Limitations E-MU ESI 2000 vs software SF2

Discussions about anything related to samplers and sampling techniques.

Limitations E-MU ESI 2000 vs software SF2

Postby PabstBlueRibbon » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:35 pm

Dear all,

I couple of months ago I got myself a E-MU ESI 2000 sampler. The main reason for that is to add some character in the music. Presently modern electronic music is often produced by nothing more than a laptop with DAW-software. I like that rawness in the electronic music from the nineties or before.

Another reason is it's fun to have a 'vintage' sampler.

Preparing soundbank with a hardware sampler requires lits of patience. Especially with my sampler, because it lacks a graphical display. It's easier to do that with software like Viena or Polyphone. I spent a lot of time searching for ways to upload sf2-files to my hardware sampler. I also found some very useful info on this forum, so lots of gratitude to the one who posted it!

I have a few questions though...

Programming soundbanks with my ESI gives me the opportunity to add two layers per preset. I asume that is for stereo-sound or for a layered mono-sound. However I wonder if I convert and upload a preset from a SF2-file with more layers... can the ESI2000 handle that? (Because I am familiar with synths who seems to have a lot more editing functions when being controlled by a computer connected with MIDI-cables. So for example ... can I upload a multi-layered stereo piano to my ESI (of course the whole preset isn't allowed to be more than the RAM in the sampler).

Or are there alternative ways? Suppose the piano soundbank contains 4 layers of stereo-samples, than I have to split all those layers, however I hope I can play them all 4 simultaneously.

I hope someone can help me giving me answers.

Regards, Michael
User avatar
PabstBlueRibbon
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2017 5:30 pm
Location: The Netherlands
Real name: Michael
Gear: Roland RD700sx - SRX04 + SRX10
Roland TB-03
KORG MicroKORG
E-MU ESI 2000 - 128 MB, Turbo Board

Re: Limitations E-MU ESI 2000 vs software SF2

Postby blueknob » Sat Nov 18, 2017 9:06 am

hmm.. we like a brain scratching session in here :geek:

I think a sample can be stereo and same too for the secondary sample in a zone of a preset. The trick then is to try and use "Link" which points to another preset programmed up to take over where the first one left off (threshold setting etc.). I'm not sure how many Links can be made more than 2.

Methinks, programming all that up is a life-times ambition!
blueknob
Junior Member
Junior Member
 
Posts: 246
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:30 pm
Location: England, UK
Gear: ESi32/E6400U, Novation Supernova, Ensoniq (a shedful), vintage Macs, Hamm C3/122

Re: Limitations E-MU ESI 2000 vs software SF2

Postby madtheory » Sat Nov 18, 2017 3:36 pm

Yes blueknob is correct. A sample can be stereo, and you have primary and secondary zones for two velocity layers. And if you want more, you link them. The User Manual explains this all really well, it's an excellent manual.

But on the ESI2000 you really are working blind when you get into layering and zones. It certainly isn't a raw sounding sampler either. It is very pure sounding machine, and the transposing adds a subtle warmth. The analogue outs are a fairly poor design, prone to grounding noise. I always preferred the SPDIF output- you still get the warmth of the transposing there. The filters are really good, can be quite wild, but Kontakt can do all of the same filtering too. The modulation is more limited than in Kontakt, and the worst thing is the resolution of the parameters is quite coarse.

This was always a budget machine. Good in its day. It has very sloppy MIDI timing as well!

I would think, for the real hardware experience with a great intuitive user interface, an E4XT or ESynth would be much better, and not a whole lot more money to buy. If you want "nineties or before" rawness, then you need something older like an Emax 1 or 2, Akai S900, Yamaha TX16W Casio FZ-1 or the rawest of them all, Ensoniq Mirage.
User avatar
madtheory
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
 
Posts: 5035
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 12:45 pm
Location: Cork, Ireland
Real name: Tomas Mulcahy
Gear: Pro Tools, Komplete, MIDIQuest, Novation KSR, Casio FZ1+SK5, Korg Legacy, Theremin, Digi Vocalist, Quadravrb+, Kaoss Pads1+2, SPD11, OB Cyclone.
Band: Minim

Re: Limitations E-MU ESI 2000 vs software SF2

Postby PabstBlueRibbon » Sat Nov 18, 2017 5:57 pm

Yes, the manual is very clear, however the manual is +400 pages.

