Roland TB-3 opinions?
Forum rules
READ: VSE Board-Wide Rules and Guidelines
READ: VSE Board-Wide Rules and Guidelines
Roland TB-3 opinions?
I'm considering getting a TB-3 to add to my acid set up which is criminally sans 303, but I do have a Doepfer Dark energy that I trigger with my Machinedrum to get a pretty good emulation. Only problem is the sequencer on the Machinedrum is limited and doesn't have that classic 303 slide. So I guess I'm thinking either using the TB-3 as a 303 clone, or using it to trigger the Dark Energy
Arsenal: Elektron Machinedrum SPS-1,Roland JX-3P, Yamaha DX7s, Doepfer Dark Energy, Multivox String Machine, Korg DDD-1, Korg M1, Roland MKS-7, 1978 Fender Precision Bass, Upright Bass
- meatballfulton
- Moderator

- Posts: 6310
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 9:29 pm
- Gear: Logic Pro X
Re: Roland TB-3 opinions?
Slide is always a function of the receiving instrument.
Slides requires the sequencer to send a tied note and the receiving instrument to support portamento for tied notes.
If you are not going to use the TB3 for it's sounds, pretty much any sequencer will do the job...just not a drum machine!
Slides requires the sequencer to send a tied note and the receiving instrument to support portamento for tied notes.
If you are not going to use the TB3 for it's sounds, pretty much any sequencer will do the job...just not a drum machine!
I listened to Hatfield and the North at Rainbow. They were very wonderful and they made my heart a prisoner.
- pflosi
- Synth Explorer

- Posts: 3620
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 6:14 pm
- Gear: more than 150 characters...
- Location: zürich
- Contact:
Re: Roland TB-3 opinions?
Not always, only under midi control actuallymeatballfulton wrote:Slide is always a function of the receiving instrument.
Re: Roland TB-3 opinions?
Thanks guys, I guess my next question would be, how does the TB-3 sound? The sequencer and effects possibilities, as well as the scatter function seem really appealing to me, but the digital emulation of a 303 kinda worries me.
Arsenal: Elektron Machinedrum SPS-1,Roland JX-3P, Yamaha DX7s, Doepfer Dark Energy, Multivox String Machine, Korg DDD-1, Korg M1, Roland MKS-7, 1978 Fender Precision Bass, Upright Bass
- Stab Frenzy
- Moderator

- Posts: 9723
- Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 5:41 pm
- Gear: Eurorack, RYTM, Ultranova, many FX
- Location: monster island*
- Contact:
Re: Roland TB-3 opinions?
Well if you want to get picky the modular osc isn't it's own instrument, it's part of the same instrument as the slew.pflosi wrote:Not always, only under midi control actuallymeatballfulton wrote:Slide is always a function of the receiving instrument.For cv/gate it's often included in sequencers, or you use a slew in between. I don't know of any modular oscs that can slew on the pitch cv inputs...
- pflosi
- Synth Explorer

- Posts: 3620
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 6:14 pm
- Gear: more than 150 characters...
- Location: zürich
- Contact:
Re: Roland TB-3 opinions?
True, but is then my modular sequencer part of the whole instrument as well? 
- Stab Frenzy
- Moderator

- Posts: 9723
- Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 5:41 pm
- Gear: Eurorack, RYTM, Ultranova, many FX
- Location: monster island*
- Contact:
- Walter Ego
- Senior Member

- Posts: 897
- Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2012 7:17 pm
- Gear: Various noisemakers hidden around my home and classroom. And a great quantity of caffeine.
- Band: 12"VS
- Location: Near Boston
Re: Roland TB-3 opinions?
basic303 wrote:I'm considering getting a TB-3 to add to my acid set up which is criminally sans 303, but I do have a Doepfer Dark energy that I trigger with my Machinedrum to get a pretty good emulation. Only problem is the sequencer on the Machinedrum is limited and doesn't have that classic 303 slide. So I guess I'm thinking either using the TB-3 as a 303 clone, or using it to trigger the Dark Energy
Disclaimer: I haven't had time with the TB-3 myself. But what I understand is that it is quite limited. And demos I've heard sound pretty blah. Take that for what it's worth.
If you're really into acid and want THAT sound, why not just find a used x0xb0x? They can be found for 300-400 USD on the used market (not much more than the TB-3); or if you want something even more recent and a tad bit pricier, there's the TT Cyclone. Purists may bicker about the precise sound, but they may be more fun than the new Roland box.
Walter Ego
seamonkey wrote:I nominate this for STUPIDEST THREAD ever in the history of the internez.
- ninja6485
- Synth Explorer

- Posts: 2771
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:13 pm
- Gear: Virus Ti, Jx-8p, Juno 60, Radias, Maschine, 101,303,606,707,727,808,909, odyssey, mirage, akai s5K/s2K/s1k, drumtraks, E6400ult, M1R, rx5, fizmo,d50
- Band: Subliminal Sea
- Location: Exton/ westchester
- Contact:
Re: Roland TB-3 opinions?
I'm in the same boat - not having sat down with the tb3 myself, although I thought that the sound was supposed to be pretty good, and if you compare the limitations of the tb-3 with the Xoxbox or cyclone, the latter two are going to be more limited feature-wise. I noticed a few of the reviewers were almost shocked in their experience tweaking the tb-3, which is a very good sign.Walter Ego wrote:Disclaimer: I haven't had time with the TB-3 myself. But what I understand is that it is quite limited. And demos I've heard sound pretty blah. Take that for what it's worth.
This looks like a psychotropic reaction. No wonder it's so popular...


