The most over-used terms used to describe sound
Forum rules
READ: VSE Board-Wide Rules and Guidelines
READ: VSE Board-Wide Rules and Guidelines
-
- Junior Member
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:00 pm
- Real name: Vincent
- Gear: ESX, MPC 2500, EPS16+, TX16w, TX81z, Micro Q, Microbrute, Bass Station 2, MS-20 Mini, Nord Lead 2, Machinedrum, D-50, QS7.1, loads of effects...
- Band: Purplewave
- Location: Missouri
- Contact:
The most over-used terms used to describe sound
Here's my list:
1. "punchy"
end of list.
Partially kidding, but in all seriousness, has anyone read the user comments for most of the samplers here on VSE? There's pretty much at least one person who has described virtually every sampler reviewed on this site as "punchy," which leads me to believe that "punchy" means nothing aside from the fact that it plays back sound. Such a generic descriptor.
1. "punchy"
end of list.
Partially kidding, but in all seriousness, has anyone read the user comments for most of the samplers here on VSE? There's pretty much at least one person who has described virtually every sampler reviewed on this site as "punchy," which leads me to believe that "punchy" means nothing aside from the fact that it plays back sound. Such a generic descriptor.
- Percivale
- Junior Member
- Posts: 227
- Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2013 1:56 am
- Gear: Blofeld, Juno-106, AN1X, MB-6582/SEQ V4, etc
- Location: SG Synthesizers Group
- Contact:
Re: The most over-used terms used to describe sound
"gives you that 808/909.."
Join - SG Synthesizers Group
- ninja6485
- Synth Explorer
- Posts: 2770
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:13 pm
- Gear: Virus Ti, Jx-8p, Juno 60, Radias, Maschine, 101,303,606,707,727,808,909, odyssey, mirage, akai s5K/s2K/s1k, drumtraks, E6400ult, M1R, rx5, fizmo,d50
- Band: Subliminal Sea
- Location: Exton/ westchester
- Contact:
Re: The most over-used terms used to describe sound
fat/Phat. warm takes the cake though. Also, "sits well in a mix" can be overused. With the Jx-8p I get it, especially compared to the d-50, but the phrase has definitly taken on a life of its own!
This looks like a psychotropic reaction. No wonder it's so popular...
-
- Junior Member
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 10:32 am
- Real name: Casey
- Gear: Ensoniq VFX
KORG Monotron
KORG Triton
Peavey Fury 1992
Peavey KB-300
Peavey Milestone 1984
Roland JX-8P
Waldorf Micro Q
Yamaha KX5
Yamaha SY77
Re: The most over-used terms used to describe sound
Sterile
Cold
As far as I'm concerned a synth either sounds good, or it sounds like garbage. Thankfully there are more good sounding synths than ones I feel compelled to throw through a window.
Cold
As far as I'm concerned a synth either sounds good, or it sounds like garbage. Thankfully there are more good sounding synths than ones I feel compelled to throw through a window.
- meatballfulton
- Moderator
- Posts: 6096
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 9:29 pm
- Gear: Logic Pro X
Re: The most over-used terms used to describe sound
Organic
I listened to Hatfield and the North at Rainbow. They were very wonderful and they made my heart a prisoner.
- Sir Ruff
- Synth Explorer
- Posts: 3519
- Joined: Tue May 09, 2006 11:55 pm
- Gear: Two persimmon modulators and a frequency adjudicator.
- Band: Ruff in the jungle
- Location: Philadelphia
Re: The most over-used terms used to describe sound
Yeah, the context of samplers, it's definitely overused and needs to be qualified further. In my mind, there are two types of "grit/grunge" you can achieve with samplers--noticeable high-end aliasing as a result of no anti-aliasing filter (a la SP-1200/Emax 1/Mirage), and general top-end reduction (due to anti-aliasing filter) and resultant mid-range boosting (a la early Akais). A lot of "heads" just want to call anything that has lost its high end "gritty", but can't clarify how.monolith wrote:Grit/gritty
Another perfectly valid term that's only lost its meaning due to overuse. I would argue that in the synth world, this can really only apply to VCO-based synths (or those that mimic them), and specifically those with limited autotuning ability (i.e., the OBX, but not the Xpander; any Yamaha CS- polysynth; the Alesis Ion with its authentic "detune" function). But, saying that, I have also described my SQ-80 as sounding digitally "organic" (an oxymoron I know) just because when you're dealing with waveforms with such low sample/bit-rates, they develop a unique character of their own (similar to the uber-aliased nature of the Mirage). But even more than the Mirage, this is particularly true on the SQ80 because of how the multisampling leads to weird shifts in sound quality across the scale. So it's really heterogenous (and "organic") in that sense.meatballfulton wrote:Organic
Do you even post on vse bro?
