
Thanks in advance!
K
prophei wrote:i have both the andromeda and the poly evolver keyboard... and love both. as has been stated, the digital and weirder options on the PEK give it that spice that really makes it a wild synth. on top of that, and to me personally, the sequencer is what really brings this synth into a league of its own... especially with those synthesis options and the way you can automate them in the sequencer. especially with the more non-traditional triggering options. truly brilliant.
if you are looking for a modern synth that is just analog and huge... with no BS for getting too tweaky... I would have a hard time recommending anything other than the andromeda. that synth is an unbelievable monster. the endless power, the beautiful filters and overall quality of this synth are remarkable. i think you can get 10x the sounds out of this than any sort of prophet, old or new. at least in the analog domain.
they are both top of their class to me. not that it ultimately matters, but i have owned, and still own a lot of older vintage stuff... and stand by my statements about those two.
Yup. I will say that PE needs a bit of coaxing to sound vintagey. There's the Oscillator Slop function to make the DCOs sound more like VCOs but it's not as strong as on the Prophet and Tetra. But add a bit of LFO for just a hint of warble and you're good to go.bsh wrote:If you don't use the extra digital oscillators and signal processing, it's more or less a prophet 8 with half the voices. Yes, a few minor differences, but no warmer or more analog sounding and made from mostly the same parts.
In that case you might be happier with the Prophet with its all-analog signal path and additional voices. No need to pay for wavetables, digital effects, wacked out sequencing, and a board full of knobs if you're not going to use them.krispy wrote:I'm a bit of a purist when it comes to warm analog sounds etc
K