Thought about synthesizers channel multiplexing

Pulling out your hair? Don't know what to do or where to go? Ask in here.
Forum rules
READ: VSE Board-Wide Rules and Guidelines

If your Help request has been solved, please edit your first post in order to select the Image Topic Icon to let others know your topic has been solved.
Mooger5
Expert Member
Expert Member
Posts: 1459
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 5:11 pm
Location: Lisbon

Re: Thought about synthesizers channel multiplexing

Post by Mooger5 » Mon Apr 24, 2017 6:46 pm

From 85 to 87 there was an upmarket Denon CD player, the DCD1500 which used one PCM54HP per channel. Denon dubbed it "double super linear converter". Interesting.

Image
Herrare umanum est.

Mooger5
Expert Member
Expert Member
Posts: 1459
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 5:11 pm
Location: Lisbon

Re: Thought about synthesizers channel multiplexing

Post by Mooger5 » Fri May 05, 2017 6:19 pm

So I´m on a hardware Reverb phase right now, having just added an LXP-5 and a Midiverb 2 to my rig. So couldn´t help but notice the current crop of reverb pedals out there. I knew there was something goin on in the industry.

So jxalex, have you seen this http://www.spinsemi.com/products.html ? Stereo inputs and outputs, plus DSP and DACs on a SOIC-28 chip! It´s not the future, it´s the present. Is there a point in making single DACs anymore, when there´s this level of integration available?
Herrare umanum est.

jxalex
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 475
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 6:05 am
Gear: enough
Location: Sweden

Re: Thought about synthesizers channel multiplexing

Post by jxalex » Wed May 17, 2017 1:22 pm

,,
Last edited by jxalex on Tue May 23, 2017 10:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

jxalex
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 475
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 6:05 am
Gear: enough
Location: Sweden

Re: Thought about synthesizers channel multiplexing

Post by jxalex » Thu May 18, 2017 1:07 pm

..
Last edited by jxalex on Tue May 23, 2017 10:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
madtheory
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
Posts: 5319
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 12:45 pm
Real name: Tomas Mulcahy
Gear: Wurlitzer Opus 1536, Model F, Morovdis Arpeggiator, Maplin My First EQ, Jeff Wayne Thunderchild rack, Thermostat, Buck Owens' Moog.
Location: Cork, Ireland
Contact:

Re: Thought about synthesizers channel multiplexing

Post by madtheory » Thu May 18, 2017 2:50 pm

Awesome. Can you do an AB? Old DA vs new DA?

jxalex
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 475
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 6:05 am
Gear: enough
Location: Sweden

Re: Thought about synthesizers channel multiplexing

Post by jxalex » Tue May 23, 2017 10:41 pm

Here in this forum happens some my posts random deleting here and neither I am notified by this happening.
So it seems quite pointless with contributions.

User avatar
Stab Frenzy
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 9723
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 5:41 pm
Gear: Eurorack, RYTM, Ultranova, many FX
Location: monster island*
Contact:

Re: Thought about synthesizers channel multiplexing

Post by Stab Frenzy » Wed May 24, 2017 5:02 am

The answer is because synths are designed by engineers.

"An optimist will tell you the glass is half-full; the pessimist, half-empty; and the engineer will tell you the glass is twice the size it needs to be"

"Any idiot can build a bridge that stands, it takes an engineer to build a bridge that barely stands"

etc

User avatar
madtheory
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
Posts: 5319
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 12:45 pm
Real name: Tomas Mulcahy
Gear: Wurlitzer Opus 1536, Model F, Morovdis Arpeggiator, Maplin My First EQ, Jeff Wayne Thunderchild rack, Thermostat, Buck Owens' Moog.
Location: Cork, Ireland
Contact:

Re: Thought about synthesizers channel multiplexing

Post by madtheory » Wed May 24, 2017 4:01 pm

I downlaoded the AB WAV. Very subtle differences. Which Roland was it? Seems to me every second one sounds a bit fuller, the DX EP has more bass. So is every second one the old DA? Because those seemed to have more background noise? Is there an EQ somewhere in that path with the old DA? It was often rumoured to be so.

But the test does not have enough sounds to go on I think, and are some of the performances not identical?

jxalex
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 475
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 6:05 am
Gear: enough
Location: Sweden

Re: Thought about synthesizers channel multiplexing

Post by jxalex » Wed May 24, 2017 8:21 pm

It was Roland JD990..
The AB comparison was that first was NEW and second was old, if it was NEW-OLD....xxx.WAV file. THe old one has more background noise, yes.

Every second was the OLD DAC with its own filterEQ.
It is not only rumor, it is the fact that it has its some strange filterEQ at the end. ALso the JD800 and D50 has.
It was different becouse the original JD990 does not have flat filter, (it adds bass and midrange). So yes, the ROland had some its own EQ in the path. Strange why they did it so. When using the same filterEQ as the original, then it is the same. Whereas I choosed deliberately the filter from XV5080 (which is flat LPF 12dB/oct filter).
But when using the JD990 filterEQ at the end as the original then all sounds the same, except the
lower distortion and background noise.

Post Reply