Arturia: The New Generation

For computer based music makers. Discussions about plug-ins and stand alone computer synth gear.
User avatar
crystalmsc
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
Posts: 2861
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 7:15 am
Gear: uWaveXT,uQ,Pulse+;Ion;MiniBrt,Karma,Mntrb,Volcas,01R;Venom,NordModular,L2X;Evolver;JP8080,MKS70,JD990,D50,MC909,MC80ex,Microcon2;TG77,RS7k,AN200,AN1x
Band: Crystaline
Location: Synth Garden
Contact:

Re: Arturia: The New Generation

Post by crystalmsc » Sun Jul 29, 2012 8:02 pm

MitchK1989 wrote:I may finally pick up prophet V now. Does it still require a dongle?
I own the Modular V and it run with a soft eLicenser without a USB dongle.
Kaossilatron - Voicillator
http://crystaline.bandcamp.com
Station: Ableton Live 10 Suite, Obscurium, Push 2, Ultranova, MS-20m, Wavedrums

MitchK1989
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 663
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 1:46 am
Location: Nova Scotia

Re: Arturia: The New Generation

Post by MitchK1989 » Thu Aug 02, 2012 7:21 pm

Now I just have to decide between diva or a couple of these.

Kidney05
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 360
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 5:34 am
Gear: Juno 106, Tetra, Mopho Keyboard, Little Phatty Stage II, RX-5, Volcas, JX-3P, R5, 505, TX-7, D550, TX81Z, Korg MS-20 Mini, Minibrute, Six Traks, TR-8
Contact:

Re: Arturia: The New Generation

Post by Kidney05 » Fri Aug 03, 2012 2:31 am

My first of three upcoming Arturia Next Gen reviews:
http://thesynthesizersympathizer.blogsp ... eview.html

Ashe37
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3876
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 3:43 pm
Real name: Unpronounceable
Gear: Ensoniq SD-1/32,SQR,VFX,ESQm
Virus Indigo, M3-61 , MS2000BR, Volca Bass
Emu XL-7, Matrix 6r
TG-33, K3m, Blofeld, Micron, Mopho, BS II, JV-1080
Band: Eridani V
Location: Central VA

Re: Arturia: The New Generation

Post by Ashe37 » Fri Aug 03, 2012 4:22 am

Sorry, I don't feel you can accurately review CPU usage of most new softsynths on something two CPU generations old (three gens if you count core2Quads). Btw, don't try Tremor on that machine.

Kidney05
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 360
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 5:34 am
Gear: Juno 106, Tetra, Mopho Keyboard, Little Phatty Stage II, RX-5, Volcas, JX-3P, R5, 505, TX-7, D550, TX81Z, Korg MS-20 Mini, Minibrute, Six Traks, TR-8
Contact:

Re: Arturia: The New Generation

Post by Kidney05 » Fri Aug 03, 2012 5:29 am

Ashe37 wrote:Sorry, I don't feel you can accurately review CPU usage of most new softsynths on something two CPU generations old (three gens if you count core2Quads). Btw, don't try Tremor on that machine.
Yeah, but it says something for it if it runs well on my machine. It's a tough thing, but I'm hopefully updating in a few months.

Ashe37
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3876
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 3:43 pm
Real name: Unpronounceable
Gear: Ensoniq SD-1/32,SQR,VFX,ESQm
Virus Indigo, M3-61 , MS2000BR, Volca Bass
Emu XL-7, Matrix 6r
TG-33, K3m, Blofeld, Micron, Mopho, BS II, JV-1080
Band: Eridani V
Location: Central VA

Re: Arturia: The New Generation

Post by Ashe37 » Fri Aug 03, 2012 5:32 am

Kidney05 wrote:
Ashe37 wrote:Sorry, I don't feel you can accurately review CPU usage of most new softsynths on something two CPU generations old (three gens if you count core2Quads). Btw, don't try Tremor on that machine.
Yeah, but it says something for it if it runs well on my machine. It's a tough thing, but I'm hopefully updating in a few months.

Just as a comparison: a moderately-priced i5 quad-core will be four or five times faster than your current machine. An i7 would be faster than that.

