Moog Sub 37

Jabberwalky · Post by **Jabberwalky** » Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:25 pm

I thought it was Duophonic.

Post by **nathanscribe** » Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:41 pm

I thought this was a thread, not a Möbius strip.

monolith · Post by **monolith** » Tue Jan 28, 2014 1:08 am

nathanscribe wrote:I thought this was a thread, not a Möbius strip.

Post by **Stab Frenzy** » Tue Jan 28, 2014 1:27 am

Perhaps the misleading thread title could be changed.

Kenneth · Post by **Kenneth** » Tue Jan 28, 2014 4:12 am

Stab Frenzy wrote:Perhaps the misleading thread title could be changed.

I said something about that a while ago, to no avail. Let's try and run it through spell check at the very least.

Post by **Stab Frenzy** » Tue Jan 28, 2014 4:18 am

Sometimes if you want something done properly...

monolith · Post by **monolith** » Tue Jan 28, 2014 5:15 am

Uncle Stabbers to the rescue

Post by **silikon** » Tue Jan 28, 2014 5:19 am

Page 1, wankers.

(Admittedly, I had hoped it would stick...)

Page 1 spellcheck

Sir Nose · Post by **Sir Nose** » Tue Jan 28, 2014 2:23 pm

It looks like they really got it right this time. It will be a while for me, but in 3-5 years, who knows. Hopefully, Moog will come out with a poly around then and folks will be dumping these cheap.

moremagic · Post by **moremagic** » Tue Jan 28, 2014 11:39 pm

Why is this thing only 37 keys? the voyagers still got 44, right? and duophony would make more keys more interesting

monolith · Post by **monolith** » Wed Jan 29, 2014 12:57 am

THE SUB-37 IS GREAT SYNTH BUT NOT AS FAT AS A CS-10

-JOE

Automatic Gainsay · Post by **Automatic Gainsay** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 3:40 am

smcumber wrote:That's "polyphonic" in the classical music sense. "Polyphonic" when referring to synthesizers means each voice runs through a separate envelope and filter, instead of sharing one. Both of these voices have the ability to have independent pitches but share the same envelope/filter, so it is paraphonic.

I'm sorry, but no.

"Polyphonic" in regard to synthesizers means multiple voices, and that's the end of it.

What you're talking about is our desire for each voice to have individual articulation... which is a different matter.

The term "paraphonic" applies to monophonic synthesizers, too.

[Keeping in mind, as CZ Rider pointed out, that originally "paraphonic" was a word created by Roland to describe synthesizers with multiple overlapping sections]

Kenneth · Post by **Kenneth** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 4:44 am

Let's count the number of times we have to go over the definitions of "polyphonic" and "paraphonic" for someone who missed it the first time. I'm at 247.

Post by **Stab Frenzy** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 5:29 am

Maybe instead of writing 'paraphonic' on it they should have written 'monophonic with a cool split osc trick'. I guess maybe that wouldn't fit on the panel.

Dr. Phibes · Post by **Dr. Phibes** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 5:31 am

I would need to hear it in the flesh to starts GASing. So far, for all the features it's overall tone is leaving me cold .

Moog Sub 37

Re: Moog Sub 37, finaly a new poliphonic Moog?

Re: Moog Sub 37, finaly a new poliphonic Moog?

Re: Moog Sub 37, finaly a new poliphonic Moog?

Re: Moog Sub 37, finaly a new poliphonic Moog?

Re: Moog Sub 37, finaly a new poliphonic Moog?

Re: Moog Sub 37

Re: Moog Sub 37

Re: Moog Sub 37

Re: Moog Sub 37

Re: Moog Sub 37

Re: Moog Sub 37

Re: Moog Sub 37, finaly a new poliphonic Moog?

Re: Moog Sub 37

Re: Moog Sub 37

Re: Moog Sub 37