roland JX showdown: JX-3P vs JX-8P vs Super JX10

Post by CfNorENa » Sat Nov 11, 2017 9:17 pm

madtheory wrote:They all use the same 3109 filter chip.
Don't think that's right. I thought only the JX-3P used the IR-3109 -- same as Jupiter 8 and Juno 60 -- while the JX-8P and JX-10 (and MKS-80 rev. 5) used the IR-3R05.

commodorejohn
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
Posts: 1564
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2013 2:39 am
Real name: John
Gear: Roland JX-10/SH-09/MT-32/D-50, Yamaha DX7-II/V50/TX7/TG33/FB-01, Korg MS-20 Mini/ARP Odyssey/DW-8000/X5DR, Ensoniq SQ-80, Oberheim SEM
Location: Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Re: Roland JX showdown: JX-3P vs JX-8P vs Super JX10

Post by commodorejohn » Sun Nov 12, 2017 6:25 am

CfNorENa wrote:
madtheory wrote:They all use the same 3109 filter chip.
Don't think that's right. I thought only the JX-3P used the IR-3109 -- same as Jupiter 8 and Juno 60 -- while the JX-8P and JX-10 (and MKS-80 rev. 5) used the IR-3R05.
If this page is correct, it is as you say.
Computers: Amiga 1200, DEC VAXStation 4000/60, DEC MicroPDP-11/73

User avatar
madtheory
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
Posts: 5174
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 12:45 pm
Real name: Tomas Mulcahy
Gear: Flangebeast Mk1, Plonkotron, Morovdis Arpeggiator, Maplin My First EQ, Jeff Wayne Thunderchild rack, Thermostat, Buck Owens' Moog.
Band: Minim
Location: Cork, Ireland
Contact:

Re: Roland JX showdown: JX-3P vs JX-8P vs Super JX10

Post by madtheory » Sun Nov 12, 2017 10:16 am

Ah, missed that fact. Is there a sonic difference between IR3109 and IR3R05 though? AFAIK they're just wired differently, apparently 3R05 allows ready access to the two filters?

From what I can see, no-one has done a careful side by side comparison where the synths in question have been calibrated as per service manual. That would settle it. Until then, we have subjective opinion. That's fine, keeps the price of the Juno 106 and the JX10 down :)

User avatar
wjmwpg
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 5:14 pm
Real name: James
Gear: LoveRock, T40, MG500, JX10 4.0, D-50, Juno 60, VZ10M, CZ1, HT6000, K3m, SX240, Lambda, DSS1, Yamaha SY2, DX11, SQ80, MultiTrak, SammichSID
Band: Gospel Choirs
Location: Canada

Re: Roland JX showdown: JX-3P vs JX-8P vs Super JX10

Post by wjmwpg » Sun Dec 03, 2017 7:05 pm

I realize that this is a bit of an old topic at this point, but I just thought I would mention for anyone visiting this thread now, that the Vecoven upgrades for the JX10 have really taking it to another level. With a straight EEPROM swap you get snappier envelopes, more envelopes (two of which are multipoint), more LFO‘s, wonderful sysex and CC midi control. Now all of this is cool, but if you want you can also install the PWM boards that give you pulse width modulation available for every oscilator’s pulse wave, (without having to do the sync trick that loses you one oscillator (not always the biggest deal on a 24 osc synthesizer). And what’s more, you can also install the new memory upgrade that gives you 1 billion internally stored patches… (OK I’m exaggerating, but you get the idea.) So yeah, if you’re interested in a JX10, you can pick one up for cheap, and turn it into a total beast with the Vecoven upgrades. And lastly, if you get a JX10 and perform the Vecoven upgrades, you can control it all with a BCR2000 and the 5 page patch I wrote for it available on GS and FB. ;)

Post Reply