Why we're we given synths sooner?

Discussions about anything analog, digital, MIDI, synth technology, techniques, theories and more.
User avatar
tom Cadillac
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 376
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 4:49 am
Gear: FS1R, EPS, JP8000, Kaos pad, Ineko, SP606, Mopho, MP7 and so on....
Band: Bipolarbass
Location: Auckland NZ

Why we're we given synths sooner?

Post by tom Cadillac » Sun Oct 03, 2010 12:41 am

Don't know if this is a useful topic.

Have just been listening to an early soft machine CD. Everytime the poor sod on keys starts playing I have to stop listening. Why didn't someone give him a synth? That organ sound is just so goddam lame. This was a great experimental band and he's trying so hard to do something interesting. But its pre-synth and basically he's screwed.

I often wonder why the tech was historically so out of sync with the musicians. If only it had been sooner.

And we had to wait till the 80s - surely one of music's lowest eras - for bands like Duran Duran to underuse the fabulous instruments that were suddenly available. :(
"On the following day , the sorcery undespairingly continued: I changed my series, chose other sequences, cut other lengths, spliced different progressions, and hoped afresh for a miracle in sound." (Stockhausen)

User avatar
Phollop Willing PA
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 840
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 3:47 pm
Gear: Korg, Moog, Roland, Alesis, ARP, Yamaha, Future Retro
Location: Nova Scotia

Re: Why we're we given synths sooner?

Post by Phollop Willing PA » Sun Oct 03, 2010 12:46 am

I like Soft Machine.
MOOGSig: Voyager/Theremin, ROLAND: JP8000/MC505/MC50/SH1000/Octapad1/RE 20, CASIO VLtone, KORG: Prophecy/MS2000R/Kaos Pad2/D3200/D888/SDD4000/M3, BOSS SP202/DR110, YAMAHA:CS40M/QX7/WX7/QY10/Reface DX, ARP Exp, MACBETH M5, FR ORB, SONNET, ALESIS SR18

User avatar
sequentialsoftshock
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
Posts: 2415
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 1:57 am
Real name: Zayne
Gear: Pro One, Analog Keys, Prophet 5, MPC60, TR606, RD8, St. Vincent Guitar, Bluesbreaker amp
Location: Philadelphia
Contact:

Re: Why we're we given synths sooner?

Post by sequentialsoftshock » Sun Oct 03, 2010 12:49 am

Why weren't we all given books on grammar sooner?

User avatar
tom Cadillac
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 376
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 4:49 am
Gear: FS1R, EPS, JP8000, Kaos pad, Ineko, SP606, Mopho, MP7 and so on....
Band: Bipolarbass
Location: Auckland NZ

Re: Why we're we given synths sooner?

Post by tom Cadillac » Sun Oct 03, 2010 1:58 am

I love Soft Machine too - so many great moments, but don't you feel Mike Ratledge is let down by the keys he is playing?

I'v just asked for help with my grammar from an Indian nurse and she says "please being kind to each other and staying on topic is so nice!" :D
"On the following day , the sorcery undespairingly continued: I changed my series, chose other sequences, cut other lengths, spliced different progressions, and hoped afresh for a miracle in sound." (Stockhausen)

monolith
Expert Member
Expert Member
Posts: 1172
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:37 am

Re: Why we're we given synths sooner?

Post by monolith » Sun Oct 03, 2010 2:11 am

sequentialsoftshock wrote:Why weren't we all given books on grammar sooner?
Come on man... if you're directing that at Tomcadillac, you're really splitting hairs. People do far far worse than that on here. Play nice! :mrgreen:


I dig Soft Machine too - I love the organ!

User avatar
Automatic Gainsay
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
Posts: 3962
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:22 am
Real name: Marc Doty
Gear: Minimoog, 2600, CS-15, CS-50, MiniBrute, MicroBrute, S2, Korg MS-20 Mini, 3 Volcas, Pro 2, Leipzig, Pianet T, Wurli 7300, Wurli 145-A, ASR-10, e6400.
Band: Godfrey's Cordial
Location: Tacoma
Contact:

Re: Why we're we given synths sooner?

Post by Automatic Gainsay » Sun Oct 03, 2010 2:34 am

It wasn't really pre-synth.
‎"I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." -Charles Babbage
"Unity and Mediocrity are forever in bed together." -Zane W.
http://www.youtube.com/automaticgainsay

Virgule
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 385
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 8:46 pm

Re: Why we're we given synths sooner?

Post by Virgule » Sun Oct 03, 2010 3:16 am

:)
Last edited by Virgule on Mon Oct 11, 2010 8:46 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Solderman
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
Posts: 1799
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 5:43 pm

Re: Why we're we given synths sooner?

Post by Solderman » Sun Oct 03, 2010 3:48 am

Automatic Gainsay wrote:It wasn't really pre-synth.
Yeah, so perhaps the more appropriate question would be why someone would choose not to use them if they were in an(y) experimental band. I wouldn't hold it against anyone, personally. Eno and Fripp didn't use synths for everything, just one example.
I am no longer in pursuit of vintage synths. The generally absurd inflation from demand versus practical use and maintenance costs is no longer viable. The internet has suffocated and vanquished yet another wonderful hobby. Too bad.
--Solderman no more.

User avatar
tim gueguen
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 795
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 2:31 am
Location: the Canadian Prairies
Contact:

Re: Why we're we given synths sooner?

Post by tim gueguen » Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:03 am

Some people just didn't like the early synths. Tony Kaye left Yes because they wanted him to play synth and he didn't like the idea. Later with the band Badger he would get so frustrated with a Mellotron he was using he pushed it off the stage into the orchestra pit of the venue he was playing at. I'd guess he found that Robert Fripp was correct when he quipped "Tuning a Mellotron doesn't."
Keys: Realistic Concertmate 500, Korg K25, Korg Micro X

Guits: '86 Fender Japan '50s Reissue Strat, '80 Aria Pro II TS-300 Thor Sound

User avatar
b3groover
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 965
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 7:41 am
Real name: Jim
Band: THEO
Location: Lansing, MI
Contact:

Re: Why we're we given synths sooner?

Post by b3groover » Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:22 am

I like the organ (surprise, given my alias!) I think he got some interesting sounds out of it and played it differently than other people at the time. It's called using what you have to express yourself. He probably wasn't sitting there thinking "s**t, I wish I had a 16 voice polyphonic analog synthesizer with built-in effects and a ribbon controller; then this s**t would be REALLY happening!" He just made music.

A lesson to be learned from that.

User avatar
tekkentool
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
Posts: 3218
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 10:51 am
Real name: Steve
Gear: Lasers (ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ ωส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้)
Band: none currently
Location: Sydney, australia.(I moved)

Re: Why we're we given synths sooner?

Post by tekkentool » Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:30 am

b3groover wrote:I like the organ (surprise, given my alias!) I think he got some interesting sounds out of it and played it differently than other people at the time. It's called using what you have to express yourself. He probably wasn't sitting there thinking "s**t, I wish I had a 16 voice polyphonic analog synthesizer with built-in effects and a ribbon controller; then this s**t would be REALLY happening!" He just made music.

A lesson to be learned from that.
+1 :)

User avatar
nathanscribe
VSE Review Contributor
VSE Review Contributor
Posts: 2889
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 1:03 pm
Location: The right side of the Pennines
Contact:

Re: Why we're we given synths sooner?

Post by nathanscribe » Sun Oct 03, 2010 11:38 am

The worst thing about Soft Machine is Karl Jenkins' subsequent career in anodyne bullshit.

paugui
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 364
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 12:47 pm
Location: Marinha Grande, Portugal / Oslo, Norway

Re: Why we're we given synths sooner?

Post by paugui » Sun Oct 03, 2010 1:12 pm

b3groover wrote:"s**t, I wish I had a 16 voice polyphonic analog synthesizer with built-in effects and a ribbon controller; then this s**t would be REALLY happening!"
That sounds just like an advertisement to an Alesis Andromeda :P


But back on topic... I quite like Soft Machine too.
The earliest of their works I have is Third, and that is undoubtedly an amazing work.
All of it sounds just great...
I don't remember to hear any synth sounds.

If the music is good, I don't think there is any problem with not using synths ;)

User avatar
meatballfulton
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 6310
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 9:29 pm
Gear: Logic Pro X

Re: Why we're we given synths sooner?

Post by meatballfulton » Sun Oct 03, 2010 1:59 pm

tom Cadillac wrote:I love Soft Machine too - so many great moments, but don't you feel Mike Ratledge is let down by the keys he is playing?
I can't imagine that using synth sounds rather than his Lowrey organ would have improved Ratledge's playing any.

Once they did start using synths on 7 their music was becoming a lot less interesting.
I listened to Hatfield and the North at Rainbow. They were very wonderful and they made my heart a prisoner.

User avatar
Syn303
Expert Member
Expert Member
Posts: 1400
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 3:46 pm
Gear: Quite a bit...
Band: Syn303
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: Why we're we given synths sooner?

Post by Syn303 » Sun Oct 03, 2010 2:12 pm

Aah Soft Machine - Robert Wyatt, Canterbury Prog Rock. However i prefer his albums as Matching Mole. Organ, Mellotron were used on the 1st album of the same name and (Synth on Matching Mole's Little Red Record).

Matching Mole in french is Machine Molle which translated as Soft Machine (a pun on his old band name).
| syn303.bandcamp.com | soundcloud.com/syn303 |

Post Reply