Page 10 of 24
Re: Moog Sub 37, finaly a new poliphonic Moog?
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:25 pm
by Jabberwalky
I thought it was Duophonic.
Re: Moog Sub 37, finaly a new poliphonic Moog?
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:41 pm
by nathanscribe
I thought this was a thread, not a Möbius strip.
Re: Moog Sub 37, finaly a new poliphonic Moog?
Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 1:08 am
by monolith
nathanscribe wrote:I thought this was a thread, not a Möbius strip.

Re: Moog Sub 37, finaly a new poliphonic Moog?
Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 1:27 am
by Stab Frenzy
Perhaps the misleading thread title could be changed.
Re: Moog Sub 37, finaly a new poliphonic Moog?
Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 4:12 am
by Kenneth
Stab Frenzy wrote:Perhaps the misleading thread title could be changed.
I said something about that a while ago, to no avail. Let's try and run it through spell check at the very least.

Re: Moog Sub 37
Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 4:18 am
by Stab Frenzy
Sometimes if you want something done properly...
Re: Moog Sub 37
Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 5:15 am
by monolith
Uncle Stabbers to the rescue
Re: Moog Sub 37
Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 5:19 am
by silikon
Page 1, wankers.
(Admittedly, I had hoped it would stick...)
Page 1 spellcheck
Re: Moog Sub 37
Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 2:23 pm
by Sir Nose
It looks like they really got it right this time. It will be a while for me, but in 3-5 years, who knows. Hopefully, Moog will come out with a poly around then and folks will be dumping these cheap.
Re: Moog Sub 37
Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 11:39 pm
by moremagic
Why is this thing only 37 keys? the voyagers still got 44, right? and duophony would make more keys more interesting
Re: Moog Sub 37
Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2014 12:57 am
by monolith
THE SUB-37 IS GREAT SYNTH BUT NOT AS FAT AS A CS-10
-JOE
Re: Moog Sub 37, finaly a new poliphonic Moog?
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2014 3:40 am
by Automatic Gainsay
smcumber wrote:That's "polyphonic" in the classical music sense. "Polyphonic" when referring to synthesizers means each voice runs through a separate envelope and filter, instead of sharing one. Both of these voices have the ability to have independent pitches but share the same envelope/filter, so it is paraphonic.
I'm sorry, but no.
"Polyphonic" in regard to synthesizers means multiple voices, and that's the end of it.
What you're talking about is our desire for each voice to have individual articulation... which is a different matter.
The term "paraphonic" applies to monophonic synthesizers, too.
[Keeping in mind, as CZ Rider pointed out, that originally "paraphonic" was a word created by Roland to describe synthesizers with multiple overlapping sections]
Re: Moog Sub 37
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2014 4:44 am
by Kenneth
Let's count the number of times we have to go over the definitions of "polyphonic" and "paraphonic" for someone who missed it the first time. I'm at 247.
Re: Moog Sub 37
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2014 5:29 am
by Stab Frenzy
Maybe instead of writing 'paraphonic' on it they should have written 'monophonic with a cool split osc trick'. I guess maybe that wouldn't fit on the panel.
Re: Moog Sub 37
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2014 5:31 am
by Dr. Phibes
I would need to hear it in the flesh to starts GASing. So far, for all the features it's overall tone is leaving me cold .