User avatar
BlackGnosis
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
Posts: 524
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 12:18 pm
Real name: Stormy
Gear: See signature image.
Band: Eridani V
Location: San Angelo, TX
Contact:

Re: Arturia: The New Generation

Post by BlackGnosis » Fri Aug 03, 2012 5:35 am

Kidney05 wrote:
Ashe37 wrote:Sorry, I don't feel you can accurately review CPU usage of most new softsynths on something two CPU generations old (three gens if you count core2Quads). Btw, don't try Tremor on that machine.
Yeah, but it says something for it if it runs well on my machine. It's a tough thing, but I'm hopefully updating in a few months.


Image
A 4 year old mac you say? Well I bet you're using a 'superior' platform to test this now aren't you?
Image
Ashe37 wrote:I find it funny that you're a guitar pedal snob and yet don't own a single analog synth.

Kidney05
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 360
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 5:34 am
Gear: Juno 106, Tetra, Mopho Keyboard, Little Phatty Stage II, RX-5, Volcas, JX-3P, R5, 505, TX-7, D550, TX81Z, Korg MS-20 Mini, Minibrute, Six Traks, TR-8
Contact:

Re: Arturia: The New Generation

Post by Kidney05 » Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:02 am

BlackGnosis wrote:
Kidney05 wrote:
Ashe37 wrote:Sorry, I don't feel you can accurately review CPU usage of most new softsynths on something two CPU generations old (three gens if you count core2Quads). Btw, don't try Tremor on that machine.
Yeah, but it says something for it if it runs well on my machine. It's a tough thing, but I'm hopefully updating in a few months.


Image
A 4 year old mac you say? Well I bet you're using a 'superior' platform to test this now aren't you?
What is the "safe" assumption for what computer everyone has?

Ashe37
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3876
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 3:43 pm
Real name: Unpronounceable
Gear: Ensoniq SD-1/32,SQR,VFX,ESQm
Virus Indigo, M3-61 , MS2000BR, Volca Bass
Emu XL-7, Matrix 6r
TG-33, K3m, Blofeld, Micron, Mopho, BS II, JV-1080
Band: Eridani V
Location: Central VA

Re: Arturia: The New Generation

Post by Ashe37 » Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:50 am

Kidney05 wrote: What is the "safe" assumption for what computer everyone has?
I don't know specifically for audio, or for Macs, but the 'safe assumption' for PCs is supposed to be that they are running a 1 1/2 to two year old machine. Technically, mine is older, but at least its a 2.66 GHz Core2Quad, and it handles Arturia plugins well. My laptop, a 1.8 GHz i7, handles them somewhat better.

User avatar
BlackGnosis
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
Posts: 524
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 12:18 pm
Real name: Stormy
Gear: See signature image.
Band: Eridani V
Location: San Angelo, TX
Contact:

Re: Arturia: The New Generation

Post by BlackGnosis » Fri Aug 03, 2012 7:03 am

Kidney05 wrote:What is the "safe" assumption for what computer everyone has?
It pends the person, some have a commodore 64 as they have no use for anything current, others like myself meet their studio needs of the modern age with a okay proc (Low end i7) and use a DSP based audio interface to take the load off the computer (MOTU Ultralite mk3) while not everyone is willing to make such an investment, I'd guess most people here would be running (AMD equivalent) at least a higher i3 or a midrange i5 and some sort of DSP based Audio interface, even if its a Tascam its still far better then most internal cards (even if they have a DSP chip on board) What interface are you using to take the weight off your system?
Image
Ashe37 wrote:I find it funny that you're a guitar pedal snob and yet don't own a single analog synth.

Kidney05
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 360
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 5:34 am
Gear: Juno 106, Tetra, Mopho Keyboard, Little Phatty Stage II, RX-5, Volcas, JX-3P, R5, 505, TX-7, D550, TX81Z, Korg MS-20 Mini, Minibrute, Six Traks, TR-8
Contact:

Re: Arturia: The New Generation

Post by Kidney05 » Fri Aug 03, 2012 8:19 pm

BlackGnosis wrote:
Kidney05 wrote:What is the "safe" assumption for what computer everyone has?
It pends the person, some have a commodore 64 as they have no use for anything current, others like myself meet their studio needs of the modern age with a okay proc (Low end i7) and use a DSP based audio interface to take the load off the computer (MOTU Ultralite mk3) while not everyone is willing to make such an investment, I'd guess most people here would be running (AMD equivalent) at least a higher i3 or a midrange i5 and some sort of DSP based Audio interface, even if its a Tascam its still far better then most internal cards (even if they have a DSP chip on board) What interface are you using to take the weight off your system?
I've got an m-audio firewire solo. I really need to learn more about this-- too much synthing, not enough computer audio type stuff. What do you recommend when I upgrade?

