am i the only one using cubase?
Forum rules
READ: VSE Board-Wide Rules and Guidelines
READ: VSE Board-Wide Rules and Guidelines
- novielo
- Moderator

- Posts: 1221
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:37 pm
- Gear: in order of appearence:
sh2000 s612 nord modular mpc1000 kp3 ms-something cp-251 gameboy s6000 and other crappy stuff - Band: one-man band
- Location: by the river, st-jerome, quebec, canada, north america
- Contact:
am i the only one using cubase?
well, i'm sure i'm not. but it doesn't seems to that there's alot of poeple here using it.
i never tried any other recording programs exept cool edit pro. i realy like this software, i still use it from time to time.
i switched to cubase sx3 because of midi (compared to cool edit) and the ability to host vst. yes, it has it's drawback but without ever tried anything else i cannot say.
on the pros side, i realy like the fact that within few click cut and paste of midi and/or audio is made. even the automation follow the cut and paste.
but something i don't like about cubase it's the hard time editing midi that have recorded, it's realy not user friendly. also editing loop is a quite hard. in fact i'm learning senquencer gold, on an old laptop, at this time to do it with a third party.
so, for what reason did you choose you recording software? and why do you like it or not?
i never tried any other recording programs exept cool edit pro. i realy like this software, i still use it from time to time.
i switched to cubase sx3 because of midi (compared to cool edit) and the ability to host vst. yes, it has it's drawback but without ever tried anything else i cannot say.
on the pros side, i realy like the fact that within few click cut and paste of midi and/or audio is made. even the automation follow the cut and paste.
but something i don't like about cubase it's the hard time editing midi that have recorded, it's realy not user friendly. also editing loop is a quite hard. in fact i'm learning senquencer gold, on an old laptop, at this time to do it with a third party.
so, for what reason did you choose you recording software? and why do you like it or not?
-Save yourself the time and have a conversation with a plastic chair. -RobotHeroes
- killanator
- Active Member

- Posts: 419
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 7:03 am
- Real name: Carl
- Gear: Alesis Quadrasynth, Roland SH-201, Various MIDI things, Samson MediaONE 5a Active Studio Monitors
- Band: Solo
- Location: California
-
GeneralBigbag
- Senior Member

- Posts: 852
- Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 10:16 pm
- Location: Grad school
- Synthaholic
- Expert Member

- Posts: 1206
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 5:43 pm
- Gear: Motif XS6, TX802, D-550, A6
- Location: NH
I use Cubase AI 4, which is the version bundled with the Yamaha Motif XS.
Can't complain about it, since it was "free". Or, maybe I paid over $2K for it and got a free Motif XS6 with it.
Can't complain about it, since it was "free". Or, maybe I paid over $2K for it and got a free Motif XS6 with it.
Two VCO: thanks to the push rods, one can choose several forms of waves at the same time!
(from a Babelfish translation of a Jupiter-6 site)
Yamaha: Motif XS6, TX802 Roland: D-550 Alesis: A6 Andromeda
(from a Babelfish translation of a Jupiter-6 site)
Yamaha: Motif XS6, TX802 Roland: D-550 Alesis: A6 Andromeda
- CS_TBL
- Synth Explorer

- Posts: 1677
- Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 3:47 pm
- Gear: All "In-The-Box"
Mainly FM8 - Location: NL
- Contact:
sx3 here.. but I'm not using much of it, only the VSTi hosting, which includes the VSTi tracker I'm using to control VSTi instruments. So, no score editor, piano roll, main arrange window, you name it.. I'm not using it. Technically I don't even need to use cubase at all for that matter (as there are free hosts), but the programmer of the tracker uses it, and for beta testing purposes I want to have the exact same config to exclude external errors/bugs.
"You know I love you, CS, but this is bullshit." (Automatic Gainsay)
s: VSL/FM8/EWQL/LASS h: DX7/FS1r/VL70/SY77/SN2r/JD800/JD990/XV88/Emu6400/Poly61/Amek35:12:2/genelec1030 r: Violin/AltoSax/TinWhistle c: i7-4770/RAM32GB/SSD
FM8 vids
s: VSL/FM8/EWQL/LASS h: DX7/FS1r/VL70/SY77/SN2r/JD800/JD990/XV88/Emu6400/Poly61/Amek35:12:2/genelec1030 r: Violin/AltoSax/TinWhistle c: i7-4770/RAM32GB/SSD
FM8 vids
-
MitchK1989
- Active Member

