Yeah, there was a time I thought editing loop points in decimal was an upgrade. Try looping on a Mirage in hex. Actually that's not even the hard part with the mirage, the hard part is that it doesn't really loop well unless the loop length is a multiple of a page (256 samples I think). Try making a loop that's exactly 256 samples by ear!tallowwaters wrote:Yeah, I found my eyes a very important part of the process when looping on my Emax II: 0008902 2765443
Really, I do get your point, working on the hardware samplers you end up relying on your ear more, and you do get better at working with samples by ear as a result. I just think that's an even better argument for software samplers (or at least very robust graphical sample manipulation interfaces).