Ashe37
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3876
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 3:43 pm
Real name: Unpronounceable
Gear: Ensoniq SD-1/32,SQR,VFX,ESQm
Virus Indigo, M3-61 , MS2000BR, Volca Bass
Emu XL-7, Matrix 6r
TG-33, K3m, Blofeld, Micron, Mopho, BS II, JV-1080
Band: Eridani V
Location: Central VA

Re: Arturia: The New Generation

Post by Ashe37 » Fri Aug 03, 2012 9:27 pm

Kidney05 wrote:
BlackGnosis wrote:
Kidney05 wrote:What is the "safe" assumption for what computer everyone has?
It pends the person, some have a commodore 64 as they have no use for anything current, others like myself meet their studio needs of the modern age with a okay proc (Low end i7) and use a DSP based audio interface to take the load off the computer (MOTU Ultralite mk3) while not everyone is willing to make such an investment, I'd guess most people here would be running (AMD equivalent) at least a higher i3 or a midrange i5 and some sort of DSP based Audio interface, even if its a Tascam its still far better then most internal cards (even if they have a DSP chip on board) What interface are you using to take the weight off your system?
I've got an m-audio firewire solo. I really need to learn more about this-- too much synthing, not enough computer audio type stuff. What do you recommend when I upgrade?

I'm assuming you're going with another mac... something in the i5 range should show a drastic improvement for you. Te M-Audio interface you are using isn't exactly known for its low latency either... I'd say you should try for an i7, but if getting an i5 means you can get a better audio interface then do so. My roomate has been able to get decent audio performance playing Arturia softsynths (specifically, Prophet V and Moog Modular V) on his late 2008 Macbook Pro (which has now been semi-retired) using a Presonus FireStudio Project as his audio interface.

Fredthehound
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 55
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 2:28 am

Re: Arturia: The New Generation

Post by Fredthehound » Sat Aug 04, 2012 4:59 am

I'm using an AMD Quad with the onboard stuff at the moment. I can easily run a few instances of the Jupiter 8V in Reaper 4. Where it gets dicey is in layering with high poly/long release times. A 32 voice string pad will lock the machine solid for several seconds. But in anything resembling 'normal' use several instances are no problem.

But a 'mere' 8 voice J8V pad is PLENTY impressive ;)

Ashe37
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3876
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 3:43 pm
Real name: Unpronounceable
Gear: Ensoniq SD-1/32,SQR,VFX,ESQm
Virus Indigo, M3-61 , MS2000BR, Volca Bass
Emu XL-7, Matrix 6r
TG-33, K3m, Blofeld, Micron, Mopho, BS II, JV-1080
Band: Eridani V
Location: Central VA

Re: Arturia: The New Generation

Post by Ashe37 » Sat Aug 04, 2012 5:20 am

Fredthehound wrote:I'm using an AMD Quad with the onboard stuff at the moment. I can easily run a few instances of the Jupiter 8V in Reaper 4. Where it gets dicey is in layering with high poly/long release times. A 32 voice string pad will lock the machine solid for several seconds. But in anything resembling 'normal' use several instances are no problem.

But a 'mere' 8 voice J8V pad is PLENTY impressive ;)

*which* AMD Quad?

Kidney05
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 360
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 5:34 am
Gear: Juno 106, Tetra, Mopho Keyboard, Little Phatty Stage II, RX-5, Volcas, JX-3P, R5, 505, TX-7, D550, TX81Z, Korg MS-20 Mini, Minibrute, Six Traks, TR-8
Contact:

Re: Arturia: The New Generation

Post by Kidney05 » Sat Aug 04, 2012 6:24 am

After I upgraded I was thinking of trying to get something with multiple inputs so I could sequence my hardware. I'm waiting for one of those new iMacs.

Post Reply