Simple "waveshape-core" question

Discussions about anything analog, digital, MIDI, synth technology, techniques, theories and more.
Grumblepig
Newbie
Newbie
Posts:83
Joined:Wed Jan 26, 2011 3:18 pm
Gear:Prophet 5 and a bunch of other fab things that aren't a Prophet 5...
Band:The Maude Squad
Location:Farm
Contact:
Simple "waveshape-core" question

Post by Grumblepig » Mon Dec 12, 2016 2:45 am

What does it mean when an osc is described as "triangle-core?" The original Doepfer Dark Energy contains such. The DE II has a "sawtooth core" osc.
Cheers!
"Cerebral, memorable, melodic but also adventurous and inventive." - Monolith Cocktail

User avatar
Yekuku
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts:818
Joined:Tue Nov 18, 2008 11:29 am
Gear:dk'tronics speech synthesizer :P
Location:Greece

Re: Simple "waveshape-core" question

Post by Yekuku » Tue Dec 13, 2016 9:20 am

It means that the first waveform that the oscillator circuit produces is a triangle. All other waveforms ( saw , pulse etc) are produced by waveshaping the triangle.
It is all about sharing...

User avatar
cornutt
Moderator
Moderator
Posts:2119
Joined:Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:03 am
Gear:6th
Location:Rocket City USA
Contact:

Re: Simple "waveshape-core" question

Post by cornutt » Tue Dec 13, 2016 9:49 pm

To add a bit to that: Most VCOs use a sawtooth core circuit. Other circuitry takes the sawtooth wave output by the core and transforms it into whatever other waveforms the VCO produces. Triangle core VCOs are said to have certain advantages in terms of waveform accuracy, but they are more difficult to design properly and require more components to implement, so they aren't used as often.
Switches, knobs, buttons, LEDs, LCD screens, monitors, keys, mice, jacks, sockets. Now two joysticks!

Grumblepig
Newbie
Newbie
Posts:83
Joined:Wed Jan 26, 2011 3:18 pm
Gear:Prophet 5 and a bunch of other fab things that aren't a Prophet 5...
Band:The Maude Squad
Location:Farm
Contact:

Re: Simple "waveshape-core" question

Post by Grumblepig » Tue Dec 13, 2016 10:55 pm

Curious! Thanks for the replies. Is there a discernible difference in tone between the different types of oscs?
"Cerebral, memorable, melodic but also adventurous and inventive." - Monolith Cocktail

User avatar
Broadwave
Active Member
Active Member
Posts:416
Joined:Wed Sep 14, 2011 10:50 am
Gear:Kronos 2-88, Fantom 6, Novation Summit, ASM Hydrasynth, Modal Cobalt8, Behringer Odyssey, Behringer Poly D, BroadWAVE ARP 2600EX.
Location:Manchester UK
Contact:

Re: Simple "waveshape-core" question

Post by Broadwave » Wed Dec 14, 2016 8:09 am

Grumblepig wrote:Curious! Thanks for the replies. Is there a discernible difference in tone between the different types of oscs?
Not enough to worry about, although I'm sure some purists here would have something to say about that ;)

Once you start looking at waveforms with a 'scope, you'll notice that Saw/Tri/Square waves are all slightly different when comparing synth manufacturers, but even this varies at different frequencies, so it's not a constant factor.

Another example is that, due to the design of the pulse voltage divider circuitry (5% resistors with no adjustment), the square waves on a Minimoog will NEVER be exactly 50% (more like 48% - It can easily be corrected, but you loose the character), whereas ARP, Roland etc have trimmers to produce an exact 50% duty.

What counts is the end result, not the source waveforms. The Minimoog design unintentionally introduces crosstalk between the VCOs, distortion in the VCF & VCA - all this adds up to produce "that" sound. An ARP 2600 has a much cleaner signal path with far less crosstalk & distortion so it has a totally different character from the MM.
Last edited by Broadwave on Wed Dec 14, 2016 8:34 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Bitexion
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
Posts:4230
Joined:Fri Apr 15, 2005 7:43 pm
Gear:Alesis Andromeda A6
Roland D-50
Creamware Minimax
Yamaha DX7s
Analogue Systems modular
Ensoniq SQ-80
Waldorf Blofeld
Location:Drammen, Norway

Re: Simple "waveshape-core" question

Post by Bitexion » Wed Dec 14, 2016 8:28 am

I wonder why they left out PWM on the Minimoog.

User avatar
Broadwave
Active Member
Active Member
Posts:416
Joined:Wed Sep 14, 2011 10:50 am
Gear:Kronos 2-88, Fantom 6, Novation Summit, ASM Hydrasynth, Modal Cobalt8, Behringer Odyssey, Behringer Poly D, BroadWAVE ARP 2600EX.
Location:Manchester UK
Contact:

Re: Simple "waveshape-core" question

Post by Broadwave » Wed Dec 14, 2016 8:42 am

Bitexion wrote:I wonder why they left out PWM on the Minimoog.
I presume, at the time, Moog were going for simplicity - Which sort of worked ;)

PWM can be added to the MM's VCOs, but you'll have to put those extra knobs and switches somewhere - I've done mods in the past which use a break-out box and ribbon cable, as it was the most elegant solution I could think of without drilling holes all over the front panel :shock:

User avatar
commodorejohn
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
Posts:1608
Joined:Mon Aug 12, 2013 2:39 am
Real name:John
Gear:Roland JX-10/SH-09/MT-32/D-50, Yamaha DX7-II/V50/TX7/TG33/FB-01, Korg MS-20 Mini/ARP Odyssey/DW-8000/X5DR, Ensoniq SQ-80, Oberheim SEM
Location:Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Re: Simple "waveshape-core" question

Post by commodorejohn » Wed Dec 14, 2016 9:25 am

I'm kinda curious to hear what that would sound like, as the Minimoog's square/pulse is so distinctive.
Computers: Amiga 1200, DEC VAXStation 4000/60, DEC MicroPDP-11/73

User avatar
pflosi
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
Posts:3620
Joined:Tue Nov 13, 2007 6:14 pm
Gear:more than 150 characters...
Location:zürich
Contact:

Re: Simple "waveshape-core" question

Post by pflosi » Wed Dec 14, 2016 6:21 pm

I'm guessing the reason is that the 901 also did not have a CV in for the PW. The 921 that does have it was released after the Model D. AG will come along soon and school us how PWM is not "real" synthesis and just there to "fake" two osc sounds - the Model D has three oscs, so no need for PWM according to that theory :mrgreen: Sorry Marc :thumbright:

WRT triangle core, some triangle core oscs in modular land only have a strange sort of "reversing" soft sync, which sounds kinda fun but can be a real pain for synced LFO applications... I guess hard sync is trickier with a tri core? Not entirely sure... Apparently, sine waves are easier to get clean with a tri core (although all Cwejman is saw core and those are the cleanest sines I know), which is somewhat essential for FM. AFAIK, the thru zero FM designs are also all based on tri core oscs.

Cheers :drinks:

User avatar
madtheory
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
Posts:5646
Joined:Mon May 01, 2006 12:45 pm
Real name:Tomas Mulcahy
Gear:Wurlitzer Opus 1536, Model F, Morovdis Arpeggiator, Maplin My First EQ, Jeff Wayne Thunderchild rack, Thermostat, Buck Owens' Moog.
Location:Cork, Ireland
Contact:

Re: Simple "waveshape-core" question

Post by madtheory » Wed Dec 14, 2016 6:34 pm

Maybe MuffWiggler is the place for this kind of, very interesting, debate?

Ya Mark's wrong though. Maybe PWM with an LFO is mostly used to fake a chorusing effect, but being able to adjust the pulse width to change the waveshape is incredibly useful. But that is rarely found on its own, because it is a simple step in most circuits to allow the shape to me LFO modulated.

I really hope there's a debate :)

User avatar
pflosi
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
Posts:3620
Joined:Tue Nov 13, 2007 6:14 pm
Gear:more than 150 characters...
Location:zürich
Contact:

Re: Simple "waveshape-core" question

Post by pflosi » Wed Dec 14, 2016 6:43 pm

Interestingly, there is a PW control on the 901 - just no CV in.

User avatar
madtheory
Supporting Member!
Supporting Member!
Posts:5646
Joined:Mon May 01, 2006 12:45 pm
Real name:Tomas Mulcahy
Gear:Wurlitzer Opus 1536, Model F, Morovdis Arpeggiator, Maplin My First EQ, Jeff Wayne Thunderchild rack, Thermostat, Buck Owens' Moog.
Location:Cork, Ireland
Contact:

Re: Simple "waveshape-core" question

Post by madtheory » Thu Dec 15, 2016 12:24 am

Interesting, I did not know that. But hang on, 901 is discrete transistors whereas MIniMoog has 741s instead, so they're not exactly the same are they?

User avatar
Broadwave
Active Member
Active Member
Posts:416
Joined:Wed Sep 14, 2011 10:50 am
Gear:Kronos 2-88, Fantom 6, Novation Summit, ASM Hydrasynth, Modal Cobalt8, Behringer Odyssey, Behringer Poly D, BroadWAVE ARP 2600EX.
Location:Manchester UK
Contact:

Re: Simple "waveshape-core" question

Post by Broadwave » Thu Dec 15, 2016 8:00 am

madtheory wrote:Ya Mark's wrong though.
Oh boy, you're in trouble now :lol:

I didn't know Mr. Doty was so hung up about PWM. Modulating PW with envelopes, S&H and even Keyboard CV is vital to me - It's not all about the LFO ;)

User avatar
pflosi
Synth Explorer
Synth Explorer
Posts:3620
Joined:Tue Nov 13, 2007 6:14 pm
Gear:more than 150 characters...
Location:zürich
Contact:

Re: Simple "waveshape-core" question

Post by pflosi » Thu Dec 15, 2016 1:06 pm

Yeah the Mini oscs are not exactly like the 901. But definitely based on it.

A 901 modded for PWM can be heard here: https://soundcloud.com/q-uazimodo02/mod ... ulse-width

User avatar
meatballfulton
Moderator
Moderator
Posts:6312
Joined:Wed Apr 13, 2005 9:29 pm
Gear:Logic Pro X
Ableton Live
Nektar Panorama P6
Launchpad X
MOTU M2 interface

Re: Simple "waveshape-core" question

Post by meatballfulton » Thu Dec 15, 2016 3:40 pm

Broadwave wrote:I didn't know Mr. Doty was so hung up about PWM
This is an unsubstantiated rumor...
I listened to Hatfield and the North at Rainbow. They were very wonderful and they made my heart a prisoner.

Post Reply