Getting that full sound
Forum rules
READ: Please Read the Rules of Sound Production.
READ: Please Read the Rules of Sound Production.
- factual35
- Junior Member

- Posts:213
- Joined:Mon May 28, 2007 12:02 am
- Gear:Korg EA-1,Korg ES-1, Korg Monotron, Alesis Micron, DSI Evolver Desktop
- Band:Mike Rochip
- Location:Edge of Civilization in Georgia, USA
- Contact:
OK I have good equipment, and the main difference I hear between my music and pro music is "fullness". Professional music sounds very full, and there can be just one instrument playing and it still sounds awesome. What's creating that sound? Is it compression? If so what affordable hardware or software compressors would be good finished mixes?
- shaft9000
- Supporting Member!

- Posts:2046
- Joined:Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:13 am
- Real name:Dave
- Gear:Whips chains and a contract.
- Location:VanNuys, CA USA
- Contact:
Re: Getting that full sound
- invest in quality monitors
- acoustic treatment
- layering (here's your technique -it may be one sound but that doesn't mean it's only one instrument)
- careful EQ
- monitoring on a variety of systems
-compression has little to do with it, and you're apt to turn mixes to shite until you learn the other things 1st; i know i have many times
- acoustic treatment
- layering (here's your technique -it may be one sound but that doesn't mean it's only one instrument)
- careful EQ
- monitoring on a variety of systems
-compression has little to do with it, and you're apt to turn mixes to shite until you learn the other things 1st; i know i have many times
2600.solus.modcan a.eurorack.CS60.JP-8.JU-6.OB-Xa (6v).A6.sunsyn.JD-990.TB-303.x0xb0x.revolution.
.svc350.memotron
youtube.com/shaft9000 <- various synth demos and studies
.svc350.memotron
youtube.com/shaft9000 <- various synth demos and studies
-
GeneralBigbag
- Senior Member

- Posts:852
- Joined:Thu Jan 19, 2006 10:16 pm
- Location:Grad school
Re: Getting that full sound
+100000shaft9000 wrote:- invest in quality monitors
- acoustic treatment
- careful EQ
- monitoring on a variety of systems
If you can't hear what your recordings sound like, it's very hard to figure out what's wrong with them. Look into what you can do to improve the acoustics of the space you work in, get good monitors, if you have the money, get good DA converters, and then learn how EQ works when you can really hear what it does.
virb.com/ookpikk
- Stab Frenzy
- Moderator

- Posts:9723
- Joined:Tue Jun 06, 2006 5:41 pm
- Gear:Eurorack, RYTM, Ultranova, many FX
- Location:monster island*
- Contact:
Re: Getting that full sound
The difference is that they've been mixed by somebody who knows what they're doing. You don't just buy good gear and expect the result to come out better, you need to know how to use it.
-
nvbrkr
- Senior Member

- Posts:812
- Joined:Fri May 09, 2008 8:14 pm
- Gear:An electric piano and analog synths.
- Location:Helsinki, Finland
Re: Getting that full sound
+
- High frequency / low frequency separation
- If excessive amounts of bass is used, use it only at certain intervals. Don't expect a constant droning sound being employed to provide the impression of "fullness"
- The Composition and arrangment matter as well - a lot of the "fullness" you'd associate as being the property of the overall sound have often a lot to do with the way the different instruments interact with each other and fill up the sonic spectrum one after another in different ways.
A good track to listen to and learn in that regard would be, say, Michael Jackson's "Baby Be Mine" from Thriller. Listen to the way the various instruments interplay with each other and emphasize their own frequency ranges one after another. There's nothing bombastic about that track, nor are there thick layers of chords /pads employed really - but the song itself has a very full sound all throughout it. The best way to ensure that your mixes will sound lifeless is to employ the typical multi-layered, distorted electric guitar parts playing chords non-stop and leaving absolutely no space for the rest of the mix to breathe. Couple up that with hard-driving drums and the bass underneath being too busy in general and it all just works against itself.
Oh yeah, and...
Analog synths.
- High frequency / low frequency separation
- If excessive amounts of bass is used, use it only at certain intervals. Don't expect a constant droning sound being employed to provide the impression of "fullness"
- The Composition and arrangment matter as well - a lot of the "fullness" you'd associate as being the property of the overall sound have often a lot to do with the way the different instruments interact with each other and fill up the sonic spectrum one after another in different ways.
A good track to listen to and learn in that regard would be, say, Michael Jackson's "Baby Be Mine" from Thriller. Listen to the way the various instruments interplay with each other and emphasize their own frequency ranges one after another. There's nothing bombastic about that track, nor are there thick layers of chords /pads employed really - but the song itself has a very full sound all throughout it. The best way to ensure that your mixes will sound lifeless is to employ the typical multi-layered, distorted electric guitar parts playing chords non-stop and leaving absolutely no space for the rest of the mix to breathe. Couple up that with hard-driving drums and the bass underneath being too busy in general and it all just works against itself.
Oh yeah, and...
Analog synths.
- th0mas
- Expert Member

