pflosi wrote:the ms 20 has a lot of negative reviews cause it was a "cheapo" budget synth. it has no chance to sound like the minimoogs or odysseys that everyone was used to when it came out. sounds quite dirty, especially with high resonance settings. but mind you, that's exactly why we love it now, it's the dirty character of that synth. also, some people don't like it's semimodular design, cause most of its uses are standard functions that could be done with some switches and pots without problems, like on many other synths. IMO it's the ability to interact with other gear that makes its patchpanel so unique and useful. also, the ESP is great, especially the pitch-to-cv.
Yeah but come on, that was the argument when the damn thing was new, 30 something years ago. Even then it was a weak argument, based on people too cheap to get a mini or Ody and expecting a synth from a completely different company, with a completely different ethos, made in a completely different continent, at a completely different price point, to sound the same as the American synths, really?
pflosi wrote:...IMO, unless you want polyphony, it's a better starting synth than a microkorg, cause all functions are available on the panel, it's knob-per-function, which the microkorg really is not.
just my two cents
Well, to some people, polyphony and things like perfect tuning, reliability, MIDI, patch storage etc are more important and I reckon starting out with a MicroKorg would be way easier than a MS-20, I know it doesn't have a "knob per function" interface but some features such as the patchbay on the MS-20 are far from easy to get to grips with for a beginner.
But really I was going more by the OP's budget, if you can find me an MS-20 for £500, then send a couple my way please