- Posts: 663
- Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 1:46 am
- Location: Nova Scotia
Almost all of the "mainstream" daws are more or less identical functionality wise, so it all boils down to workflow and personal preference.
I personally use logic because I'm addicted to the hyper editor for midi functions. I just love that I can stepsequence any parameter that is exposed to automation or midi control, or use it to create pattern based drum sequences in the same way ultrabeat does.
I personally use logic because I'm addicted to the hyper editor for midi functions. I just love that I can stepsequence any parameter that is exposed to automation or midi control, or use it to create pattern based drum sequences in the same way ultrabeat does.
- redroomrecordings
- Junior Member

- Posts: 181
- Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 8:22 pm
- Gear: Virus TI . Virus C . Blofeld . Maschine
- Band: Distorted Memory / CAKEBUILDER
- Location: Winnipeg, Canada
- Contact:
- Untouchable_888
- Junior Member

- Posts: 241
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 1:55 am
- Real name: Nightshade
- Gear: Cheetah ms6
Moog Mother-32
Roland JP-08
Novation Circuit
Korg Volca Sample
bass guitar - Band: Heart of Thorns
- Location: Rutland, VT
- Contact:
Re: am i the only one using cubase?
Yeah, cubase has c**p midi timing. I use midi very little, but when i used to run Logic, it was great. ultimately i got only like 1ms of jitter!novielo wrote:well, i'm sure i'm not. but it doesn't seems to that there's alot of poeple here using it.
i never tried any other recording programs exept cool edit pro. i realy like this software, i still use it from time to time.
i switched to cubase sx3 because of midi (compared to cool edit) and the ability to host vst. yes, it has it's drawback but without ever tried anything else i cannot say.
on the pros side, i realy like the fact that within few click cut and paste of midi and/or audio is made. even the automation follow the cut and paste.
but something i don't like about cubase it's the hard time editing midi that have recorded, it's realy not user friendly. also editing loop is a quite hard. in fact i'm learning senquencer gold, on an old laptop, at this time to do it with a third party.
so, for what reason did you choose you recording software? and why do you like it or not?
but i use Live these days..
I'm using SX1 with no Midi timing problems at all. In fact, with Ableton Live 7, if I try to send Midi clocks to my Kenton box for conversion to DinSync, the timing is absolute s**t. Clocks from Cubase are spot on. Ableton's timing is also lousy as a ReWire slave on my PC.
I've used Cubase since version 1.0 on the Atari ST, so I know the Midi editing workflow well. I've never found it un-user-friendly since there are all those keyboard shortcuts and you can always quickly zoom the part. I do wish there was more power in transforming events, like MitchK says.
There was a period of time when the PC version's timing was absolutely pathetic, probably all versions between 1997 and 2003. Maybe it was just the hardware and OS getting better, but I absolutely hated it on PC until after that. I used an Akai MPC mostly for sequencing up to that point.
I've used Cubase since version 1.0 on the Atari ST, so I know the Midi editing workflow well. I've never found it un-user-friendly since there are all those keyboard shortcuts and you can always quickly zoom the part. I do wish there was more power in transforming events, like MitchK says.
There was a period of time when the PC version's timing was absolutely pathetic, probably all versions between 1997 and 2003. Maybe it was just the hardware and OS getting better, but I absolutely hated it on PC until after that. I used an Akai MPC mostly for sequencing up to that point.
I am no longer in pursuit of vintage synths. The generally absurd inflation from demand versus practical use and maintenance costs is no longer viable. The internet has suffocated and vanquished yet another wonderful hobby. Too bad.
--Solderman no more.
--Solderman no more.
- Untouchable_888
- Junior Member

