Dr. Phibes wrote:An extremely limited edition voyager covered with pictures of Marc Doty's face.

Blasphemy!

honestly Moog is in the same place as Apple. Both companies no longer have their founders around to guide them. And both companies will be flamed by the same people who buy their stuff no matter what they do. Moog comes out with another Mini spin off=rehash. :evil: Moog comes out with the Sub37=not...

GuyaGuy wrote:Quick quiz: Which is the low hanging fruit?
1. Ordering new colors for your existing product from your parts source
2. Researching and developing a completely new product

Hint: It's not #2.

Ha ha, this is perfect.

No! just...no!. Moog needs to stop reissuing the same goddamn synth over and over with slightly different LED lights or a new alminium finish. And get to making NEW synths. This is becoming ridiculous. It's just pointless fan service. Moog is a company. They sell stuff to make money. Get over it. H...

I'll take Mr. Hideaway's design, thank you!

If not that, though.. I think I'd take the Resonator in the Korg PS-3100.

I LIKE IT BETTER THAN YOU DO

I LIKE IT

i have one of these with the programmer, its a fairly shallow menu dive, but still a menu dive! its nice to be able to see the relative positions of all the knobs at a glance. im bothered by menu systems, so i would just buy a programmer, but $500 is ridiculous, i know modeless recently sold some J...

I will never grasp the concept that a two-oscillator polysynth like the JX3P is less expensive than the Juno 6 and the Juno 106, which are both single-oscillator synths with less functionality. I was never a big fan of the programing necessary for a JX without the PG-200... but it's really easy to d...

I wonder what you're basing that idea of the 'sequencing crowd' on. As somebody who probably falls into that category I don't agree with your reasoning at all, in fact it's probably the polar opposite of the reality. When you're playing a sequence, as calaverasgrande pointed out, you want maximum t...

Seems to me that the guys that actually play chords and notes with both hands , are not as hung up about VA and digital vs analog as the monosynth guys. Those that do prefer analog synths seem to be happy with sequencing for the most part. Yeah I am generalizing. Well, see... and that's another thi...

pflosi wrote:I always wondered why you don't have a Vermona Perfourmer AG - it will do just that and has been produced after 1975.

You and me, both.

Stab Frenzy wrote:I'm glad all this off topic rehashing of the mono versus poly rubbish is drowning out the actually discussion of how a company can actually make a new poly these days.

I don't think you're telling the truth, Stabby.

I haven't seen a Wurlitzer of any kind go for much less than $700 in a long time. If you see them for those prices, you should buy them. All of them.

Face it, if you want to play a chord, it's more feasible to hit all the notes on your keyboard at the same time (poly) than it is to hit those notes individually in multiple passes, on-time, when multitracking. (Yes, you could play along with a click track, etc., but that limits the flexibility to ...