- Posts:1349
- Joined:Thu Jul 14, 2005 5:27 pm
- Gear:oakley tm3030/mopho keys/midibox sid/tr-707/tama techstars/monotron
- Band:GRAVITRONIC
- Location:Ontario
- Contact:
Re: Getting that full sound
get a mastering VST, set it to a preset and turn "loudness" to 10, and "shine" to taste.
-
nvbrkr
- Senior Member

- Posts:812
- Joined:Fri May 09, 2008 8:14 pm
- Gear:An electric piano and analog synths.
- Location:Helsinki, Finland
Re: Getting that full sound
Well, yeah. I guess that one too.
If none of the hard work proposed above sounds like an attractive option, multiband compress the s**t out of it and remove most of the mids anyway. Won't please the purist ears, but might give you quickly results you can use for uploading your tracks to the internet, or something. Also, use more reverb than it would be considered tasteful by any kind of professional standards.
If none of the hard work proposed above sounds like an attractive option, multiband compress the s**t out of it and remove most of the mids anyway. Won't please the purist ears, but might give you quickly results you can use for uploading your tracks to the internet, or something. Also, use more reverb than it would be considered tasteful by any kind of professional standards.
Re: Getting that full sound
I agree with what the other guys said.
One big factor that people fail to mention though, is that not everyone mixes the same way. You can take the same instrument and have different people to use it in their songs, but for each producer the sound may vary because of how it's EQed, the type of compression used, volume, etc. All of that depends on how you want your overall sound - Considering IF you have a set standard for your productions.
It's important to know that in a mix, each instrument has it's own dynamic range, so you have to know the sonic character of the instrument, and KNOW THE MIX in order to fit everything properly. You get a more lush, clear, and full sound when each sound is transparent.
Now, let's suppose you have everything EQed properly and all of the sounds in your mix shine through clearly, but the overall sound is still not "Full" like you want it. Sometimes just boosting certain frequencies on the master EQ is what you need to bring fullness into the overall mix. It just depends on the way you want it to sound. Certain analog hardware and effects can contribute to a full sound too, but again, that depends on the way you want it to sound.
EDIT - IMO, what could help is if you had a favorite producer who you like to model your sound after. If his/her productions have a consistent overall sound that you like, you could try to emulate how everything is mixed to get a good idea where to start. That's what helped me get started. Before that, my mixes were flat sounding and varied because I didnt' have a standard, but once I set my standard, I knew how to make my productions more full sounding.
One big factor that people fail to mention though, is that not everyone mixes the same way. You can take the same instrument and have different people to use it in their songs, but for each producer the sound may vary because of how it's EQed, the type of compression used, volume, etc. All of that depends on how you want your overall sound - Considering IF you have a set standard for your productions.
It's important to know that in a mix, each instrument has it's own dynamic range, so you have to know the sonic character of the instrument, and KNOW THE MIX in order to fit everything properly. You get a more lush, clear, and full sound when each sound is transparent.
Now, let's suppose you have everything EQed properly and all of the sounds in your mix shine through clearly, but the overall sound is still not "Full" like you want it. Sometimes just boosting certain frequencies on the master EQ is what you need to bring fullness into the overall mix. It just depends on the way you want it to sound. Certain analog hardware and effects can contribute to a full sound too, but again, that depends on the way you want it to sound.
EDIT - IMO, what could help is if you had a favorite producer who you like to model your sound after. If his/her productions have a consistent overall sound that you like, you could try to emulate how everything is mixed to get a good idea where to start. That's what helped me get started. Before that, my mixes were flat sounding and varied because I didnt' have a standard, but once I set my standard, I knew how to make my productions more full sounding.
- Stab Frenzy
- Moderator