- Posts: 241
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 1:55 am
- Real name: Nightshade
- Gear: Cheetah ms6
Moog Mother-32
Roland JP-08
Novation Circuit
Korg Volca Sample
bass guitar - Band: Heart of Thorns
- Location: Rutland, VT
- Contact:
i havent tried to run midid thru. not yet. dont plan on it eitehr. but good to know! thanks!!Solderman wrote:I'm using SX1 with no Midi timing problems at all. In fact, with Ableton Live 7, if I try to send Midi clocks to my Kenton box for conversion to DinSync, the timing is absolute s**t. Clocks from Cubase are spot on. Ableton's timing is also lousy as a ReWire slave on my PC.
I've used Cubase since version 1.0 on the Atari ST, so I know the Midi editing workflow well. I've never found it un-user-friendly since there are all those keyboard shortcuts and you can always quickly zoom the part. I do wish there was more power in transforming events, like MitchK says.
There was a period of time when the PC version's timing was absolutely pathetic, probably all versions between 1997 and 2003. Maybe it was just the hardware and OS getting better, but I absolutely hated it on PC until after that. I used an Akai MPC mostly for sequencing up to that point.
A.D.I.D.A.S.
[All Day I Dream About Synths]
~NOVATION IMPULSE 49 -> Cheetah ms6, Roland JP-08, Arturia Minibrute, Kong Volca Keys, bass guitar, <-/-> M-Audio MIDIman 2x4 -> Focusrite Scarlett 18i8 etc.
[All Day I Dream About Synths]
~NOVATION IMPULSE 49 -> Cheetah ms6, Roland JP-08, Arturia Minibrute, Kong Volca Keys, bass guitar, <-/-> M-Audio MIDIman 2x4 -> Focusrite Scarlett 18i8 etc.
-
chamomileshark
- Active Member

- Posts: 357
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 6:00 pm
- Location: UK
- Contact:
I started with a cracked version of Pro24 on an Atari, quickly moving to Cubeat. I was amazed when I returned music about 15 years later that although steinberg hadn't got my registration card for the new Cubase SX I bought, they still had me on the database from that Cubeat installation.
I used Cubase SX3, use probably 1% of the functionality but have the feeling should I need to do something clever, Cubase SX3 will probably allow me to do it.
I used Cubase SX3, use probably 1% of the functionality but have the feeling should I need to do something clever, Cubase SX3 will probably allow me to do it.
- Stab Frenzy
- Moderator

- Posts: 9723
- Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 5:41 pm
- Gear: Eurorack, RYTM, Ultranova, many FX
- Location: monster island*
- Contact:
I use Pro Tools for recording and mixing, mostly because I did an engineering course that used PT as the main software and I know a lot about how to use it quickly and get the results I want from it. I also have a few really nice plugins that are RTAS only, which is probably one of the major reasons that Logic 8 doesn't tempt me. When McDSP release their AUs I guess I'll have to reconsider...
I quit after SX3 and jumped ship to Ableton. The amount of work you have to do to create a new track and get a softsynth going is ridiculous, the fact you can't switch around effects (this took until version 4) is ridiculous, and dumping the only hardware MIDI interface with the special sauce timing is ridiculous, too. Then again, Logic doesn't officially support the AMT8 anymore either and there's no alternative to be found anywhere.
Maybe you should've put this question in the form of a poll
.
Maybe you should've put this question in the form of a poll
"Part of an instrument is what it can do, and part of it is what you do to it" - Suzanne Ciani, 197x.
It would depend on one's work style, I think. With Cubase, I can create four Midi tracks, (in 3 seconds with keyboard shortcuts, btw) and populate each with one drum part, (hat sequences on one, kick on one, snare on one, etc.) and then each one sends Midi events to one VSTI. In Ableton, aren't you forced to keep all Midi events for one VSTI instance in one Midi track? Or do you just create more Midi tracks and send their outputs to the Midi track with the VST? By not being able to move effects around, do you mean drag inserts on one audio track to another, complete with all the settings for it?Yoozer wrote:I quit after SX3 and jumped ship to Ableton. The amount of work you have to do to create a new track and get a softsynth going is ridiculous...
Also, what is special sauce, timing? Does it come with a sesame seed bun?
I am no longer in pursuit of vintage synths. The generally absurd inflation from demand versus practical use and maintenance costs is no longer viable. The internet has suffocated and vanquished yet another wonderful hobby. Too bad.
--Solderman no more.
--Solderman no more.