I never worked with samplers before. I tried to do things with SF2, however programming requires allready a lot of work.

I want to use it for some specific sounds like ARR1 from the Fairlight. I discovered some very good sounding samples from that sound: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=67623 That wouldn't be a problem I assume.

I found some very good sounding sf2-files with violin and other string-sounds. It would be awesome to get those presets into my sampler.

Just to make clear. My E-MU ESI has 129 Mb RAM and is updated to the latest version. Also it contains a turbo board
User avatar
PabstBlueRibbon
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2017 5:30 pm
Location: The Netherlands
Real name: Michael
Gear: Roland RD700sx - SRX04 + SRX10
Roland TB-03
KORG MicroKORG
E-MU ESI 2000 - 128 MB, Turbo Board

Re: Limitations E-MU ESI 2000 vs software SF2

Postby madtheory » Sat Nov 18, 2017 8:08 pm

It's not an easy machine, it's powerful. If you know SF2 inside out that makes it easier because Emu basically invented that format and their samplers have the same structure. If you want both ease and power, then ESynth, or Kontakt.
User avatar
madtheory
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
 
Posts: 5035
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 12:45 pm
Location: Cork, Ireland
Real name: Tomas Mulcahy
Gear: Pro Tools, Komplete, MIDIQuest, Novation KSR, Casio FZ1+SK5, Korg Legacy, Theremin, Digi Vocalist, Quadravrb+, Kaoss Pads1+2, SPD11, OB Cyclone.
Band: Minim

Re: Limitations E-MU ESI 2000 vs software SF2

Postby Hyde » Tue Feb 20, 2018 4:40 pm

Interested in the responses, here. I just picked an ESI2000 for $20, with full memory upgrade. I've sampled in a few things & it seems to work great. 128mb is way beyond what I'm accustomed to, as well. Cool old machines.
Makin' Noises
User avatar
Hyde
Junior Member
Junior Member
 
Posts: 173
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2015 4:45 pm
Gear: Ensoniq Mirage-EPS-EPS16-ASR10
Ensoniq SQ1-SQ1+
Akai S2000
E-MU ESI2000

Re: Limitations E-MU ESI 2000 vs software SF2

Postby PabstBlueRibbon » Sun Mar 11, 2018 2:31 pm

Hello everybody,

Sorry for the delay. I was very busy with some other stuff.

My sampler is still being unused :P I have tons of (complex) ideas but don't know where to begin.

I've found a while ago a very good soundfont of a multilayered grand piano, however the whole soundbank is roughly between 300 and 400 Mb. If it was easy to make loops out of the samples then it would be awesome to use it with such a sampler, however making loops from 5x88 sound samples and program them so the release decays in a natural way seems like a whooooooole lot of work
User avatar
PabstBlueRibbon
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2017 5:30 pm
Location: The Netherlands
Real name: Michael
Gear: Roland RD700sx - SRX04 + SRX10
Roland TB-03
KORG MicroKORG
E-MU ESI 2000 - 128 MB, Turbo Board

Re: Limitations E-MU ESI 2000 vs software SF2

Postby Hyde » Tue May 15, 2018 12:45 am

You should be able to find something. There's an E-MU Sampler Facebook page.
I bet someone, there has a paino file
Makin' Noises
User avatar
Hyde
Junior Member
Junior Member
 
Posts: 173
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2015 4:45 pm
Gear: Ensoniq Mirage-EPS-EPS16-ASR10
Ensoniq SQ1-SQ1+
Akai S2000
E-MU ESI2000


Return to Samplers

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests