functionality vs sound ....
Forum rules
READ: VSE Board-Wide Rules and Guidelines
READ: VSE Board-Wide Rules and Guidelines
-
KBD_TRACKER
- Junior Member

- Posts:222
- Joined:Sun Oct 15, 2006 11:10 am
Suppose you landed on a deserted island with some solar panels and some active speakers. and you had a choice between an alesis micron and a moog, say little phatty.
Those two have very little in common: the micron is feature -laden (polyphony, multitimbrality, 2 sequencers, massive modulation matrix, many filters emulated, tons of LFOs and oscillators, drum sounds, etc.), BUT it has that VA sound ....
On the other hand, the little phatty has much much fewer functions, BUT it has that Moog analog sound (and filter) ...
Let's also assume that these 2 are comparable in durability for "deserted island usage" (so that the choice lays only on functionality vs sound).
Which one would you choose, knowing that it will end up being you sole instrument for many years on this deserted island ???
Those two have very little in common: the micron is feature -laden (polyphony, multitimbrality, 2 sequencers, massive modulation matrix, many filters emulated, tons of LFOs and oscillators, drum sounds, etc.), BUT it has that VA sound ....
On the other hand, the little phatty has much much fewer functions, BUT it has that Moog analog sound (and filter) ...
Let's also assume that these 2 are comparable in durability for "deserted island usage" (so that the choice lays only on functionality vs sound).
Which one would you choose, knowing that it will end up being you sole instrument for many years on this deserted island ???
- cornutt
- Moderator

- Posts:2119
- Joined:Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:03 am
- Gear:6th
- Location:Rocket City USA
- Contact:
Re: functionality vs sound ....
I'd go with the Little Phatty, but I'm not a big fan of VAs in general. If the choices were between the Little Phatty and, say, a V-Synth, the answer might be different.
Switches, knobs, buttons, LEDs, LCD screens, monitors, keys, mice, jacks, sockets. Now two joysticks!
Re: functionality vs sound ....
I would always choose the sound over anything.
Roland Vp330 mk1.SH101.juno 6.OSCar.ARP odyssey..Tonus 2600..omni.
ms20/50. OBX.
Prophet 5
Wasp.EMS AKS.
ms20/50. OBX.
Prophet 5
Wasp.EMS AKS.
- meatballfulton
- Moderator

- Posts:6312
- Joined:Wed Apr 13, 2005 9:29 pm
- Gear:Logic Pro X
Ableton Live
Nektar Panorama P6
Launchpad X
MOTU M2 interface
Re: functionality vs sound ....
Between a Micron and Little Phatty I'd be in serious trouble 
I listened to Hatfield and the North at Rainbow. They were very wonderful and they made my heart a prisoner.
-
tomorrowstops
- Supporting Member!

- Posts:1009
- Joined:Mon Jan 25, 2010 2:55 pm
- Location:Portland, ME
Re: functionality vs sound ....
Well, you're stuck on a deserted island, so you don't have to worry about pleasing/impressing the rest of the world, so forget the Moog legacy (and the boring blandness its turned into) and go with the more fun device....
Oh wait, you can do that in the real world too....
Oh wait, you can do that in the real world too....
- griffin avid
- Synth Explorer

- Posts:1568
- Joined:Fri Mar 25, 2005 11:08 am
- Location:New York
- Contact:
Re: functionality vs sound ....
Seems like a very simple choice for me. I'd be using whatever had the widest range of sounds to complete a full song.
I'd take the micron (not that I've ever owned one) since I should be able to make full pieces of music. I think doing solos would get tired after a while no matter how sweet the singular patch.....
Now maybe a piano ....would be different....or any ROMpler.......
And you know the piano joke about building a raft...
I'd take the micron (not that I've ever owned one) since I should be able to make full pieces of music. I think doing solos would get tired after a while no matter how sweet the singular patch.....
Now maybe a piano ....would be different....or any ROMpler.......
And you know the piano joke about building a raft...
Music Product: Better Sounds for Beats http://www.StudioAVX.com
Music Production: Resources and Research http://www.ProducersEdgeMagazine.com
Music Produced: Abstract Hip Hop Sci-Fi: http://www.TheDynamicUniverse.com
Music Production: Resources and Research http://www.ProducersEdgeMagazine.com
Music Produced: Abstract Hip Hop Sci-Fi: http://www.TheDynamicUniverse.com
Re: functionality vs sound ....
On a desert island I would take the Micron over ANY monosynth. My music is mostly song based, so polyphony is pretty much essential for me.
If you take polyphony out of the equation, then I'd probably go with sound over features (I might even take a nice Rhodes over a synth given the choice
).
If you take polyphony out of the equation, then I'd probably go with sound over features (I might even take a nice Rhodes over a synth given the choice
- Percivale
- Junior Member

- Posts:227
- Joined:Mon Sep 09, 2013 1:56 am
- Gear:Blofeld, Juno-106, AN1X, MB-6582/SEQ V4, etc
- Location:SG Synthesizers Group
- Contact:
Re: functionality vs sound ....
Desert Island Scenario - get Poly over Mono.
Join - SG Synthesizers Group
- Black Tomorrow
- Active Member

- Posts:371
- Joined:Sat Apr 15, 2006 7:52 am
- Real name:kp Catalano
- Gear:MG-1, Minilogue, Minibrute 2, V-Synth w/ VC1, Poly800, PSR740, Triton, SHS10, Stylophone, various random instruments, several VSTs.
- Location:North Carolina
- Contact:
Re: functionality vs sound ....
LP hands down. There's still enough functionality, and despite not being strictly knob per function, it's still easy to navigate.
If you had said Ion or LP, that would be different. Funstionality vs. sound is a big factor to consider, but so is user interface.
If you had said Ion or LP, that would be different. Funstionality vs. sound is a big factor to consider, but so is user interface.
You can't synthesize love
- Cybercardinal
- Supporting Member!

- Posts:482
- Joined:Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:16 pm
- Location:Denmark
Re: functionality vs sound ....
Lately I've come to realise how much I like a few notes with a (rather) simple patch on a great sounding instrument with good FX. (But then again lately I 've been listening to a lot of early 80's stuff).
I think many would pick sound. Isn't that part of the explanation why prices on vintage synths has skyrocketed?
I think many would pick sound. Isn't that part of the explanation why prices on vintage synths has skyrocketed?
Re: functionality vs sound ....
I'd definately go for the Micron - more features and functionality to keep me occupied
- griffin avid
- Synth Explorer

- Posts:1568
- Joined:Fri Mar 25, 2005 11:08 am
- Location:New York
- Contact:
Re: functionality vs sound ....
I think many would pick sound....
It's a skewed question, but not slanted enough for a truly A ORRRRRR B type choice.
The Micron doesn't sound bad so it's not like there's some HUUUGGGEEEEE disparity between the two.
Even if you went chip tune verse total-bad-azz-synthie-beast, there'd be some that prefer the chippy tone....
I have a Moog Voyager and as much as I love it, I'd rather have my KORG Kaossilator Pro with me if I had to only have 1 piece to make music with.
It's a skewed question, but not slanted enough for a truly A ORRRRRR B type choice.
The Micron doesn't sound bad so it's not like there's some HUUUGGGEEEEE disparity between the two.
Even if you went chip tune verse total-bad-azz-synthie-beast, there'd be some that prefer the chippy tone....
I have a Moog Voyager and as much as I love it, I'd rather have my KORG Kaossilator Pro with me if I had to only have 1 piece to make music with.
Music Product: Better Sounds for Beats http://www.StudioAVX.com
Music Production: Resources and Research http://www.ProducersEdgeMagazine.com
Music Produced: Abstract Hip Hop Sci-Fi: http://www.TheDynamicUniverse.com
Music Production: Resources and Research http://www.ProducersEdgeMagazine.com
Music Produced: Abstract Hip Hop Sci-Fi: http://www.TheDynamicUniverse.com
Re: functionality vs sound ....
Very good points, and exactly what I'm thinking. I'd rather have a Yamaha rm1x on the island, than a Little Phattygriffin avid wrote:I think many would pick sound....
It's a skewed question, but not slanted enough for a truly A ORRRRRR B type choice.
The Micron doesn't sound bad so it's not like there's some HUUUGGGEEEEE disparity between the two.
Even if you went chip tune verse total-bad-azz-synthie-beast, there'd be some that prefer the chippy tone....
I have a Moog Voyager and as much as I love it, I'd rather have my KORG Kaossilator Pro with me if I had to only have 1 piece to make music with.
- Psy_Free
- Supporting Member!

- Posts:820
- Joined:Thu Aug 17, 2006 6:36 pm
- Gear:Synths 'n' stuff.
- Band:Klangzeit
- Location:UK
- Contact:
Re: functionality vs sound ....
I'd probably pick the Micron not only for the functionality/sound palette but because I'd rather have a poly than a mono to wile away the years of isolation (leads & bass would get a bit stale after a while).
- Bitexion
- Synth Explorer

- Posts:4230
- Joined:Fri Apr 15, 2005 7:43 pm
- Gear:Alesis Andromeda A6
Roland D-50
Creamware Minimax
Yamaha DX7s
Analogue Systems modular
Ensoniq SQ-80
Waldorf Blofeld - Location:Drammen, Norway
Re: functionality vs sound ....
I'd always pick poly over monosynth. I like playing chords. Not just "phat basslines and screamy leads".
And if you're all alone on this island anyway, there will be no hipsters to show off your phat moog lines to anyway who could say "whoaaa that's so anaaaaaaaalogue duude luuuv it can't beat it"
And if you're all alone on this island anyway, there will be no hipsters to show off your phat moog lines to anyway who could say "whoaaa that's so anaaaaaaaalogue duude luuuv it can't beat it"