-
- Junior Member
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 10:32 am
- Real name: Casey
- Gear: Ensoniq VFX
KORG Monotron
KORG Triton
Peavey Fury 1992
Peavey KB-300
Peavey Milestone 1984
Roland JX-8P
Waldorf Micro Q
Yamaha KX5
Yamaha SY77
Re: The most over-used terms used to describe sound
I would say FM synths are organic, they can make some sounds that blur the lines of what's "a synthesizer sound" and something from the natural world. Though in the living aspect of organic, something that's temperamental as an octogenarian and drifts more than a 16 year old that just saw Fast and the Furious I can see where that'd apply as well.Sir Ruff wrote:Another perfectly valid term that's only lost its meaning due to overuse. I would argue that in the synth world, this can really only apply to VCO-based synths (or those that mimic them), and specifically those with limited autotuning ability (i.e., the OBX, but not the Xpander; any Yamaha CS- polysynth; the Alesis Ion with its authentic "detune" function). But, saying that, I have also described my SQ-80 as sounding digitally "organic" (an oxymoron I know) just because when you're dealing with waveforms with such low sample/bit-rates, they develop a unique character of their own (similar to the uber-aliased nature of the Mirage). But even more than the Mirage, this is particularly true on the SQ80 because of how the multisampling leads to weird shifts in sound quality across the scale. So it's really heterogenous (and "organic") in that sense.meatballfulton wrote:Organic
- Jabberwalky
- Synth Explorer
- Posts: 2163
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 6:03 pm
- Gear: A hybrid of vintage and modern junk
- Band: Variar
- Location: Pgh, PA
- Contact:
Re: The most over-used terms used to describe sound
Describing sound is hard.
- supermel74
- Senior Member
- Posts: 965
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 8:56 am
- Location: Maine
- Contact:
Re: The most over-used terms used to describe sound
vanilla, lush
-
- Junior Member
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 10:32 am
- Real name: Casey
- Gear: Ensoniq VFX
KORG Monotron
KORG Triton
Peavey Fury 1992
Peavey KB-300
Peavey Milestone 1984
Roland JX-8P
Waldorf Micro Q
Yamaha KX5
Yamaha SY77
Re: The most over-used terms used to describe sound
Synthy. 
Someone had to do it.

Someone had to do it.
- Psy_Free
- Supporting Member!
- Posts: 818
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 6:36 pm
- Gear: Synths 'n' stuff.
- Band: Klangzeit
- Location: UK
- Contact:
Re: The most over-used terms used to describe sound
Unless used to describe a Hammond soundmeatballfulton wrote:Organic

-
- Supporting Member!
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 3:54 pm
- Gear: MV8800, Sub37, Integra 7, Mininova, Fusion, Biscuit, TimeFactor, SP-555, SP-404, SPD-SX
- Band: Blavatsky
- Contact:
Re: The most over-used terms used to describe sound
analog or analog-ish
anything with a synth sounding "like a sega genesis" or NES or 8-bit
anything with a synth sounding "like a sega genesis" or NES or 8-bit
- madtheory
- Supporting Member!
- Posts: 5399
- Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 12:45 pm
- Real name: Tomas Mulcahy
- Gear: Wurlitzer Opus 1536, Model F, Morovdis Arpeggiator, Maplin My First EQ, Jeff Wayne Thunderchild rack, Thermostat, Buck Owens' Moog.
- Location: Cork, Ireland
- Contact:
Re: The most over-used terms used to describe sound
Mos def. It needs a common language (ok, that's a tautology, but you know what I mean). That's why the "over-used" words are so annoying, they don't mean quite the same thing to everyone, and most of the time there are several ways to make something "warm" or "cold" or whatever.Jabberwalky wrote:Describing sound is hard.
So how do we get a common language? Through technical ear training. This here is the best set of exercises I've seen (and I've done a lot of research on it), but you need the book for the instructions:
https://sites.google.com/a/umich.edu/ja ... r-training