Reason, Renoise, Fruity Loops or other?
Forum rules
READ: Please Read the Rules of Sound Production.
READ: Please Read the Rules of Sound Production.
- vcs3
- Supporting Member!

- Posts: 342
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:22 am
- Gear: BitOne,DX7II, M-1000, ESQm, Procussion, NanoSynth, VL1, P2500, K5000R, FS1r, JX-3P, Ju-60,HR-16, CZ1000, RX-5,K2600S, Nord G1r, G2, XL-7, Shuthri-1
- Location: Lusitania
Reason, Renoise, Fruity Loops or other?
I'm buying a sequencer for Windows, but if it will work on Mac it will great.
Since my setup is 100% hardware it as to control very well MIDI devices, of course
I need to record to harddisk.
A vertical piano roll will be great.
Thank you in advance for your help
Since my setup is 100% hardware it as to control very well MIDI devices, of course
I need to record to harddisk.
A vertical piano roll will be great.
Thank you in advance for your help
- nuketifromorbit
- Expert Member

- Posts: 1346
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:07 am
Re: Reason, Renoise, Fruity Loops or other?
Renoise lacks a piano roll reditor. That being said its pretty much ruined hardware sequencing and sampling for me.vcs3 wrote:I'm buying a sequencer for Windows, but if it will work on Mac it will great.
Since my setup is 100% hardware it as to control very well MIDI devices, of course
I need to record to harddisk.
A vertical piano roll will be great.
Thank you in advance for your help
We'll always be remembered, we'll always be dismembered.
- optimus prime
- Active Member

- Posts: 478
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 12:33 am
- Gear: Alesis MMT8, Casio CZ-101, Korg ER-1 mkII, Korg Poly-800, Roland D-20, Roland TR-626, Yamaha DX-100, Yamaha SU-10
- Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Re: Reason, Renoise, Fruity Loops or other?
Maybe Renoise's tracker sequencing interface is what he's after?nuketifromorbit wrote:Renoise lacks a piano roll reditor.vcs3 wrote:A vertical piano roll will be great.
Concerning Reason as an option, its MIDI capabilities are rather limited, basic even.
There are demos available of all products you mentioned, maybe you could try them all and see what gels best?
- vcs3
- Supporting Member!

- Posts: 342
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:22 am
- Gear: BitOne,DX7II, M-1000, ESQm, Procussion, NanoSynth, VL1, P2500, K5000R, FS1r, JX-3P, Ju-60,HR-16, CZ1000, RX-5,K2600S, Nord G1r, G2, XL-7, Shuthri-1
- Location: Lusitania
Re: Reason, Renoise, Fruity Loops or other?
Hi guys,
thank you for your replays.
I was temped to go to Reason but since optimus prime says the the MIDI capabilities are basic, I
will reconsider.
In this moment I'm evaluating all the software.
thank you for your replays.
I was temped to go to Reason but since optimus prime says the the MIDI capabilities are basic, I
will reconsider.
In this moment I'm evaluating all the software.
Re: Reason, Renoise, Fruity Loops or other?
How about Ableton Live? There may still be some strange solutions MIDI wise present in Live, but for me it's worked great
- meatballfulton
- Moderator

- Posts: 6310
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 9:29 pm
- Gear: Logic Pro X
Re: Reason, Renoise, Fruity Loops or other?
If you want great MIDI control of hardware you want either Cubase or Sonar, because both evolved from MIDI sequencing programs of the late 80s.
I listened to Hatfield and the North at Rainbow. They were very wonderful and they made my heart a prisoner.
- piRoN
- Active Member

- Posts: 541
- Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 7:04 am
- Gear: A fair bit.
- Location: The crotch of The Lucky Country
Re: Reason, Renoise, Fruity Loops or other?
Also remember that MOTU Digital Performer is now Windows-compatible too, and has a similar MIDI-focussed history.
I've been trialing it on Win7 and it's been working very well for a recent port.
I've been trialing it on Win7 and it's been working very well for a recent port.
Ensoniq EPS-m | Elby Designs ASM-2 | Yamaha TQ5 | Akai S3000XL | Akai X7000 | Novation KS-4 | SCI Prophet 2000 | Kawai K1m | Korg Monotribe | Korg Monotron | Roland S-50 | Roland D-10 | Roland MKS-7 | Yamaha RX11
- ryryoftokyo
- Active Member

- Posts: 650
- Joined: Sat May 05, 2007 1:19 am
- Real name: Ryan
- Gear: Metal, plastic, wood, and electricity.
- Band: Tarot Sync
- Location: Massachusetts, USA
- Contact:
Re: Reason, Renoise, Fruity Loops or other?
Ableton Live. A bit of a learning curve, but then again, all programs like that will have one. Download the demo and tool around for a while.
MU Modular (Moog, Dotcom, STG, Analog Systems, and Moon modules), MS20 (x2), Microbrute, Electribes (EA-1, EMX), microKorg, AN1x, Nord Lead 2x, Blofeld, Alpha Juno 2, DX7, JX8P, Poly 61 (x2), Split 8, TR-505, Monotron Delay, Ace Tone FR-3, Paia Fatman
- CS_TBL
- Synth Explorer

- Posts: 1677
- Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 3:47 pm
- Gear: All "In-The-Box"
Mainly FM8 - Location: NL
- Contact:
Re: Reason, Renoise, Fruity Loops or other?
For a badass tracker, go to revisit.info
See it in action here (well, action. 'replaying' it is):
It's a VST, so it runs in a DAW, controlling other VST instruments. At the same time, the communication protocol is just MIDI, so by wiring the whole shebang within the DAW you could also control your outboard synths 'n things.
See it in action here (well, action. 'replaying' it is):
It's a VST, so it runs in a DAW, controlling other VST instruments. At the same time, the communication protocol is just MIDI, so by wiring the whole shebang within the DAW you could also control your outboard synths 'n things.
"You know I love you, CS, but this is bullshit." (Automatic Gainsay)
s: VSL/FM8/EWQL/LASS h: DX7/FS1r/VL70/SY77/SN2r/JD800/JD990/XV88/Emu6400/Poly61/Amek35:12:2/genelec1030 r: Violin/AltoSax/TinWhistle c: i7-4770/RAM32GB/SSD
FM8 vids
s: VSL/FM8/EWQL/LASS h: DX7/FS1r/VL70/SY77/SN2r/JD800/JD990/XV88/Emu6400/Poly61/Amek35:12:2/genelec1030 r: Violin/AltoSax/TinWhistle c: i7-4770/RAM32GB/SSD
FM8 vids
Re: Reason, Renoise, Fruity Loops or other?
I used to sequence hw in fruityloops. It is a great sequencer, but recording sucks. Its a shame too, because I preferred the layout and workflow of it over the other daws I've tried. Fl's Edison is a joke. I sequenced in Fl on one computer, and recorded in reaper on another. It was clumsy, but now I use a hardware sequencer. Everyone disses Fl, but I will still use it for any songs featuring mostly soft synths
- Shleed
- Active Member

- Posts: 302
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:00 pm
- Real name: Ashley Dolan
- Gear: Doepfer A100
MFB Synth II
Waldorf Blofeld
Korg MS20 Mini
Ensoniq EPS-16+
TT303
TX81Z - Band: Shledge
- Location: Loughborough, UK
Re: Reason, Renoise, Fruity Loops or other?
I don't mind Edison at all, especially it's iterations in FL 10 onwards. Quite simple to use.
Out of those 3, FL Studio is best for MIDI. However, I would say Live has better overall MIDI implementation, but I prefer FL due to it's easy to use piano roll.
Out of those 3, FL Studio is best for MIDI. However, I would say Live has better overall MIDI implementation, but I prefer FL due to it's easy to use piano roll.
