SP-555 vs. MPC-1000 as Master Clock

Discussions about anything related to samplers and sampling techniques.
Post Reply
User avatar
analoglsd
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
Posts: 578
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 7:53 am
Real name: Lance
Gear: Buchla Music Easel, TE OP-1, Korg MS-20, Yamaha RS-7000, Effects Pedals
Location: Oakland, CA
Contact:

SP-555 vs. MPC-1000 as Master Clock

Post by analoglsd » Tue Nov 23, 2010 11:45 pm

Hi,
I'm using a SP-555 as a master clock which is going MIDI-out to an Electrix Repeater and an Electro-Hamonix 2880.
I was wondering if there would be any advantages to using the MPC1000 as a master clock as opposed to the SP-555.
Thanks.

blavatsky
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
Posts: 451
Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 3:54 pm
Gear: MV8800, Sub37, Integra 7, Mininova, Fusion, Biscuit, TimeFactor, SP-555, SP-404, SPD-SX
Band: Blavatsky
Contact:

Re: SP-555 vs. MPC-1000 as Master Clock

Post by blavatsky » Wed Nov 24, 2010 4:16 pm

I don't have any exact evidence but I think it's perceived the MPC 1000 has a more rock-solid, tight MIDI clock than most pieces.
I think they are both 96 ppqn resolution.

cartesia
Expert Member
Expert Member
Posts: 1287
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 7:55 am
Gear: Octatrack
Bass Station 2
Band: TBA

Re: SP-555 vs. MPC-1000 as Master Clock

Post by cartesia » Thu Nov 25, 2010 1:26 am

being able to sequence other gear! being able to control other gear from the one place - mute/unmute indiv. midi tracks, etc..

having a more powerful sampler (but hardly any effects + no live looper)
better pads

I love the SP way of working, but I don't think of them as 'leader' boxes.

User avatar
griffin avid
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
Posts: 1568
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 11:08 am
Location: New York
Contact:

Re: SP-555 vs. MPC-1000 as Master Clock

Post by griffin avid » Thu Nov 25, 2010 2:46 am

I'm guessing when you say Master Clock, you mean you start the MPC and all your other gear kicks in. In other words, you're only using it as a Start/Stop and TEMPO master. Both can do that task just fine.


The MPC 1000 would be better used if you intended to build all the sequences in that one box. Obviously the A&B MIDI ports (two MIDI ins and two midi outs) would come in handy when you start to add other pieces. That's one thing I've always appreciated about MPCs.
Music Product: Better Sounds for Beats http://www.StudioAVX.com
Music Production: Resources and Research http://www.ProducersEdgeMagazine.com
Music Produced: Abstract Hip Hop Sci-Fi: http://www.TheDynamicUniverse.com

User avatar
analoglsd
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
Posts: 578
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 7:53 am
Real name: Lance
Gear: Buchla Music Easel, TE OP-1, Korg MS-20, Yamaha RS-7000, Effects Pedals
Location: Oakland, CA
Contact:

Re: SP-555 vs. MPC-1000 as Master Clock

Post by analoglsd » Thu Nov 25, 2010 8:27 pm

griffin avid wrote:I'm guessing when you say Master Clock, you mean you start the MPC and all your other gear kicks in. In other words, you're only using it as a Start/Stop and TEMPO master. Both can do that task just fine.


The MPC 1000 would be better used if you intended to build all the sequences in that one box. Obviously the A&B MIDI ports (two MIDI ins and two midi outs) would come in handy when you start to add other pieces. That's one thing I've always appreciated about MPCs.

No, I'm just using the sampler as the tempo master.
I would actually prefer that the gear wasn't sending start/stop messages to each other.
Is there a way to stop that and just have the BPM info sent with no other commands sent?

User avatar
Em Pe Ge
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 12:58 am
Gear: Akai MPC1000, Moog Slim Phatty, Roland Alpha Juno 1, Animoog (via iRig midi), Ableton Live, Reason.
Location: Ohio

Re: SP-555 vs. MPC-1000 as Master Clock

Post by Em Pe Ge » Thu Nov 25, 2010 9:34 pm

i don't think so...

Post Reply