Re: DSI MoPho
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 8:43 pm
Vintage Synth Explorer Forums
Synthesizer Discussion Forums
https://forum.vintagesynth.com/
DSI MoPho
Page 9 of 25
Re: DSI MoPho
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 9:05 pm
Sounds very drony like the Evolver, which is a good and bad thing. Good because you get the suboscillator which gives it more low end, bad because it won't exactly replace the monosynths that we'd hope to replace it with, which aren't very drony at all.
Re: DSI MoPho
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 9:17 pm
Surely droniness is just a function of how long your notes are?
Re: DSI MoPho
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 9:18 pm
:-#
Re: DSI MoPho
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 9:39 pm
I'll take the orange one with white lettering and white hardware...pricklyrobot wrote:My take on brightly colored but not hideous:
Re: DSI MoPho
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 9:53 pm
Sounds cool but it also sounds very evolver-esque. I'd be curious to hear samples intended to sound more vintage. I think that would be the main reason a person would want to purchase this over an evolver.guesswho wrote:Anyone catch the demos? If not here you go:
http://www.trippler.net/files/p1/mopho1.mp3
http://www.trippler.net/files/p1/mopho2.mp3
http://www.trippler.net/files/p1/mopho3.mp3
http://www.trippler.net/files/p1/mopho4.mp3
http://www.trippler.net/files/p1/mopho5.mp3
Re: DSI MoPho
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 10:12 pm
How come you didn't find this one:guesswho wrote:Anyone catch the demos? If not here you go:
Rookieband
Re: DSI MoPho
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 10:35 pm
I didn't want to release all your secrets.
Thanks for sharing those even if you didn't actually "share" them publicly.
(for those that don't know, these are in fact demos by DocT)
Re: DSI MoPho
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 11:03 pm
Stab Frenzy wrote:I hope DSI make a lot of money from this synth, but I'm not gonna buy a synth that's made for preset bashers and is just an evolver with all the good stuff taken out. Seriously, something with no edit matrix on the front? It's like a freakin Micron*.
* Yes I'm aware the Micron has sold heaps and sounds really good.
Re: DSI MoPho
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 12:42 am
I've said it before but I do like the new DSi products oscillators. Even though they may not be drifty like Moogs of old they do sound good when doing sync and PWM. I wonder if that filter could be worked a little by adding in small modulations like noise & slow lfo > cutoff.
Re: DSI MoPho
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 1:04 am
Glad to see you folks tackling the important issues.tyrannosaurus mark wrote:I wish DSI spent more time making their synths look nice. The DEVO was so so ugly, and now this. THey could take a leaf out of Elektron's book
Re: DSI MoPho
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 1:48 am
I thought that I had read it was multitimberal, but with all the info removed everywhere I can't confirm this. Anyone recall if I'm correct?
Re: DSI MoPho
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 2:00 am
It would need more analog chips for each part multitimberal so I highly doubt it is...guesswho wrote:I thought that I had read it was multitimberal, but with all the info removed everywhere I can't confirm this. Anyone recall if I'm correct?
Re: DSI MoPho
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 2:02 am
Yes, it's 128 part multitimbral, the only issue being that as it's monophonic you can only hear one voice at a time.guesswho wrote:I thought that I had read it was multitimberal, but with all the info removed everywhere I can't confirm this. Anyone recall if I'm correct?
Has anyone else noticed there hasn't been any Blofeld key discussion since this got leaked?
Re: DSI MoPho
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 2:28 am
Haha. LOL! That's what I figured. I'm not the smartest person by any means, but I was sure that I had read it, and I just couldn't figure out how it could be possible. I just had me a blackie1 moment.Stab Frenzy wrote: Yes, it's 128 part multitimbral, the only issue being that as it's monophonic you can only hear one voice at a time.