- Posts:9723
- Joined:Tue Jun 06, 2006 5:41 pm
- Gear:Eurorack, RYTM, Ultranova, many FX
- Location:monster island*
- Contact:
Re: Getting that full sound
Worst advice ever.th0mas wrote:get a mastering VST, set it to a preset and turn "loudness" to 10, and "shine" to taste.
- tekkentool
- Synth Explorer

- Posts:3218
- Joined:Fri Jun 26, 2009 10:51 am
- Real name:Steve
- Gear:Lasers (ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ ωส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้)
- Band:none currently
- Location:Sydney, australia.(I moved)
Re: Getting that full sound
duh, sarcasm much?Stab Frenzy wrote:Worst advice ever.th0mas wrote:get a mastering VST, set it to a preset and turn "loudness" to 10, and "shine" to taste.
- th0mas
- Expert Member

- Posts:1349
- Joined:Thu Jul 14, 2005 5:27 pm
- Gear:oakley tm3030/mopho keys/midibox sid/tr-707/tama techstars/monotron
- Band:GRAVITRONIC
- Location:Ontario
- Contact:
Re: Getting that full sound
it's what (I'm going to fathom a guess that) most amateurs do anywaysStab Frenzy wrote:Worst advice ever.th0mas wrote:get a mastering VST, set it to a preset and turn "loudness" to 10, and "shine" to taste.
http://www.xtranormal.com/watch/2868571/
-
Scories
- Active Member

- Posts:617
- Joined:Sun Sep 16, 2007 8:57 pm
- Gear:Micromoog, JX-3P, Minikorg 700, Z1
- Location:Québec - CANADA
- Contact:
Re: Getting that full sound
I'd rather send my masters to a good professionnal mastering studio than trying to do it all by myself. They'll run your music though a 30K setup you don't want to buy.
Otherwise, using quality fx, mixers and recorders.. and sending hours trimming volumes and adding subtle EQ's will definitely help. Avoid compression when not necessary.
Otherwise, using quality fx, mixers and recorders.. and sending hours trimming volumes and adding subtle EQ's will definitely help. Avoid compression when not necessary.
- Stab Frenzy
- Moderator

- Posts:9723
- Joined:Tue Jun 06, 2006 5:41 pm
- Gear:Eurorack, RYTM, Ultranova, many FX
- Location:monster island*
- Contact:
Re: Getting that full sound
How is recommending that someone do the same thing as people who don't know what they're doing good advice?th0mas wrote:it's what (I'm going to fathom a guess that) most amateurs do anywaysStab Frenzy wrote:Worst advice ever.th0mas wrote:get a mastering VST, set it to a preset and turn "loudness" to 10, and "shine" to taste.
http://www.xtranormal.com/watch/2868571/
- tekkentool
- Synth Explorer

- Posts:3218
- Joined:Fri Jun 26, 2009 10:51 am
- Real name:Steve
- Gear:Lasers (ส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้ ωส้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้้)
- Band:none currently
- Location:Sydney, australia.(I moved)
Re: Getting that full sound
srs mod r srsStab Frenzy wrote: How is recommending that someone do the same thing as people who don't know what they're doing good advice?
- tallowwaters
- Moderator

- Posts:4998
- Joined:Thu Aug 25, 2005 4:11 am
- Gear:LC-MS/MS
- Location:snake's belly in a wagon rut
Re: Getting that full sound
No, he has a good point, and I couldn't really detect any sarcasm there, and I doubt someone that doesn't know that is terrible advice would know it is sarcasm.tekkentool wrote:srs mod r srsStab Frenzy wrote: How is recommending that someone do the same thing as people who don't know what they're doing good advice?
I can tell you that your smart a*s attitude is pretty unwelcome...
Brains can be used like a "stress ball," but only once.
